A Study of the Effect of Learning Strategies on new Products Development with Regard to Moderating Role of Strategic Orientations and Cognitive Capabilities

Subject Areas : Strategic Management Researches

Shahram Khalil Nezhad ¹ , mohammad reza daneshvar deylami ²

1 - استادیار مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی.
2 - student/Allameh Tabataba'i University

Received: 2018-03-09 Accepted : 2018-08-06 Published : 2018-08-23

Keywords: strategic orientation, Learning strategy, product development, cognitive capability,

Abstract :

The main objective of this study is to examine the effect of learning strategies on the development of new products in the Pharmaceutical Companies in Iran. Furthermore, the study examines the role of strategic orientation and cognitive capabilities in strengthening or weakening the relationship. The paradigm of the research is positivism, the approach is deductive and the strategy is surveying. Therefore, after reviewing the literature and designing concept model, a questionnaire consisting of 23 questions were distributed to 131 company. At least two of the senior or middle managers responded to each question, and the average of their opinions analyzed. Face and content validity of the questionnaire were verified according to experts, using standard questionnaires and relying on confirmatory factor analysis. As well as, reliability was approved by the Cronbach's alpha test, composite reliability and average variance. Then, the data were analyzed and tested using Smart PLS software through the correlation matrix, the structural equation model and the fitness analysis. The results show that exploratory and exploitative learning strategies effect on new products development. In addition, it was found that the cognitive capabilities can adjust this relationship. Strategic orientations, have a moderating role in relation between exploitative learning strategies and product development, but, their role in the relationship between exploratory and product development strategies are not significant.

References:

ایرانبان، سیدجواد، سیدحسینی، سیدمحمد (1383). استراتژی توسعه محصول جدید: رویکردها و یافته‌ها. دانش مدیریت،81-106.
خاشعی، وحید، دانشوردیلمی، محمدرضا (1395). تأثیر سیستم حافظه تعاملی بر عملکرد تیمی کارکنان با در نظر گرفتن نقش استراتژی یادگیری بهره‌بردارانه و جهت‌گیری استراتژیک. مطالعات بهبود و تحول، 25(81)،  81-100.
دانشوردیلمی، محمدرضا (1395). رابطه سیستم حافظه تعاملی و استراتژی‌های یادگیری با عملکرد تیمی کارکنان در شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان. تهران: پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی.
داوری، علی، رضازاده، آرش (۱۳۹3). مدل سازی معادلات ساختاری با نرم‌افزار SMART PLS، انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی، چاپ دوم.
طبرسا، غلام علی، رضاییان، علی، نظرپوری، امیرحسین (1391). طراحی و تبیین مدل مزیت رقابتی مبتنی بر هوشمندی سازمانی در سازمان‌های دانش‌بنیان. تحقیقات بازاریابی نوین، جلد 4، 44-72
میربهرسی، هستی (1392). تأثیر جهت‌گیری استراتژیک بر توسعه محصول جدید و بهبود مستمر. تهران: پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی

.Atuahene-Gima, K (2007). Exploratory and exploitative learning in new product development: a social capital perspective on new technology ventures in china. Journal of International Marketing 15 (2), 1-29.
Beck, T, Degryse, H, De Haas, R & Van Horen, N (2018). When arm's length is too far: Relationship banking over the credit cycle. Journal of Financial Economics, 127(1), 174-196.
Boyle, P & Haggerty, K (2012). Planning for the Worst: Risk, Uncertainty and the Olympic Games. British Journal of Sociology 63(2), 241–259.
10. Brion, S, Chauvet, V, Chollet, B & Mothe, C (2012). Project leaders as boundary spanners: Relational antecedents and performance outcomes. International Journal Project Management, 30 (6), 708–722.
11. Cunha, M. P. E, Neves, P, Clegg, S. R & Rego, A (2015). Tales of the unexpected:Discussing improvisational learning. Management Learning, 46(5), 511–529.
12. Cynthia, A & Tammy, B (2011). Developing a capacity for organizational resilience through strategic Human Resource Management Review 21(3).
13. Fornell, C & Larcker, D (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Modeling with Unobserved Variables and Measurement Error. Marking Research, 18(1), 39-50.
14. García-Morales, V.J, Jimenez-Barrionuevo, M, M & Gutierrez– Gutierrez, L (2012). Transformational leadership influence on organizational performance through organizational learning and innovation. Journal of  Business Research, 65(7), pp. 1040-1050.
15. González-Benito, J & Boyd, I (2012). Coming to Consensus on Strategic Consensus A Mediated Moderation Model of Consensus and Performance. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1685-1714.
16. Hahn, M. H, Lee, K. C & Lee, D. S (2016). Network structure, organizational learning culture,and employee creativity in systemintegration companies: Themediating effectsof exploitation and exploration. Computers in Human Behavior, 42, 167–175.
17. Helfat, C. E & Peteraf, M. A (2015). Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 831-850.
18. Hofman, E, Faems, D & Schleimer, S. C (2017). Governing collaborative new product development: Toward a configurational perspective on the role of contracts. Journal of product innovation management, 34(6), 739-756.
19. Hulland, J (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic managem ent research: a review of four recent studies. Strategic management journal, 20(2), 195-204.
20. Huang, Y. C, Ma, R & Lee, K. W (2015). Exploitative learning in project teams: Do cognitive capability and strategic orientations act as moderator variables?. International Journal of Project Management, 33(4), 760-771.
21. Joshi. K, Lee.Y & Kim.Y (2017). Organizational memory and new product development performance: Investigating the role of organizational ambidexterity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 120, Pages 117-129.
22. Lee, R & Johnson, J )2010(. Managing The Multiple Facets For Risk ln new Product Alliances. Decision Science, 41(2), 271-300.
23. Li, Y, Su, Z, Liu, Y & Li, M (2011). Fast adaptation, strategic flexibility and entrepreneurial roles. Chinese Management Studies, 5(3), 256-271.
24. Li, Y. H & Huang, J. W (2013). Exploitative and exploratory learning in transactive memory systems and project performance. Information & Management, 50(6), 304-313.
25. Liao, S & Hu, T (2007). Knowledge transfer and competitive advantage on environmental uncertainty: an empirical study of the Taiwan’s industry. Technovation, 27, 402-411.
26. Li, C.R & Chu, C.P (2010). The contingent value of exploratory and exploitative learning for new product development performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(7), 1186-1197.
27. Mu, J, Thomas, E, Peng, G & Di Benedetto, A (2017). Strategic orientation and new product development performance: The role of networking capability and networking ability. Industrial Marketing Management, 64, 187-201.
28. Park, M, Lim, J & Birnbaum-More, P (2012). The effect of multiknowledge individuals on performance in cross-functional new product development teams. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 40(4).
29. Riding, R & Rayner, S (2013). Cognitive styles and learning strategies: Understanding style differences in learning and behavior. David Fulton Publishers.
30. Saebi. T, Lien S & Foss. N (2017). What Drives Business Model Adaptation? The Impact of Opportunities, Threats and Strategic Orientation Long Range Planning, 50(5), 567-581.
31. Knudsen, T & Srikanth, K (2014). Coordinated exploration organizing joint search by multiple specialists to overcome mutual confusion and joint myopia. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(3), 409-441
32. Kusumastuti, R, Kasim, A & Hardjosoekarto, S (2018). Strategic Ambidexterity Learning of Innovation Activities: A Study of Indonesian Business Group Leader. Policy & Governance Review, 2(1), 70-84.
33. Relich, M & Pawlewski, P (2018). A case-based reasoning approach to cost estimation of new product development. Neurocomputing, 272, 40-45.