Selective Abduction in the Selection of Hypotheses and its Relationship with Inference to the Best Explanation (IBE)

Subject Areas : Philosophy

Seyyed Ahmad  Mirsanei ¹ ()

Received: 2021-06-28 Accepted : 2022-09-07 Published : 2022-08-23

Keywords: inference to the best explanat, Creative Abduction, Selective Abduction, Factual Abduction, hypothesis,

Abstract :

Selective abduction is in contrast with creative abduction as well as Inference to the Best Explanation (IBE). There are two types of selective abduction: Either hypotheses are selected among new and conjectural hypotheses without any prior knowledge ( Pierce s' selective abduction), or the selection of the best hypotheses and explanations is among a large number of possible hypotheses and explanations already known (L. Magnani's selective abduction and G. Schurz's factual abduction). According to both views, as well as an alternative view, which belongs to Dov M. Gabby and John Woods, selective abduction is different from inference to the best explanation. Schurz's factual abduction depends on all three sub-processes of inference, i.e.: colligation, observation, and judgment (c, o, and j); But Pierce's selective abduction, on the other hand, has only a third sub-process, i.e. judgment process (j), and therefore it cannot be regarded as a process of abductive epistemic inference.