A Comparative study of dialogue in Saadi's Golestan and Onsorol-mali's Qaboosnameh based on Mikhail Bakhtin’s Logic of dialogue

Subject Areas : شاهنامه

حسین  حسن پور آلاشتی ¹ (دانشیار زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه مازندران)
مرضیه  حقیقی ² (دانشجوی دکتری زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه مازندران)

Received: 2014-11-02 Accepted : 2015-02-25 Published : 2015-11-01

Keywords: c, Mikhail Bakhtin, the logic of dialogue, Saadi’s Golestan, Qaboosnameh, Polyphony,

Abstract :

The theory of the logic of dialogue or the logic of conversation in the twentieth century was proposed in contrast to Saussure's structural linguistics and cognitive style. On the one hand, Mikhail Bakhtin in the protest of single voice of Stalin’s regime and on the other hand, the   opposition of the theory of individualism and non- socialism of language that was dominant before him in the criticism domain, he  proposed the  theory of multiple voices and dialogue-centerd language of literature and art. Since Bakhtin considersthe dialogue-centered approach in the essence of art, this theory is used in reading of different works literature and art at present time. Given that the logic of conversation coming from the mono-voice, anti-dogmatic, and anti-happiness community, in this study one of the darkest periods of social and literary life in Iran after the Mongol invasions has been considered.in order to demonstrate the effectiveness of the social structure dialogue-centered method of   authors, two prose works of Golestan and Qaboosnamh have been concidered that one of them relates to the pre-Mongol period and the other one belongs to  Mongol conquest, are selected. In spite of the facts that both works are equal with respect to contents and didactic points Onsorolmali’s approach is different from Saadi‘s apporoch  from dialogue components point of view. Therefore, this paper aims to study the logic of conversation in theses two written works of Persian literature.