The Regeneration of Forgotten Architectural Space, A Design for Sustainable Architectural Development (Case Study: Industrial Spaces in Tabriz)
Subject Areas : Geography and Architecture
Dr.shabnam akbari namdar
1
*
,
Haniyeh KHodaei
2
1 - Department of Architecture, Ta.C. Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
2 - Ph.D Student of Architecture, Ta.C. Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
Keywords: Sustainable Architecture, Regeneration of Industrial Spaces, Tabriz, Sustainable Development.,
Abstract :
Abstract
By increasing awareness of environmental challenges and the need to move toward sustainable development, urban regeneration and recycling and adaptive reuse of forgotten architectural spaces has emerged as an important solution. Even this process can lead to reduce the need for demolition and new construction and it also provides opportunities to preserve historical identity, optimization of resource consumption, and enhance social interaction. In the meantime, the regeneration of forgotten industrial spaces can play a significant role in regenerating decayed urban areas and expanding the sustainable architectural. The aim of this research is to present a practical and locali model for the regeneration of abandoned industrial spaces in Tabriz that can contribute to sustainable urban development and sustainable architecture while taking into account the climatic and cultural conditions of the region. This study is a descriptive-analytical and applied and has been conducted using a mixed-method approach(qualitative and quantitative).The findings also indicated that one of the most significant challenges in the regeneration of industrial spaces is the change in the mindset of the community and urban policymakers. To address this challenge, this research suggests some solutions such increasing public awareness, enacting supportive regulations, and organizing training workshops.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
In recent years, the rapid growth of urbanization and industrial development in many cities worldwide has led to the gradual loss of function and neglect of architectural spaces, particularly industrial sites. This trend has not only resulted in the proliferation of urban decay and the inefficient use of resources but has also had adverse consequences for the environment and urban communities. The city of Tabriz, as one of Iran’s significant industrial and historical centers, contains a significant number of abandoned and forgotten industrial spaces which, despite their substantial potential, currently play a marginal role within the urban fabric. By increasing awareness of environmental challenges and the need to move toward sustainable development, urban regeneration and recycling and adaptive reuse of forgotten architectural spaces has emerged as an important solution. Even this process can lead to reduce the need for demolition and new construction and it also provide opportunities to preserve historical identity, optimization of resource consumption, and enhance social interaction. In the meantime , the regeneration of forgotten industrial spaces can play a significant role in regenerating decayed urban areas and expanding the sustainable architectural. The aim of this research is to present a practical and locali model for the regeneration of abandoned industrial spaces in Tabriz that can contribute to sustainable urban development and sustainable architecture while taking into account the climatic and cultural conditions of the region. This study, with an analytical approach and case study will examine the role of regenerating these spaces in improving urban quality of life and protecting the environment.
Data and Method
This study is a descriptive-analytical and applied and has been conducted using a mixed-method approach (qualitative and quantitative). The main objective of this research is to investigate and analyze the regeneration of abandoned industrial spaces in Tabriz through the approach of sustainable architectural , and to propose practical solutions for their redevelopment. Statistical Population and Sampling Statistical Population: The statistical population includes abandoned industrial spaces located in Tabriz which include historical and old factories and workshops. Sampling: Using a purposive sampling method, 10 abandoned industrial spaces with specific characteristics (including historical value and potential for regeneration) were selected as samples.
Figure1: Conceptual Model of the Research Methodology
Source: Authors
Results and Discussion
The findings indicate that although the regeneration of abandoned industrial spaces in Tabriz presents significant challenges, a comprehensively and sustainable approach can help preserve the city's cultural identity and enhance urban sustainability. In this context ,using modern design methods and green technologies, these spaces can become valuable resources for improving the quality of urban life.
Conclusion
The results show that theses spaces in Tabriz have significant potential to adapt to modern needs and strengthen urban sustainability. These findings were analyzed and evaluted based on the principles of sustainable architecture including reuse of existing resources, reduction of structural waste, and increased social cohesion. The findings also indicated that one of the most significant challenges in the regeneration of industrial spaces is the change in the mindset of the community and urban policymakers. To address this challenge, this research suggests some solutions such increasing public awareness, enacting supportive regulations , and organizing training workshops. Finally, this research emphasizies the connection between sustainable architecture and the generation of abandoned spaces demonstartes that by adopting comprehensive and multidimensional approach these spaces can be used as valuable resources for enhancing urban sustainability.
References English and Persian
1.Adams, W. M. (2006). The future of sustainability: Rethinking the environment and development in the twenty-first century. Report of the IUCN Renowned Thinkers Meeting, 29–31 January 2006.
2.Bai, X. (2007). Industrial ecology and the global impacts of cities. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 11(2), 1–6.
3.Beatley, T. (2004). Planning for sustainability in European cities: A review of practices in leading cities. In S. M. Wheeler & T. Beatley (Eds.), The sustainable urban development reader (pp. 114–121). Routledge.
4.Benyus, J. M. (2002). Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature. HarperCollins Perennial.
5.Bergen, S. D., Bolton, S. M., & Fridley, J. L. (2001). Design principles for ecological engineering. Ecological Engineering, 18(2), 201–210.
6.Bullen, P. A., & Love, P. E. D. (2011). Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings. Structural Survey, 29(5), 411–421.
7.Costanza, R., & Daly, H. E. (1992). Natural capital and sustainable development. Conservation Biology, 6(1), 37–46.
8.Dewi, T. H. S., Nirawati, M. A., & Handayani, K. N. (2015). Taman bermain dengan pendekatan arsitektur hijau di Sukoharjo. Arsitektura, 13(1).
9.Dresner, S. (2002). The principles of sustainability. Earthscan.
10.Du Plessis, C. (2012). Towards a regenerative paradigm for the built environment. Building Research & Information, 40(1), 7–22.
11.Giebeler, G. (2009). Sustainable building design: Principles and practices. Springer.
12.Holling, C. S., & Gunderson, L. H. (2002). Resilience and adaptive cycles. In L. H. Gunderson & C. S. Holling (Eds.), Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems (pp. 25–62). Island Press.
13.Jafari, A., & Maleki, S. (2021). Revitalizing abandoned architectural spaces in Iran: A cultural approach. Journal of Architectural Studies, 10(2), 45–58.( in Persian)
14.Johnson, P. (2018). Sustainable architecture: From theory to practice. Green Design Press.
15.Karyono, T. H. (2010). Green Architecture: Pengantar Pemahaman Arsitektur Hijau di Indonesia. Rajawali Pers.
16.Kazemi, H., & Karimi, A. (2019). Industrial spaces of Tabriz: Challenges and opportunities. Urban Management Quarterly, 14(3), 23–38. ( in Persian)
17.Kibert, C. J. (2008). Sustainable construction: Green building design and delivery. Wiley.
18.Langston, C. (2013). Sustainable practices in adaptive reuse. Journal of Green Building, 8(4), 24–35.
19.Lex, E. (2019). Sounding out Place and Cultural Memory in Tempelhofer: Human Scale. Abstracts of the ICA, 1, 212.
20.Lyle, J. T. (1994). Regenerative design for sustainable development. Wiley.
21.Mang, P., & Reed, B. (2012). Designing from place: A regenerative framework and methodology. Building Research & Information, 40(1), 23–38.
22.McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. North Point Press.
23.Moradi, M., & Ahmadi, B. (2020). Patterns of industrial land reuse in Iran. Iranian Journal of Urban Studies, 9(1), 65–80. ( in Persian)
24.Randall, J. M. (2019). 'Personal Structures-Identities', 2019 Venice Art Biennale, PAPER Pavilion, European Cultural Centre, Palazzo Mora, Strada Nova 3659, Cannaregio, Venice.
25.Reed, B. (2007). Shifting from ‘sustainability’ to regeneration. Building Research & Information, 35(6), 674–680.
26.Rees, W. E., & Wackernagel, M. (1996). Urban ecological footprints: Why cities cannot be sustainable – and why they are key to sustainability. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16, 223–248.
27.Silva, J. M. The eternal and the metamorphosis. Processes of urban heritage production.
28.Smith, J., Brown, P., & Johnson, R. (2019). Adaptive reuse of industrial spaces: Economic and aesthetic impacts. Journal of Sustainable Urban Development, 15(3), 150–172.
29.Smith, T., Johnson, L., & Brown, E. (2020). Industrial space regeneration: A sustainable approach. International Journal of Urban Planning, 20(4), 110–125.
30.Wong, T., Zhang, L., & Chen, Y. (2021). Integrating cultural and environmental aspects in industrial heritage redevelopment. Urban Sustainability Review, 12(4), 250–270.
31.Wright, T., & Hall, S. (2020). Reclaiming abandoned spaces for community use: A socio-environmental perspective. Sustainable Cities and Society, 25, 45–55.
1.جعفری، احمد، و ملکی، سیروس (1400). احیای فضاهای معماری رها شده در ایران با رویکردی فرهنگی. مجله مطالعات معماری، 10(2)، 45-58.
2.کاظمی، حمید، و کریمی، علی (1399). فضاهای صنعتی تبریز: چالشها و فرصتها. فصلنامه مدیریت شهری، 14(3)، 23-38.
3.مرادی، محمد، و احمدی، بهنام (1400). الگوهای استفاده مجدد از زمینهای صنعتی در ایران. مجله مطالعات شهری ایران، 9(1)، 65-80.
4.Adams, W. M. (2006). The future of sustainability: Rethinking the environment and development in the twenty-first century. Report of the IUCN Renowned Thinkers Meeting, 29–31 January 2006.
5.Bai, X. (2007). Industrial ecology and the global impacts of cities. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 11(2), 1–6.
6.Beatley, T. (2004). Planning for sustainability in European cities: A review of practices in leading cities. In S. M. Wheeler & T. Beatley (Eds.), The sustainable urban development reader (pp. 114–121). Routledge.
7.Benyus, J. M. (2002). Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature. HarperCollins Perennial.
8.Bergen, S. D., Bolton, S. M., & Fridley, J. L. (2001). Design principles for ecological engineering. Ecological Engineering, 18(2), 201–210.
9.Bullen, P. A., & Love, P. E. D. (2011). Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings. Structural Survey, 29(5), 411–421.
10.Costanza, R., & Daly, H. E. (1992). Natural capital and sustainable development. Conservation Biology, 6(1), 37–46.
11.Dewi, T. H. S., Nirawati, M. A., & Handayani, K. N. (2015). Taman bermain dengan pendekatan arsitektur hijau di Sukoharjo. Arsitektura, 13(1).
12.Dresner, S. (2002). The principles of sustainability. Earthscan.
13.Du Plessis, C. (2012). Towards a regenerative paradigm for the built environment. Building Research & Information, 40(1), 7–22.
14.Giebeler, G. (2009). Sustainable building design: Principles and practices. Springer.
15.Holling, C. S., & Gunderson, L. H. (2002). Resilience and adaptive cycles. In L. H. Gunderson & C. S. Holling (Eds.), Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems (pp. 25–62). Island Press.
16.Johnson, P. (2018). Sustainable architecture: From theory to practice. Green Design Press.
17.Karyono, T. H. (2010). Green Architecture: Pengantar Pemahaman Arsitektur Hijau di Indonesia. Rajawali Pers.
18.Kibert, C. J. (2008). Sustainable construction: Green building design and delivery. Wiley.
19.Langston, C. (2013). Sustainable practices in adaptive reuse. Journal of Green Building, 8(4), 24–35.
20.Lex, E. (2019). Sounding out Place and Cultural Memory in Tempelhofer: Human Scale. Abstracts of the ICA, 1, 212.
21.Lyle, J. T. (1994). Regenerative design for sustainable development. Wiley.
22.Mang, P., & Reed, B. (2012). Designing from place: A regenerative framework and methodology. Building Research & Information, 40(1), 23–38.
23.McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. North Point Press.
24.Randall, J. M. (2019). 'Personal Structures-Identities', 2019 Venice Art Biennale, PAPER Pavilion, European Cultural Centre, Palazzo Mora, Strada Nova 3659, Cannaregio, Venice.
25.Reed, B. (2007). Shifting from ‘sustainability’ to regeneration. Building Research & Information, 35(6), 674–680.
26.Rees, W. E., & Wackernagel, M. (1996). Urban ecological footprints: Why cities cannot be sustainable – and why they are key to sustainability. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16, 223–248.
27.Silva, J. M. The eternal and the metamorphosis. Processes of urban heritage production.
28.Smith, J., Brown, P., & Johnson, R. (2019). Adaptive reuse of industrial spaces: Economic and aesthetic impacts. Journal of Sustainable Urban Development, 15(3), 150–172.
29.Smith, T., Johnson, L., & Brown, E. (2020). Industrial space regeneration: A sustainable approach. International Journal of Urban Planning, 20(4), 110–125.
30.Wong, T., Zhang, L., & Chen, Y. (2021). Integrating cultural and environmental aspects in industrial heritage redevelopment. Urban Sustainability Review, 12(4), 250–270.
31.Wright, T., & Hall, S. (2020). Reclaiming abandoned spaces for community use: A socio-environmental perspective. Sustainable Cities and Society, 25, 45–55.