Analyzing the Components of Resource Utilization with a Risk Management Approach: A Grounded theory Research
Subject Areas : Other related topicsMina Sadeghzadeh 1 , Hossein Adab 2 , Mohammadali Keramati 3 , Zabiholah Hashemi 4
1 - Ph.D. Candidate, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.
2 - 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Industrial Management, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.
3 - 3. Associate Professor, Department of Industrial Management, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.
4 - 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Industrial Management, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.
Keywords: Resource utilization, Risk management, Grounded Theory, Copper Industry ,
Abstract :
Risk management is one of the solutions of organizations to deal with uncertainty in the business environment, which has an effective role in using resources, as well as maintaining and promoting efficiency and effectiveness, and as a result,improving the organization's performance. The purpose of this research is to analyze the components of resource utilization with a risk management approach using the evolutionary theory (foundation data). In order to collect data in the qualitative part,semi-structured interviews were used, and the interviewees included managers and experts of one of the companies active in the copper industry and were selected purposefully. In order to model, the version of Strauss and Corbin was used in the foundation data approach.In this process, 60 concepts and 21 categories were created and they were grouped in the main 6 axis of Grounded theory. In the quantitative validation part of the model, structural equation modeling method was used.At first, questionnaires were compiled and their validity and reliability were examined.Content validity, divergent and convergent validity were used to measure validity, and Cronbach's alpha method was used for reliability and all were confirmed.Then it was distributed among the statistical sample. The statistical sample of managers and experts of the studied company was 82 people, and based on this, sampling was not done and the total number was counted.Based on the analysis of the questionnaire data, considering the non-normality of the data distribution,the research model was tested and confirmed by the partial least squares method with the help of SmartPLS3 software.
منابع آقازاده هاشم، اسفیدانی محمدرحیم، قلیمطلق مجید. طراحی مقیاس ارزیابی اخلاقی فروش شخصی. پژوهش های مدیریت در ایران. ۱۳۹۵; ۲۰ (۳) :۱-۲۴
جلیلی اسماعیل، مشبکی اصغر، خدادادحسینی سید حمید، آذر عادل (1398) طراحی مدل اجرای استراتژی ادغام سازمانهای دولتی ایران. پژوهش های مدیریت در ایران. ۲۳ (۲) :۱۵۱-۱۸۱
حقیقی کفاش مهدی، اسماعیلی محمدرضا، محمدیان محمود، تقوا محمدرضا (1395). دستهبندی عوامل مؤثر بر تقاضای محصولات فرهنگی در بازار داخلی. پژوهش های مدیریت در ایران، ۲۱ (۲) :۲۷-۴۶
خاکی، غلامرضا، (1400)، روش تحقیق گرانددی در مدیریت ، انتشارات بازتاب فوژان ، سال1390
قاسمی، بهزاد، والمحمدی، چنگیز. (1397). طراحی مدل بلوغ مدیریت دانش در کلاس جهانی بر اساس مدل تعالی: یک رویکرد آمیخته. پژوهش های مدیریت عمومی، 11، 40
قلی پور، آرین، افتخار، نیره. (1395). ارائه مدل مدیریت استعداد به روش نظریه مبنایی (مورد مطالعه: اپراتور تلفن همراه) پژوهش های مدیریت عمومی، 9، 34، 59 – 90
بهبهانی، حسین، دشتی، علی. (1399). ارزیابی ریسک به روش ردیابی انرژی و آنالیز موانع با استفاده از تاپسیس در واحد فولادسازی شرکت گروه ملی صنعتی فولاد ایران. مجله مهندسی بهداشت حرفه ای, 5(3), 25-34
حسینی, شاهین، کیماسی، علی, فیاضی, رضا (1401). ارائه الگوی مدیریت ریسک منابع انسانی در صنعت بانکداری بر اساس تحلیل دادهبنیاد (مورد مطالعه: بانکهای ملت تهران). مدیریت دولتی, 12(2), 346-376.
مرادی، علی، میرزازاده، حمید. (1398). شناسایی، ارزیابی و رتبهبندی ریسکهای تولید در صنعت دارو با استفاده از روش تجزیه و تحلیل عوامل شکست (مطالعه موردی: شرکت سبحان دارو). مدیریت بهداشت و درمان, 10(شماره 1), 43-51.
شکوهی منش، علی، خدادایان، رضا (1401). رابطه بین مدیریت ریسک سازمانی و عملکرد شرکت با نقش مزیت رقابتی و سواد مالی. پژوهش های حسابداری مالی و حسابرسی, 14(54), 79-100.
Aminbakhsh, S., Gunduz, M., & Sonmez, R. (2013). Safety risk assessment using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) during planning and budgeting of construction projects. Journal of safety research, 46, 99-105
. Arena, M., Arnaboldi, M., & Azzone, G. (2021). Is enterprise risk management real? Journal of Risk Research, 14(7), 779-797
. Barney, J. B., & Hesterly, W. (2016). Organizational economics: Understanding the relationship between organizations and economic analysis. The SAGE handbook of organization studies, 111-148
. Berry‐Stölzle, T. R., & Xu, J. (2018). Enterprise risk management and the cost of capital. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 85(1), 159-201
. Bertsimas, D., & Sim, M. (2013). Robust discrete optimization and network flows. Mathematical programming, 98(1-3), 49-71
. Castillo, A., Bilbao, A., & Bilbao, E. (2019). A Risk Management Method Based on the AS/NZS 4360 Standard. 2007 41st Annual IEEE International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology
, Chatterjee, K., Zavadskas, E. K., Tamošaitienė, J., Adhikary, K., & Kar, S. (2018).
A hybrid MCDM technique for risk management in construction projects. Symmetry, 10(2), 46
. Chavez-Demoulin, V., Davison, A. C., & McNeil, A. J. (2015). Estimating value-at-risk: a point process approach. Quantitative Finance, 5(2), 227-234
. Cheng, M., & Lu, Y. (2015.( Developing a risk assessment method for complex pipe jacking construction projects. Automation in Construction, 58, 48-59
. Clemen, R. T., & Reilly, T. (2013). Making hard decisions with DecisionTools. Cengage Learning
. Fahy, J. (2020). The resource‐based view of the firm: some stumbling‐blocks on the road to understanding sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of European industrial training, 24(2/3
Hoyt, R. E., & Liebenberg, A. P. (2015). Evidence of the value of enterprise risk management. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 27(1), 41-47
Low, S. P., Liu, J. Y., Ng, S. H. M., & Liu, X. (2013). Enterprise risk management and the performance of local contractors in Singapore. International Journal of Construction Management, 13(2), 27-41
. Safaeian, M., Fathollahi-Fard, A. M., Kabirifar, K., Yazdani, M., & Shapouri, M. (2022). Selecting appropriate risk response strategies considering utility function and budget constraints: a case study of a construction company in Iran. Buildings, 12(2), 98
Tranchard, S. (2018). Risk management: The new ISO 31000 keeps risk management simple. Governance Directions, 70(4), 180-182
. Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (2017). Theory of games and economic behavior (60th Anniversary Commemorative Edition). Princeton university press
Young, P. C., & Tippins, S. C. (2021). Managing business risk: an organization-wide approach to risk management. Applied Soft Computing, 64, 216-226
. Yu, C.-S., & Li, H.-L. (2020). A robust optimization model for stochastic logistic problems. International Journal of Production Economics, 64(1-3), 385-397
. Zeng, J., An, M., & Smith, N. J. (2017). Application of a fuzzy based decision making methodology to construction project risk assessment. International journal of project management, 25(6), 589-600