• Home
  • زهرا فهرستی
  • OpenAccess
    • List of Articles زهرا فهرستی

      • Open Access Article

        1 - Investigating jurisprudent basis responsibility results of Crona virus spreading
        masooma rezaee zahra Fehreste
        Crona virus is a new desease which has caused many people to die in a short time and this transmitters play an important and basic role in spreading this virus. Investigating this virus in jurisprudence point of view makes a challenge that what is the lawful and jurispr More
        Crona virus is a new desease which has caused many people to die in a short time and this transmitters play an important and basic role in spreading this virus. Investigating this virus in jurisprudence point of view makes a challenge that what is the lawful and jurisprudent results of viruse transmission to the others? If transmitter have committed to a crime and he /she must be punished? or must pays penalties and compensates the losses? It does have various aspects and every which does have certain law. It could be possible that he / she intentionally, transmits virus to the others consciously or unintentionally does that inadvertently and causes the others to die According to jurisprudence basic, making losses or damages, except for exceptions , is considered as crime and considering it is intentionally or else, leads to punishment or penalties. Recently, some of the religious authorities started to give idea of this important point and noted that transmitters are responsible for penalties and medical costs if he/ she does that carelessly. In this article which has done based on library method, it is attempted to provide accurate and credit answer base on jurisprudent - lawful literature according to jurisprudent basis Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        2 - Jurisprudential-legal analysis of donating organs of those sentenced to death
        Elahe Sadeghi zahra Fehreste
        Nowadays, organ transplant is an inevitable necessity for patients who cannot be treated by other medical treatments. Nevertheless, it has become one of the major challenges of societies to find enough transplantable organs in order to bring patients back to society and More
        Nowadays, organ transplant is an inevitable necessity for patients who cannot be treated by other medical treatments. Nevertheless, it has become one of the major challenges of societies to find enough transplantable organs in order to bring patients back to society and their families. The attention of organ transplant experts and jurists has been drawn to finding new sources for organ donation, because of restrictions on member donors despite the increase in people in need of organ transplants. One of the most important resources of organ transplants is the organs of people sentenced to death. The present study aims to analyze the jurisprudential point of view regarding to the organ donation of those sentenced to death and retribution, by studying primary religious resources and regulations based on documentary method. This jurisprudential view emphasizes that the punishment for those sentenced to death and execution need not be the same. This view considers the execution and retribution of convicts possible by removing their vital organs under anesthesia. Donation of non-vital organs of people sentenced to retribution can also be considered as another source of providing organs for transplantation, if he obtains the consent of his parents. This donation can lead to discount of his punishment. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        3 - Feasibility study of custody agreement from the perspective of Iranian jurisprudence and legal system
        SEYEDE TAHERE SEYED NASEREDINY EBRAHIM YAGHOUTI zahra Fehreste
        The right of custody and custody of a child is one of the rights and duties of parents, which the law has made subject to its own provisions for boys and girls up to the age of 7 and 9, and has recognized this right for the mother; And has since recognized this right fo More
        The right of custody and custody of a child is one of the rights and duties of parents, which the law has made subject to its own provisions for boys and girls up to the age of 7 and 9, and has recognized this right for the mother; And has since recognized this right for the father. Among these, the effect of the agreement on the right of custody is one of the issues that are considered as a violation of the rule of law or an exception to the rule of law. The purpose of this study is to examine consensual custody and determine its scope. Behind this approach, some judicial theories have been criticized, and the effect of the agreement is where the law does not specify the minimum status. Therefore, the approach of this study follows the effect of agreement on custody after the ages mentioned. Findings of this study include the effect of consent on custody after the age of 7 and 9 years, and regarding artificial insemination, if it is laboratory and the identity of the sperm owner is not known, it is possible to agree on custody, otherwise only for the natural mother of the child. It is and is natural for the father when his identity is clear. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        4 - Feasibility of pursuing the assassination of Sardar Soleimani in the International Criminal Court and the International Court of Justice and Domestic Law
        Fatemeh Aghamiri zahra Fehreste Ebrahim Yaghouti
        The Military Action Of The United States Of America In Martyring The High-Ranking Military Officials Of The Country Of Iran, Qassem Soleimani, On January 3, 2020, The Issue That Was Raised Among Iranian And International Lawyers From The beginning Was The Legal Response More
        The Military Action Of The United States Of America In Martyring The High-Ranking Military Officials Of The Country Of Iran, Qassem Soleimani, On January 3, 2020, The Issue That Was Raised Among Iranian And International Lawyers From The beginning Was The Legal Response Of Islamic Republic Of Iran Government To This Incident. Contrary To What It Claims, The American Military Action In This Incident Does Not Comply With Preventive Or Preemptive Elements And The Conditions Of Legitimate Defense And Is An International Violation. The Feasibility Of Judicial Pursuit Of Criminal Liability And Civil Liability Resulting From This Illegal Act In The International Criminal Court And The International Court Of Justice Is The Subject Of This Article. Despite The Non-Membership Of Iran And The United States In The Statute Of The International Criminal Court, Iran Can, By Persuading The Iraqi Government To Accept The Court's Case Jurisdiction, Provide The Possibility Of Exercising The Court's Jurisdiction Over This Case, But Even In This Case, The Case Of The Assassination Of Lt. Gen. Soleimani Cannot Be Pursued Within The Framework Of One Of The Four Crimes Under The Court's Jurisdiction. The Most Effective Legal Mechanism Is Pursuing The Civil Responsibility Of The American Government For This Criminal Act According To The "Convention On The Prevention And Punishment Of Crimes Against Internationally Protected Persons, Including Political Missionaries" (1973), Which The Governments Of Iran And The United States Are Members Of. And Also Preventing The Establishment Of A Mixed International Court, Especially Through The Conclusion Of An Agreement Or The General Assembly Of The United Nations Or The Organization Of Islamic Cooperation. This Convention Prohibits The Commission Of Certain Crimes, Including Murder, Against Persons Under International Protection. It Has Predicted A Dispute Resolution Mechanism That Will Eventually End Up In The International Court Of Justice. Manuscript profile