The Study of Animus Archetype in Zhaleh Ghaemmaghami's Poems

Subject Areas : Woman and Society

Ghodratollah Alirezaii ¹ , Gholamreza Salemian ² , fateme kolahchian ³ , jahangir Karami ⁴

1 - PhD Student in Persian Language and Literature, Department of Persian Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Razi University, Kermanshah, IranKermanshah, Iran
2 - Professor, Department of Persian Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
3 - Associate Professor, Department of Persian Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
4 - Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

Received: 2020-02-07 Accepted : 2021-10-10 Published : 2021-10-23

Keywords: Jung, Archetypes, Animus, Contemporary Poetry, Jaleh Ghaem maghami,

Abstract :

Jung, considers the subconscious mind of man to be the female and male cross-poles of Anima and Animus. Anima's archetype is half feminine in the male psyche and Animus is half masculine in the female psyche. These archetypes are influenced by the relationships and behaviors of the family, especially the parents, in the presence of each individual, and can change his personality under the circumstances of his community and life. The oneness and homogeneity of these archetypes will cause human development, and the domination of each of these cross-poles in the individual will make a series of traits and characters that can be studied from a psychological perspective. These images are unconsciously depicted in the works of artists. GhaemMaghami,as a contemporary lady poet, has also unconsciously expressed these archetypes in his poems in various ways (positively and negatively). the frequency of positive aspect of animus is higher than that of negative side In her poems,74.74% of findings presents positive aspects of animus and25.26% of findings indicates negative aspects of animus. The initial formation of these archetypes is positive when she is single, but after marriage and quitting her child because of the divorce , the negative presentations begin to realize.

References:

1.       Shamisa S. (1999). Literary Criticism. Tehran: Ferdows.

2.       Salmaninejad Mehrabadi S, Sayf A, Mousavand N. (2013). Analyzing the whiteness and howeness of appearance of ancient models Anima and Animus in Tahereh Saffarzadeh’s poems. Journal of Women in Culture and Art;4(1):107–26.

3.       Moreno A. (2011).  Jung, Gods and Modern Man. Dariush Mehrjui, Translator. Tehran: Center Publishing.

4.       Jung CG. (1998). Man and his Symbols. Mahmoud Soltaniye, Translator. Tehran: Jami.

5.       Abbott P, Wallace C. (2007). Feminist Perspective. Manije Najm Iraqi, Translator. Tehran: Ney.

6.       Sarfi MR, Madbberi M, Alinejad M. (2017). Investigation of Animusical Effects in the Poems of Forough Farrokhzad, Simin Behbahani, Tahereh Safarzadeh. Studies in Lyrical Language and Literature; 6(20):31–42.

7.       GhaemMaghami A. (1995). Divan Almataj GhaemMaghami. Tehran: Ma.

8.       Kamali Bonyani MR, Towhidifar N. (2013). Animus Jung’s Exemplary Form in Sushoun’s Novel. Comparative Literature Studies;7(25):73–93.

9.       Pouladi M, Hemati AH, Ghodousi K. (2018). A Comparative Study of the Anima and Animus Archetype in the Poems of Simin Behbahani and Ghadat Al-Seman. Comparative Literature Review;(26):1–20.

10.    Johnson RA. (2016). Lying with the heavenly woman: understanding and integrating the feminine archetypes in mens lives. Tourajreza Banisadr, Translator. Tehran: Liusa.

11.    Sarfi MR. (2003).An Introduction to Symbolism in Literature. Journal of Culture;1(2):159–77.

12.    Pouralkhas S, Eshghi J. (2014). Manifestations of Animus Archetype in Persian Literature. Mytho-Mystic Literature Journal;10(35):63–89.

13.    Ordoubadi A. (1976). Carl Gustav Jung’s School of Analytical Psychology and his latest interviews with him. Shiraz: University of Shiraz.

14.    Jung CG. (2006). The Spirit and Life, . Latif Sediqiani, Translator. Tehran: Jami.

15.    Jung CG. (1991). Psychology and Religion. Mohammad Hossein Sarvari, Translator. Tehran: Sokhan.

16.    Jung CG. (2014). Self unknown. Mehdi Ghaeni, Translator. Tehran: Jami.

17.    Snowden R. (2014). Jung: The Key Ideas. Afsane Shaykholeslamzade, Translator. Tehran: Ataei.

18.    Jung CG. (2012). World Journey. Jalal Sattari, Translator. Tehran: Toos.

19.    Bolen JS. (2005). Goddesses in Everywoman: A New Psychology of Woman. Azar Yousefi, Translator. Tehran: Roshangaran and motaleat zanan.

20.   Chevalier J-AG. (2008). Dictionnaire Des Symbols. Sudabah Fazayeli, Translator. Tehran: Jayhoun.