Work Culture among Rural Women (By Studying Rural Women in Northern Boyerahmad Area)
Subject Areas : Regional Planning
Ehsan Farzin Abdehgah
1
(PhD Candidate in Organizational Behavior, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran)
Sara farzaneh
2
(PhD Candidate in Organizational Behavior, University of Tehran, Iran)
Raha Talebi Ardakani
3
(PhD Candidate in cultural policy, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran)
Keywords: Village, Work Culture, Phenomenology, Female Conception, Boyerahmad Area,
Abstract :
The purpose of this study is to recognize the concept of rural women from the work culture. The statistical population includes all women living in the villages of Creek and Tang-e-Sarez in Boyerahmad County. The methodology and theoretical foundations are phenomenology. The sampling method is purposeful and the number of interviews ended on the basis of theoretical saturation logic to 41 interviews. According to the findings, the five main categories of research are: the physical dimension of labor (in terms of physical health for young women; and the burnout and aging of the face and the hard memory of old women for years), the economic dimension of work (real work means jobs Income generation), gender dimension of labor (participation in income-related activities in the sense of helping a spouse, rather than participation in the family economy), psychological dimension of work (increased adaptability, motivation, positive self-concept, life expectancy and learning), social dimension of work (network expansion Communication and collective activities, access to supportive resources and recognition as a source of support).of work (real work means jobs Income generation), gender dimension of labor (participation in income-related activities in the sense of helping a spouse, rather than participation in the family economy), psychological dimension of work (increased adaptability, motivation, positive self-concept, life expectancy and learning), social dimension of work (network expansion Communication and collective activities, access to supportive resources and recognition as a source ofCommunication and collective activities, access to supportive resources and recognition as a source of support).Communication and collective activities, access to supportive resources and recognition as a source of support).
1. Ahmadi, S & Rusta, L. (2011), Comparative study of women's and men's work culture, Women and Society Magazine, 2(2). [In Persian]
2. Ali Abadi, V; Atai, P; Gholamrezaei, S. (2020), The relationship between the personality type of rural women and their success in home businesses: the application of the DISC model. Scientific-Research Quarterly of Regional Planning, 10(39). [In Persian]
3. Fakuhi, N. (2002), Identity formation and local, national and global patterns (Lorestan Province case study), Iranian Journal of Sociology, 4(4). [In Persian]
4. Gholamrezaei, Su; Gholamrezaei, Si; Bluri Al-Kran, Z. (2010), Investigation of the impact of social dimensions of work culture on women's productivity in the Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs, Journal of Work and Society, No. 125 and 126. [In Persian]
5. Holmes, M. (2008), Gender in everyday life, translated by Mohammad Mehdi Labibi, Tehran: Naqhde Afkar publishing company. [In Persian]
6. Jafari, M & Habibi, M. (2009), Work culture, Tadbir, year 31. [In Persian]
7. Jamshidi, M. (2002), Rural Development Consequences for Women: A Case Study of Eqlid City, Master's Thesis, Shiraz University. [In Persian]
8. Jazani, N. (2004), estimating the value of women's domestic work, research project of Shahid Beheshti University and Women's Participation Office. [In Persian]
9. Maggi-Ham, S. (2003), The Culture of Feminist Ideas, translated by Firouze Mohajer, Farrokh-Qhare-Daghi, Noushin Ahmadi-Khorasani, Tehran: Development Publications.
10. Majnouni Totakhana, A, Khaleghi, A. (2019), Futuristic research of rural development planning (case study: Varzeghan city). Regional planning scientific-research quarterly. [In Persian]
11. Mashhadi Ahmad, M. (2015), Old institutionalism and conventional economy; an intellectual debate. Economic research paper. 15(57). PP. 1-38. [In Persian]
12. Olyaei, M. (2002), study of the economic-social and cultural characteristics of rural women and its relationship with their share in the household income: the case of Divandare city, Master's Thesis, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Unit. [In Persian]
13. Pourtoroq, M. (2001), structures affecting the participation of rural women in the activities of livestock affairs and rural industries in Hormozgan province, Master's thesis, Shiraz University. [In Persian]
14. Pouryousofi, H; Fathi, S; Poryousofi, (2012), Investigation of factors affecting work culture among female workers in the industry sector, Scientific-Research Quarterly of Women's Sociology, 3(1). PP. 152-135. [In Persian]
15. Safiri, Kh & Imanian, S. (2010), Sociology of Gender, Tehran: Sociologists Publishing.
16. Statistical yearbook of the country 2018. (2020), Statistical Center of Iran. Tehran: Directorate of Public Relations and International Cooperation. [In Persian]
17. Tavasoli, Gh. (2009), Sociological Theories, Tehran: Samt Publications. [In Persian]
18. Tavasoli, Gh. (2014), Sociology of Work and Occupation, Tehran: Samt Publications. [In Persian]
19. Acs, Zoltan. & Audretsch, D. (2003), Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research: An Interdisciplinary Survey and Introduction, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
20. Alwani, M., & Budlai, H. (2010), Phenomenology in Entrepreneurship Studies, Iranian. Journal of Management Sciences, 5(19). [In Persian]
21. Bann, C. L. (2007), Entrepreneurial Lives: A Phenomenological Study of the Lived Experience of the Entrepreneur, Including the Influence of Values, Beliefs, Attitudes, and Leadership in the Entrepreneurial Journey. (Doctoral Dissertation). Available From Pro Quest Dissertations and Theses Database. (UMI No. 3244893).
22. Bernstein, Richard, J. (1976), The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
23. Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (2007), Sociological paradigms and organizational. Analysis. London: Heinemann. Translated by Mohammad Taghi Nowrozi, Tehran: Samt Publications. [In Persian]
24. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2006), Guide to conducting qualitative researches. Translated by Beyuk Mohammadi, Tehran: Research Institute of Human Sciences. [In Persian]
25. Edgarh, Schein, (1999), Corporate Culture Survival Guide, Jossey, Bass Publishers, San Francisco.
26. Habibi, Mahmoud. (1983), Management, Culture and Fruition, Tadbir Magazine, No. 76, 61. [In Persian]
27. Moustakas, C. E. (1994), Phenomenological Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
28. Rapport, F., & Wainwright, P. (2006), Phenomenology as a paradigm of movement, Nursing Inquiry, 13(3), PP. 228-236.