The effect of phosphate solublizing bacteria as a novel probiotic on some biochemical parameters, carcass characteristics and performance of broiler chicks

Subject Areas : Veterinary Clinical Pathology

مهدی Ghaderi Jouybari ¹ ( Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Islamic Azad University, Ghaemshahr Branch, Ghaemshahr, Iran )
M.A Malbobi ² ( Department of Biotechnology, National Institute of Gene Engineering and Biotechnology, Tehran, Tehran, Iran )
مهرداد Irani ³ ( Department of Animal Science, Islamic Azad University, Ghaemshahr Branch, Ghaemshahr, Iran )
وحید Rezaei Pour ⁴ ( Department of Animal Science, Islamic Azad University, Ghaemshahr Branch, Ghaemshahr, Iran )
مهدی Mohammad Zadeh Nagharchi ⁵ ( Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Islamic Azad University, Ghaemshahr Branch, Ghaemshahr, Iran )

Received: 2009-01-09 Accepted : 2009-08-23 Published : 2009-05-22

Keywords: Broiler, Probiotic, alkaline phosphatase, phosphate solublizing bacteria,

Abstract :

In this study, the effect of Pseudomonas Putida and Pantoa Agglomerans which belong to phosphate solublizing bacteria was investigated as a probiotic on serum concentrations of phosphorous and alkaline phosphatase, some carcass characteristics and performance of broiler chicks. These bacteria, which were isolated with screening soil samples collected from various regions of Iran, were mixed with the diet. The experiment was conducted on a completely randomized design and a 2×4 factorial arrangement. The factors consisted of 4 probiotic levels (1-no probiotic use, 2- probiotic use through out rearing, 3- probiotic use at the start of rearing and during growth period, 4- probiotic use at the end of the rearing period) and 2 phosphorus levels (1-available, 2-total). In this experiment, 8 treatments, 4 replicates with 20 chicks at each replicate and a total of 640 day old chicks of ROSS strain were used. Comparison of means indicated that the probiotic had significantly increased body weight, feed intake and feed conversion ratio (p<0.05). The novel probiotic had increased carcass yield and serum phosphorus (p<0.05). On the other hand, a significant decreased abdominal fat and serum alkaline phosphatase was observed (p>0.05). Also there was no significant effect on breast and thigh weight (p<0.05). The Results of this study indicated that the employed bacteria increase the performance and bioavailability of phosphorous.

References:

1. ملک زاده، ف.، صعودی، م.، و ملک زاده، ش. (1380): بیوتکنولوژی میکروبی. جلد یک انتشارات دانشگاه تهران. صفحات: 93-91.
   
   
   1. Abdul Salmankhan, A., Khaligue, T. and Pasha, N. (2000): Effect of dietary supplementation of various levels of fermatco on the performance of broiler chicks. International Journal of   Biology, 156- 853 -02 -1. 
   
   
   2. Anselme, P. (2002): There is still a place for inorganic phosphatase. Feed Mix, V. 10/ N. 3/2002.                                                                         
   
   
   3. Balachandar, J., Reddy, P.S. and Reddy, P.V.S.N. (2003): Effect of probiotics supplementation with or without enzymes on the performance of male broiler chicks. International Journal of Poultry Science, 6(4): 261-265.                                                        
   
   
   4. Denli, M., Okan, F. and Celi, K. (2003): Effect of dietary probiotic organic acid and antibiotic supplementation to diets on broiler performance and carcass yield. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 2(2): 89-91.
   
   
   5. Djouvinov, D., Biocheva, S., Simeonova, T. and Vlaikova, T. (2005): Effect of feeding lactina probiotic on performance, some blood parameters and cecal microflora of mule ducklings. Journal of science,V.3/N.2/22-28.    
   
   
   6. Fidler D.J., George, B., Quarles, C.L. and Kidd, M.T. (2003): Broiler performance and carcas traits as affected by dietary liquid saccharopolyspora soluble concentrate. Journal of Applied Poultry Resource, 12: 153-159.
   
   
   7. Kannan, D., Viswanthan, K. and Mohan, B. (2007): The Effect of feeding virginiamycin and lactobacillus sporogenes on broiler production performance characters. Journal of Veterinary & Animal Science.3 (2)1.106-108.
   
   
   8. Klein, A. and Jahreis, G. (2003): Influence of symbiotic yoghurt on the absorption of calcium and magnesium.9^th symposium of micronutrient. Paris, France.
   
   
   9. Koutsos, E.A. and Arias, V.J. (2006): Intestinal ecology: Interaction among the gastrointestinal tract, nutrition, and the microflora. Poultry Science, 15: 161-173.                                                                          
   
   
   10. NRC. (1994):  Nutrition Requirements of Poultry, 9th revised ed. National Research Council, Washington, pp: 1-47.
   
   
   11. Panda, A.K., Raju, M.V.L. and Rao, R. (2006): The essential mineral. Feed Mix. V.14/N.1/2006.
   
   
   12. SAS Institute (1993): SAS Users Guide: Statistics SAS Institute Inc, Cary.nc.
   
   
   13. Strompfova, V., Marcinakova, M., Gancarcikova, S. and Jonecova, Z. (2005): New probiotic strain lactobacillus fermantum AD1 and its effect in Japanese quail. Czech Veterinarian Medicine. (9): 415-420.
   
   
   14. Squires, E.J. (2003): Applied Animal Endocrinology. CABI Publishing. University of Guelph.
   
   
   15. Vicente, J.L., Avina, L., Torres, A., Hargis, B. and Tellez, G. (2007): Effect of a lactobacillus spp-based probiotic culture product on broiler chicks performance under commercial condition. International Journal of   Poultry Science. 6(3): 154-156.