Evaluation of 11 regions of Shiraz city in terms of urban prosperity index with FAHP model
Subject Areas :Hamidreza Daneshpour 1 , Navid Saeidi Rezvani 2 , mohammadreza Daneshpour 3
1 - Department of Urban Planning, College of Art and Architecture, West Tehran branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2 - Department of Urban Planning, College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Qazvin branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran
3 - Department of Urban Planning, College of Art and Architecture, Shiraz University, SHiraz, Iran
Keywords: Shiraz, Assessment, Urban Prosperity, 11 Regions, FAHP model,
Abstract :
Prosperity is a wide concept which has been proposed in 2012 by United Nations in relation with balanced and harmonic development in environment accompanied by fairness and justice. A kind of social construction which frames human activities. This concept has been introduced by six aspects with their sub criteria: 1. Productivity or economic growth with the basis of production, making wealth, and employment 2. Quality of life 3. Urban governance and legislation 4. Environmental sustainability 5. Equity and social participation 6.Developing infrastructure with its corresponding sub criteria. In this research, with analytical - descriptive approach the assessment and comparison of eleven Shiraz municipality regions according to urban prosperity indexes has been performed. In this case, with mentioning documentary and library resources, urban prosperity indexes has been analyzed and investigated. Therefore corresponding measures in current conditions of Shiraz would be identified. Afterwards for quantifying and gathering the data needed, from experts’ point of view, profound interviews and questionnaires has been practiced. It is necessary to say that the number of statistic samples initially defined from experts and specialists were 60 samples that finally 30 questionnaires were analyzed. For data analysis and measuring final urban prosperity number in regions, Fuzzy-AHP has been used and for weighing indexes in this model a survey has been done from experts, urban managers and researchers. The results of grading regions from urban prosperity index demonstrate that regions number 1, 6 and 10 has the most prosperity in sequence and region number 7 has the least urban prosperity rate. Also among indexes studied, efficiency with the score (0.308) and quality of life with the score (0.214) has the most impacts in the urban prosperity of the analyzed regions.
Prosperity is a wide concept which has been proposed in 2012 by United Nations in relation with balanced and harmonic development in environment accompanied by fairness and justice. A kind of social construction which frames human activities. This concept has been introduced by six aspects with their sub criteria: 1. Productivity or economic growth with the basis of production, making wealth, and employment 2. Quality of life 3. Urban governance and legislation 4. Environmental sustainability 5. Equity and social participation 6.Developing infrastructure with its corresponding sub criteria. In this research, with analytical - descriptive approach the assessment and comparison of eleven Shiraz municipality regions according to urban prosperity indexes has been performed. In this case, with mentioning documentary and library resources, urban prosperity indexes has been analyzed and investigated. Therefore corresponding measures in current conditions of Shiraz would be identified. Afterwards for quantifying and gathering the data needed, from experts’ point of view, profound interviews and questionnaires has been practiced. It is necessary to say that the number of statistic samples initially defined from experts and specialists were 60 samples that finally 30 questionnaires were analyzed. For data analysis and measuring final urban prosperity number in regions, Fuzzy-AHP has been used and for weighing indexes in this model a survey has been done from experts, urban managers and researchers. The results of grading regions from urban prosperity index demonstrate that regions number 1, 6 and 10 has the most prosperity in sequence and region number 7 has the least urban prosperity rate. Also among indexes studied, efficiency with the score (0.308) and quality of life with the score (0.214) has the most impacts in the urban prosperity of the analyzed regions.
Prosperity is a wide concept which has been proposed in 2012 by United Nations in relation with balanced and harmonic development in environment accompanied by fairness and justice. A kind of social construction which frames human activities. In this research, with analytical - descriptive approach the assessment and comparison of eleven Shiraz municipality regions according to urban prosperity indexes has been performed. In this case, with mentioning documentary and library resources, urban prosperity indexes has been analyzed and investigated. Therefore corresponding measures in current conditions of Shiraz city condition would be identified. Afterwards for quantifying and gathering needed data, from experts’ point of view, profound interviews and questionnaires has been practiced. It is necessary to say that the number of statistic samples initially defined from experts and specialists were 60 samples that finally 30 questionnaires were analyzed. For data analysis and measuring final urban prosperity number in regions Fuzzy-AHP has been used and for weighing indexes in this model a survey has been done from experts, urban managers and researchers. The results of grading regions from urban prosperity index demonstrate that regions number 1, 6 and 10 has the most prosperity in sequence and region number 7 has the least urban prosperity rate.
1) بحرینی، سید حسین، (1378): تجدد، فراتجدد و پس از آن در شهرسازی، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران
2) حسینی، سید علی، ویسی، رضا و احمدی سجاد (1391): « بررسی و تحلیل فضای سبز شهر شیراز، دوفصلنامه پژوهش های بوم شناسی شهری» ، سال سوم، شماره 1.
3) رحیمی، محمد (1396): «تجارب توانمند سازی سکونتگاههای غیر رسمی ایران و جهان، با تأکید برروشهای جلب مشارکت مردمی و تامین منابع مالی»، انتشارات آذرخش، تهران.
4) زبردست, اسفندیار: (1394)جزوه درسی روشهای ارزیابی چندمعیاری فرآیند تحلیل سلسله مراتبی(AHP) و فرآیند تحلیل شبکهای(ANP) . دانشکده شهرسازی: دانشگاه تهران.
5) سیفالدینی، فرانک و همکاران (1392): «بسترهاو چالشهای اعمال سیاست رشد هوشمند شهری، نمونهی موردی: خرمآباد لرستان»، فصلنامه جغرافیا و برنامهریزی شهری چشم انداز زاگرس، سال ششم، شماره 19.
6) قدسیپور، سیدحسن (1379): مباحثی در تصمیمگیری چندمعیاره، فرآیند سلسله مراتبی، دانشگاه صنعتی امیرکبیر.
7) محتشمی، نگار، مهدوینژاد، محمدجواد، بمانیان، محمدرضا (1395): «عوامل رشد و موانع بازدارندهی شکوفایی شهری» دومین همایش کنفرانس بینالمللی دستاوردهای نوین پژوهشی در عمران و مدیریت شهری.
8) مرکزآمار ایران، 1395: سرشماری رسمی نفوس و مسکن سال 1395.
9) Aromar R., Rosenzweig C.(2013): The Urban Opportunity: Enabling Transformative and Sustainable Development, Backpround Research Paper Submitted to tha High Level Panel On the Post -2015 Development Agenda.
10) Bowen, W. (1993): AHP: Multiple Criteria Evaluation, in Klosterman, R.et al (Eds), Spreadsheet Models for Urban and Regional Analysis. New Brunswick: Center for Urban Policy Research.
11) Easterlin, R. A. (1974): "Does Economic Growth Improve the Hunan Lot? Some Empirical Evidence”, In David, P.A.and M.W.Reder (eds.)Nations and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honor of Moses Abramowitz
12) Mikhailov.L., Tsvetinov. P.( 2004 ): Evaluation of services using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Applied Soft Computing.
13) UN-Habitat. (2012): "State of the World's Cities Report 2012/2013: Prosperity Of Cities”, United Nations Humman Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT), Nairobi.
14) Un- Habitat. (2016): “The City Prosperity Initiative”, United Nations Human Settlements Programme, London: Earthscan.
15) Lee, A.H.I., Chen, W.C., Chang , C.J. A ) 2008( : fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of IT department in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan. Expert Systems with Applications.
16) Jeganathan, C. (2003): Development of Fuzzy Logic Architecture to Access the Sustainability of the Forest Management. MSc. thesis. Enschede, ITC.
17) UNDP (1998): Capacity Asseessment and Devwlopment: In a Systems and Strategic Management Context, Technical Advisory Paper No. 3, Management Development and Governance Division, Bureau for Development Policy, UNDP: New York, USA,
18) Un-Habitat(2016):The city prosperity initiative-Metropolitan Cities, September.
19) M.Sohail Khan(2004): Tools For Pro – Poor Municipal Public Private Partnerships, UNDP,
_||_