The Relationship between Imam Relief Committee Policies and Economic Empowerment Indicators for Rural Covered Households Case Study: Central District of Guilan Province

Subject Areas : Rural and nomadic studies

Alireza Mohammadi ¹ , Teymour Amar ² , Nasrollah Molaeihashjin ³

1 - PhD Student in Geography and Rural Planning, Department of Geography, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran
2 - Associate professor, Department of Geography, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran
3 - Professor Department of Geography, Rasht Branch ,Islamic Azad University, Rasht , Iran

Received: 2019-11-11 Accepted : 2020-03-16 Published : 2022-11-22

Keywords: Rural Development, empowerment, Khomeini Relief Foundation, social empowerment,

Abstract :

Empowerment is one of the new ways of development aimed at improving performance, increasing productivity, capacity utilization and preparing for future challenges.The term 'empowerment' generally means the capacity of the individual or group to determine their own affairs. The term has been widely used in a variety of fields including psychology, management, education, women's studies and sociology. In this research the issue of economic empowerment of rural households covered by Imam Relief Committee regarding the main policies of this committee in the central area of Guilan province using was studied using questionnaire technique by the number of 345 cases.Based on the results of the study, among the two indicators studied in the economic sector, which were qualitatively examined through the Likert spectrum, the subsistence level of households with a mean score of 2.52 is better than the financial independence index. In second place is the level of financial independence of clients with a mean score of 2.45.Based on the results of the study, among the four policies studied, Satisfaction with the credit guidance policy of targeting subsidies to households with a mean score of 2.78 is ranked first. In second place is satisfaction with insurance service policy with average score of 2.67. Satisfaction with the policies of rural housing provision and repayment of credit are also ranked third and fourth with average scores of 2.61 and 2.53..

References:

طاهرخانی، مهدی. (1385). رابطه شهر و روستا در ایران، جزوه کلاس درس، رابطه شهر و روستا، گروه جغرافیا دانشگاه تربیت مدرس.

حسینی، نسیبه. (1393). تحلیل فضایی عوامل مؤثر بر توانمندسازی اقتصادی و اجتماعی خانوارهای روستایی، پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، استاد راهنما: صادق اصغری لفمجانی، دانشگاه زابل.

محمدی یگانه، بهروز؛ چراغی، مهدی و احمدی، کبری. (1393). بررسی اثرات اعتبارات خرد بر توانمندسازی اقتصادی فقرای روستایی. جغرافیا و توسعه، 12(35)، 233-247.

عنابستانی، علی اکبر؛ شایان، حمید؛ خسروبیگی، رضا  و تقی­لو، علی اکبر. (1390). نقش ویژگی های مکانی- فضایی مشارکت در توانمندسازی اقتصادی روستایی. مجله برنامه ریزی منطقه­ای، 1(4)، 1-13.

غفاری، غ. دارابی، ح. و جهانگیری، پ. (1388). بررسی شاخص­های توانمندسازی با تاکید بر زنان سرپرست خانوار. دومین همایش توانمندسازی و توانمندسازی زنان سرپرست خانوار، تهران.

رضوی، محمد رضا. (1384). بکارگیری رویکردها و تکنیک های مشارکتی گام Xa به سمت ظرفیت سازی سازمانی و توانمندسازی مردم در جوامع محلی، چهارمین کارگاه آموزشی مشارکت کشاورزان در مدیریت شبکه های آبیاری و زهکشی، تهران، کمیته ملی آبیاری و زهکشی.

شریفی، ممحمد امین؛ اسدی، علی؛ کلانتری، خلیل و آگاهی، حسین. (1389). عوامل مؤثر بر خودکفایی خانوارهای زن سرپرست مطالعه موردی خانوارهای استان کردستان. فصلنامه مطالعات زنان جامعه شناسی و روانشناسی، 8(4)، 121-141.

کیمیایی، س.ا (1390). روش های مورد استفاده برای توانمندسازی زنان سرپرست خانوار. رفاه اجتماعی، 11(40)، 63-92.

Cranwell, M. R. et al (2005). A model food entrepreneur assistance and education program: the northeast center for food entreprenerurship. Journal of food Science Education, 4(4), 56-65.

 

Jackson, M. A. (2010). Empowering Women of Nepal: An experience of empowerment in the land of the Himalaya.

 

Anderson, K., & Sandmann, L. (2009). Toward a model of empowering practices in youth-adult partnerships. Journal of Extension. 47(2), 25-34.

 

Beeton, S. (2006). Community development through tourism. Landlinks Press.

 

Bowen, R., & Lawler, S. (2009). Learning Approach to Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development: Reflection from Hawkesbury. University of Western Sydney, 155-159.

 

Evans. E.N. (2010). Liberation Theology.Empowerment Theory and Social Work Practice with the Oppressed International Social Work, 234- 235.

 

Horrel, S., & Krishnan, P., (2006). Poverty and Productivity in Female Headed Households in Zimbabwe. Journal of Development Studies, 38(5), 327-341.

 

Jackson, M.A. (2010). Empowering Women of Nepal: An experience of empowerment in the land of the Himalaya. (Doctoral dissertation, Prescott College).

 

Malhotra. A., (2003). Conceptualizing and Measuring Women’s Empowerment as a Variable in International Development.Paper was presented at the Workshop on Measuring Empowerment: Cross-Disciplinary PerspectivesWashington DC: The World Bank. 1-5.

 

McMillan. C.L., O’Gorman. K.D., & MacLaren. A.C. (2009). Commercial Hospitality: A Vehicle for the Sustainable Empowerment of Nepali Women. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 23(2),189-208.

 

Mirka, M.R. (2005). Agri business & entrepreneurship. GDC Rural Research Foundation.

 

OECD. (2012). Women’s economic empowerment. 2-4.

 

Scheyvens. R. (2003). Local Involvement in Managing Tourism. In S. Singh, D. Timothy, & R. Dowling.Tourism in Destination Communities, (229-252). CAB International.

 

Timothy, D.J. (2007). Empowerment and stakeholder participation in tourism destination communities. In A. Church, & T. Coles, Tourism, Power and Space (pp. 199-216). LONDON AND NEW YORK: Routledge.

 

Tremblay, C. & Gulberlet, J. (2010). Empowerment trough particpution: ussessingthe voies of leaders from recyeling cooperatires in Sao Paulo, Brazil, oxford university pres and community development journal. PP: 3.