Presentation of Causal Model for Learning Model Dimensions Based on Achievement Motivation by Mediating Self-Efficacy

Subject Areas : Tectonostratigraphy

L. Rezaee ¹ , H. Ahadi ² , H. Asadzadeh ³

1 - دانشجوی دکتری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات تهران، گروه روانشناسی تربیتی، تهران، ایران
2 - استاد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات تهران، گروه روانشناسی، تهران، ایران
3 - دانشیار، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، گروه روانشناسی تربیتی، تهران ، ایران

Received: 2015-11-09 Accepted : 2015-11-09 Published : 2015-08-23

Keywords: Learning model dimension, Achievement Motivation, Self- Efficacy,

Abstract :

The goal of the present study, in the framework of a causal model, was to examine the relationship between Self-efficacy, achievement motivation and learning model dimensions. The statistical population was consisted of high school students (public school) in Tehran academic year 2013-2014. Among them 734(374 females, 360 males) were selected by using random cluster sampling method. The research instruments included Kolb learning Styles Inventory, Sherer Self-efficacy scale, Hermans Achievement Motivation Test. The reliability and validity coefficients of Instruments were approved, The hypothetical model tested by using correlation matrix and structural equation modeling. Therefore, causal relationship among learning model dimensions construct, self-efficacy and achievement motivation through designing of model was tested based on theatrical and empirical foundation. Test of final model showed that all of fitness index were in acceptable range. And default model fits sample data completely. Approximately 35 percent of variance achievement motivation and 90 percent of self-efficacy were explained by existing variables.

References:

1. اکبری، بهمن. (1386). روایی و اعتبار آزمون انگیزش پیشرفت هرمنس بر روی دانش­آموزان دوره متوسطه استان گیلان، مجله دانش و پژوهش در علوم تربیتی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد خوارسگان (اصفهان) 6. صص96-73.


2. جهانی ملکی، سیف الله. (1388). رابطه بین سطح آگاهی از مهارت زندگی با باورهای خودکارآمدی در دانشجویان دانشگاه بهشتی. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی


3. سیف، ع. ا. (1390). روان شناسی پرورشی ویراست ششم. تهران: دوران.


4. عباسیان فرد، م. بهرامی، ه. و احقر، ق. (1389). رابطه خودکارآمدی با انگیزش پیشرفت در دانش آموزان دختر پیش دانشگاهی. فصلنامه روان شناسی کاربردی، 1(13)، 109-95.


5. کافی، س. م. (1389). مقابسه سازگاری تحصیلی در بین دانشجویان دختر و پسر دانشگاه گیلان. تازه­ها و پژوهش­های مشاوره، 36، 140-127.


6. هاشمی، ز. و لطیفیان، م. (1390). ارتباط بین پنج عامل شخصیت و سبک­های یادگیری در میان دانشجویان دختر و پسر دانشکده­های علوم انسانی و فنی-مهندسی دانشگاه شیراز.  مجله روان­شناسی تربیتی، 4، 114-91.
   
   
   1. Azevedo, R. E., & Akdere, M. (2010). Measuring the effects of learning styles: is a little knowledge dangerous for excellence in management eduction?. Journal of Leadership & Organizational studies, 17(2), 192-200.
   
   
   2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   
   
   3. Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of New General Self-efficacy Scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4(1), 62-68.
   
   
   4. Chou, H. W., & Wang, T. B. (2000). The influence of learning styleand training method on self-efficacy and learning performance inwww homepage design training. International Journal ofInformation Management, 20, 455–472.
   
   
   5. Hein, T. L., &Budny D. D. (1999). Teaching to Students' Learning Styles: Approaches That Work. 29th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conferenc, November 10-13, San Juan, Pueto Rico.
   
   
   6. Husch, S. (2001). An Investigation of Relationships between Learning Styles, Personality Temperaments, Matematics Self-Efficacy, and Post-Secondary Calcuts Achievement. PhD. Dissertation, the University of  Tennessee, Knoxville.
   
   
   7. Joy, S., & Kolb, D. A. (2009). Are there cultural differences in learning style? International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 33, 69-85.
   
   
   8. Kolb. A. Y., & Kolb. D. A. (2005). The Kolb Learning Style inventory 3.1. 2005. Tehincal Specifications Boston MA: Hay Resources Direct,
   
   
   9. Narciss, S. (2004). The Impact of Informative Tutoring Feedback and Self-efficacy on Motivation and Achievement in Concept Learning. Original Research Article Experimental Psychology, 51(3), 28-214.
   
   
   10. Ozkan, S. (2003). The Roles of motivational beliefs and learning styles on tenth grade students biology achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 24, 131-135.
   
   
   11. Ozgen,K., Tataroglua, B., &Alkana, H. (2011). An examination of brain dominance and learning styles of pre-service mathematics teachers. Journal Procedia Social and BehavioralSciences ,15, 743–750.
   
   
   12. Pajares, F., & Miller, M. D. (1994). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept belifes in mathematical problem solving. Journal of Consuling Psychology Education Psychology, 28, 117-148.
   
   
   13. Pintrich P. R., &Degroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learningcomponents of classroom academic performance. Jornal of Educational psychologe, 82(1), 33-40.
   
   
   14. Platsidou, M., &Metalldou, P. (2009). Validity and reliability Issues of two learning Style Inventories in a Greek Sample: Kolb's Learning Style in ventory and Felde&Solman's Index of Learnin Styles. IntermationalJournal of Teaching and Learning In Higher Education, 20, 324-335.
   
   
   15. Verma,B.P.,&Gupta,M.(1996). Modes and styles of learning as functions of personality  and motivation. Journal Psycho-lingua ,26, 37-42.
   
   
   16. Zacharis, N. Z. (2011). The effect of learning style on preference of web-based courses andlearningoutcomes . British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 790-800.