constructing and validating of aesthetic intelligence Test

Subject Areas : Psychological Models and Methods

khosro rashid ¹ , فضل الله Hassanvand ² , abolghasem yaghobi ³

1 - استادیار دانشکده روان‌شناسی دانشگاه بوعلی سینا همدان
2 - آموزگار
3 - دانشیار دانشکده روان‌شناسی دانشگاه بوعلی سینا همدان

Received: 2015-08-28 Accepted : 2018-04-08 Published : 2018-02-20

Keywords: "Aesthetic intelligence", "aesthetic", &quot, Factor Analysis&quot, ,

Abstract :

The purpose of this study was constructing and validating aesthetic intelligence Test. Population statistical was consisted of 10000 students of Buali sina University in 1392-‎‎1393 academic years. There were 370 ‎students selected by classified sampling method. In order to construct of questionnaire, after studying of the theoretical bases and interviews ‎with some scholars in the field of psychology and art, multipurpose questionnaire was constructed. After ‎confirming the content validity of questionnaire items, to clarification and awareness of potential problems, several people respond to it to determine ‎unintelligible phrases and words. Data were analyzed by using spss19 ‎and structural equation model in lisrel 8.8. The reliability of the questionnaire using ‎Cronbach's method was calculated 0/81. The results showed that constructed aesthetic ‎intelligence Test have three components, namely: sensational, mental - emotional and dynamic. Regarding ‎the obtained reliability and validity, the aesthetic intelligence questionnaire was suitable instrument ‎for measuring the people's aesthetic intelligence.‎

References:

- Ashayeri, H. (2014). Aesthetics in Psychology. Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences.

- Abdolmaleki, Construction of Aesthetic Sensitivity Test. Master's Thesis. Bu Ali Sina University. Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences. Educational psychology.

- Cupchick, G. C. (1986). A decade after Berlyne: New Directions in Experimental Aesthetics. Poetics, 15, 345-369.

- Diaz, D. (2002). Teaching aesthetics in high school art: A description, analysis, and evaluation of teachers' interpretations and methodologies. Unpublished dissertation. The University of Georgia.

- Dickie, G. (1997). Introduction to aesthetics: An analytic approach. Oxford University Press, 109.

- Eisner, E. W. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. New Haven, CT. Yale University Press.

- Hooman, H. A. (2008). Structural Equation Modeling Using Lisrel Software. Tehran. SAMT Publication, first edition.

- Istók, Eva . (2013). Cognitive and neural determinants of music appreciation and aesthetics. Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki.

- Leder, H., Belke, B.,Oeberst, A., Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments ;British JournalofPsychology, 95, 489-508.

- Mohajer, S. (1996). The importance of aesthetics. Literature and Languages. Chista journal. No. 130. 797- 800.

- Navis, David (2005). aesthetics, Popular art. translate: Mahdi saatchi (2011). Art and architecture: Aesthetic, No. 22, 250-224.

- Parsons, M. J.  & Blocker. H. G. (1993). Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

- Pelowski, M. & Akiba, A. (2011). A model of art perception, evaluation and emotion in transformative aesthetic experience. New Ideas in Psychology, 29, 80–97.

- Alah Rabbi, M & Sohrabi, N. (2016). Psychometric indicators of lifestyle scale. Journal of Psychological Methods and Models, 7 (26), 121-138.

- Rashid, KH., Mehrmohhamadi, M., Delavar, A and Ghatrifi, M. (2008). Studying stages of aesthetic development in Tehran students. Journal of Educational Innovations, 27(7), 123-98.

- Sigismund, R. (2000). Reasoned perception: Art education at the end of art. Unpublished dissertation. Stanford University, Palo Alto, California