Investigation of cotton mutant lines with nuclear technology response in saline water irrigation and potassium spray

Subject Areas : Journal of Plant Ecophysiology

majid jafaraghaei ¹ , Alireza Marjovvi ²

1 - researcher
2 - researcher

Received: 2018-10-15 Accepted : 2019-07-02 Published : 2020-06-21

Keywords: Yield, genotype, Cotton, Potassium,

Abstract :

This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of saline irrigation on yield and yield components of cotton genotypes. Experiments were carried out at Rudasht saline Research Station in Isfahan during 2013, 2014 and 2015. In the first year, two cotton mutant genotypes and two commercial cultivars as control were selected for the second and third years. The second year experiment was split factorial based on randomized complete block design with four replications. In this experiment, the main plots consisted of irrigation with 4 (control), 8 and 12 dS / m saline water and subplots including factorial combining of three genotypes (mutant genotype 1673, LM 1303 and Shayan) with spraying three levels of potassium sulfate (2, 4 and 6 kg / 1000 liters of water per hectare and water). The results showed that salinity of irrigated water reduced linter percentage, yield and harvest index. Among the cultivars, the highest linter percentage and its yield were observed in the LM 1303 genotype. Spraying with potassium sulfate had a positive effect on these traits and increased cotton genotypes yield under salinity conditions. The results of this study showed that in saline conditions, soluble potassium sulfate was used to reduce the effects of salinity and increase the yield of cotton genotypes. Also, the results of this study showed that the LM 1303 mutant genotype during the two years of experiment had a higher yield compared to other genotypes, and this genotype could be recommended for planting in saline areas

References:

آناقلی، ا. 1387. شاخصهای تحمل به شوری در پنبه. مجله علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی. 15(3): 82-91.

جعفرآقایی، م. و دهقانی، م. 1385. تأثیر شوری آب آبیاری بر خصوصیات کمی و کیفی پنبه. خلاصه مقالات نهمین کنگره زراعت و اصلاح نباتات ایران. تهران. ص 55.

جعفری، پ؛ و جلالی، ا.م. (1391). استفاده از پیوند جهت بهبود تحمل گوجه فرنگی به شوری در شرایط هیدروپونیک. مجله علوم و فنون کشت‌های گلخانه ای. 11: 75-67.

خواجه‌پور، م. 1375. تولید نباتات صنعتی. انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی واحد اصفهان. 250 ص.

دهقانی، م.، جعفرآقایی، م. و محمدی کیا، ص. 1392. بررسی تاثیر شوری آب آبیاری بر عملکرد و برخی اجزای عملکرد سه رقم پنبه در اصفهان. نشریه پژوهش آب در کشاورزی. 27(4): 601-610.

روشنی، ق.، قرنجیک، ع. و میرقاسمی، س. ج. 1393. پاسخ ژنوتییپهای مختلف پنبه نسبت به شوری خاک در استان گلستان. مجله پژوهشهای پنبه ایران. 2(2): 13-26.

سیدمعصومی، س.ی. 1387. تاثیر موتاسیون و برتری ژنوتیپ های موتانت پنبه به ارقام تجاری از لحاظ صفات زودرسی و عملکرد. دومین همایش ملی کاربرد فناوری هسته ای در علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی.

صفرنژاد، ع.، محمددوست، ع. ش.، حمیدی، ح. 1390.  بررسی تحمل به شوری در مرحله رشد گیاهچه‌ای گیاه دارویی کندل (Dorema ammoniacum). علوم و فنون کشت های گلخانه‌ای. 2 (5): 1- 11

کمالی، ا.، فاخری ب. و ضابط، م. 1394. بررسی اثرات تنش خشکی بر عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد پنبه با استفاده ازتجزیه بایپلات. مجله پژوهشهای پنبه ایران.3(1): 33-47.

وفایی تبار، م.، رمضانپور، س.س.، ع. حسینزاده، ح. زینالی و. 1381. بررسی روابط صفات مهم زراعی با عملکرد وش در ارقام گلاندلس پنبه از طریق روشهای آماری چند متغیره. مجله علوم کشاورزی 33(1): 103-113.

Ashraf, M. and Ahmad, S. 2000. Influence of sodium chloride onion accumulation, yield components, and fiber characteristics in salttolerant and salt-sensitive lines of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Field Crops Res. 66: 115-127.

Ayars, J.E., Hutmacher, R.B., Schoneman, R.A., Vail, S.A. and Felleke, D. 1983. Drip irrigation of cotton with saline drainage water. Trans. Americ. Soc. Agric. Engin. 29: 1668-1673.

Boumans J.H., Van Hoorn J.W., Kruseman G.P., and Tenwar B.S. 1988. Water table control, reuse and disposal of drainage water in Haryana. Agric. Water Mgmt. 14: 537-545.

Cassman, K. G. 1990. Potassium nutrition effects on lint yield and fiber quality of Acala cotton. Crop Sci. 30: 672 – 677.

Davenport, R.J. and Tester, M. 2000. A weakly voltage-dependent, non-selective cation channel mediates toxic sodium influx in wheat. Plant Phys. 122: 823-834.

David C. Harper, Dayton M. Lambert, James A. Larson, C. Owen Gwathmey. 2012. Potassium carryover dynamics and optimal application policies in cotton production. Agric. Systems. 106: 84-93.

Dhindsa, R.S., C.A. Beasley, and I.P. Ting. 1975. Osmoregulation in cotton fiber. Plant Physiol. 56:394–398.

Dong H Z, Kong X Q, Li W J, Tang W, Zhang D M. 2010. Effects of plant density and nitrogen and potassium fertilization on cotton yield and uptake of major nutrients in two fields with varying fertility. Field Crops Res. 119, 106-113.

Doorenboss, J. and A. H. Kassam. 1979. Yield Response to Water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 33, Rome, Italy, pp. 88-92.

FAO.2016.stat.Faostat3.fao.org/browse/Q/Qc/E

Feiezi M. 2008. Optimum use of saline waters in cotton production. Iranian Journal of soil research (Formerly soil and water sciences). 22(2): 181-188.

Feizi, M. 1999. Water quality effects on cotton yield. Iranian Congress of Agronomy, Book of abstracts, Karaj, Iran, p. 247.

Gormus O, Yucel C. 2002. Different planting date and potassium fertility effects on cotton yield and fiber properties in the Cukurova region, Turkey. Field Crop Research, 78, 141- 149.

Halevy, J. 1976. Growth rate and nutrient uptake of two cotton cultivars grown under irrigation. Agron. J. 68:701–705.

Kafi, M. and Kham. M. A. 2008. Crop and forge production using saline waters. Daya publishers, New Dehli.

Khan, A.N., Qureshi, R.H., Ahmad, N., and Rashid, A. 1995. Response of cotton cultivars to salinity in various growth development stages. Sarhad J. Agric. 11: 729-731.

Lauchli A., Kent L.M., and Turner J.C. 1981. Physiological responses of cotton genotypes to salinity. Proc. Beltwide cotton Prod. Res. Conf. Nati- Cotton Counc. of Am. Memphis.P:40-44.

Parida AK, Das A B, Mittra B, Mohanty P. 2004. Salt-stress induced alterations in protein profile and protease activity in the mangrove, Bruguiera parviflora.L. Naturforsch. 59: 408-414.

Pettigrew WT (2008). Potassium influences on yield and quality production for maize, wheat, soybean and cotton. Physiol. Plant133(4):670-681.

Razzouk, S. and W. J. Whittington. 1991. Effects of salinity on cotton yield and quality. Field Crops Research 26: 305-314.

Rengel, Z., and P.M. Damon. 2008. Crops and genotypes differ in efficiency of potassium uptake and use. Physiol. Plant. 133:624–636.

Sairam, R. K. and A. Tyagi. 2004. Physiology and molecular biology of salinity stress tolerance in plants. CurrentScience 86: 407-421.

Saurbeck B C, Helal H M. 1990. Factors affecting the nutrient efficiency of plants. In: Bassam N E L, Bassam M, Dambroth B C, Loughman, eds., Genetic Aspects of Plant Mineral Nutrition. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, the Netherlands. pp. 361-372.

Stedute,.P, R. Albrizio, P.Giorio and G. Sorrention. 2000. Gas-exchange response and stomatal and non-stomatal limitations to carbon assimilation of sunflower under salinity. Environmental and Experimental Botany.44:243-255.

Tupper, G.R., D.S. Calhoun, and M.W. Ebelhar. 1996. Sensitivity of earlymaturing varieties to potassium deficiency. p. 625–628. In P. Dugger and D. Richter (ed.) Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., Nashville TN. 9–12 Jan. 1996. Natl. Cotton Council of Am., Memphis TN.

Zhao, D., D.M. Oosterhuis, and C.W. Bednarz. 2001. Influence of potassium deficiency on photosynthesis, chlorophyll content, and chloroplast ultrastructure of cotton plants. Photosyn. 39:103-109.