The effect of irrigation disruption and different fertilizers sources on yield and yield components of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)
Subject Areas : Journal of Plant EcophysiologyYadolah Taghizadeh 1 , Jalal Jalilian 2 , Sina Siyavash Moghadam 3
1 - کارشناسی ارشد زراعت، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران
2 - Urmia University
3 - سینا سیاوش مقدم، استادیار گروه زراعت، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران
Keywords: Foliar application, Chemical Fertilizer, Bio-fertilizer, Nano fertilizer,
Abstract :
This experiment was done as split plot based on a randomized complete blocks design with three replications in the field of Urmia University, in 2015. The main plot was irrigation disruption at four levels including: full irrigation, irrigation disruption at heading, flowering and grain filling stages and different sources of fertilizer comprised of control, water spray, foliar application of Nano, chemical fertilizer, bio-fertilizer application and combined application of fertilizers [Nano + chemical + bio-fertilizer], were assigned as subplot. Results showed that in control plants under irrigation disruption at heading stage the capsule number per plant and oil yield was decreased 52.25 and 62.6 percent in compared to the plants treated with combined application of fertilizers and full irrigation. Normal irrigation and combined fertilizer treatments had maximum 1000-seed weight (44.33 g) and seed yield (2526.8 kg/ha) and the lowest of 1000-seed weight (34.7g) and seed yield (1032.9 kg/ha) were obtained in plants under irrigation disruption at heading stage and application of Nano fertilizer and control, respectively. The highest harvest index (42%) was detected in irrigation disruption at the grain filling stage and combined fertilizers, and the lowest (24.33%) was observed in irrigation disruption at flowering stage followed by bio-fertilizer application. Generally, result showed that irrigation disruption during the grain filling stage and application of combined fertilizers without any significant effect on yield led to a reduction water consumption on safflower farm.
امیدی، ا. ح. 1388 .اثر تنش خشکی در مراحل رشدی مختلف بر عملکرد دانه و برخی ویژگی های زراعی و فیزیولوژیکی سه رقم گلرنگ بهاره. مجله بهزراعی نهال و بذر. جلد 25، شماره 1: 31-15.
امیدی، آ.، م. میرزاخانی و م. ر. اردکانی. 1393. ارزیابی صفات کیفی گلرنگ (.Carthamus tinctorius L) تحت تاثیر کاربرد ازتو باکتر و همزیستی میکوریزایی. نشریه بوم شناسی کشاورزی. جلد 6، شماره 2: 338-324.
خواجهپور، م. ر. 1391. گیاهان صنعتی چاپ پنجم. انتشارات دانشگاه صنعتی اصفهان. 580 ص.
ظفریان، ل.، ع. عیوضی و ف. جلیلی. 1390. اثر کودهای زیستی نیتروژنه و فسفره بر عملکرد دانه و اجزای آن در دو رقم گلرنگ (Carthamus tinctorius L.). مجله پژوهش در علوم زراعی. جلد 3، شماره12: 40-29.
عابدی باباعربی، س.، م. موحدیدهنوی، ع. یدوی و ا. ادهمی. 1390. تاثیر محلولپاشی روی و پتاسیم بر صفات فیزیولوژیک و عملکرد گلرنگ در شرایط تنش خشکی. مجله الکترونیک تولید گیاهان زراعی. جلد 4، شماره 1: صفحه 95-75.
کوهنورد، پ.، ج. جلیلیان و ع.ر. پیرزاد. 1390. اثر محلولپاشی عناصر کم مصرف بر برخی صفات زراعی گلرنگ در نظامهای زراعی رایج و اکولوژیک. مجله دانش زراعت. شماره 6: صفحه 25-15.
محسننیا، ا. و ج. جلیلیان. 1391. اثر تنش خشکی و منابع کودی بر عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد گلرنگ. نشریه بوم شناسی کشاورزی. جلد 4، شماره 3: 245-235.
موحدیدهنوی، م. و س.ع.م. مدرسثانوی. 1385. اثر محلولپاشی عناصر کم مصرف روی و منگنز بر عملکرد و اجزاء عملکرد سه رقم گلرنگ پائیزه تحت تنش خشکی در منطقه اصفهان. مجله علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی. جلد 13، ویژه نامه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات، صفحه 11-1.
Abul Hashem. M. N. Amin Majumdar. Abdul Hamid and M. M. Hossain. 1998. Drought stress on seed yield, yield attributes, growth, cell membrane stability and gas exchange of synthesized Brassica Napus L. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 180:129-136.
Bohnert, H. J and R. G. Jensen. 1996. Strategies for engineering water-stress tolerance in plants. Trends Biotechnol. 14(3):89-97.
Clavel, D., N. K. Drame, H. Roy Macauley, S. Braconnier and D. Laffray. 2005. Analysis of early responses to drought associated with field drought adaptation in four Sahelian groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Cultivars. Environ Exper. Bot. 54: 219-230.
Feyzollahzadeh, M., A. ModaresMotlagh and A. M. Nikbakht. 2014. Effect of irrigation and nutrient on physical properties of safflower seeds. Int. Agrophys. 28:7-14.
Guo Yahai, X and L. Lianlu. 1992. The relations between yield formation and development of flowering parts as well as growth of branches and leaves. IIIth International Safflower Conf. Beijing, China. Pp: 465-477.
Hashemi Dezfouli, A. 1994. Growth and yield of safflower as affected by drought stress. Crop Research Hisar. 7:313-319.
Hayashi, H and K. Hanada. 1985. Effects of soil water deficit on seed yield and yield components of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) plants. JPN. J. Crop Sci. 54: 346-352.
Horwitz, W. (2000). Official methods of analysis of the AOAC international. 18th ed. Gaithersburg, MD, AOAC International.
Kazi, B. R., F. C. Oad, G. H. Jamro, L. A. Jamali and N. L. Oad. 2002. Effect of water stress on the growth, yield and oil content of sunflower. Pakistan J. Appl. Sci. 2 (5): 550-552.
Mardalipour, M., H. Zahedi and Y. Sharghi. 2014. Evaluation of Nano biofertilizer efficiency on agronomic traits of spring wheat at different sowing date. Biol. Forum Int. J. 6(2): 349-356.
Montemurro, F. 2009. Different nitrogen fertilization sources, soil tillage and crop rotations in winter wheat: effect on yield, quality and nitrogen utilization. J. Plant Nutr. 32: 1-18.
Naseri, R., A. Mirzaei and S. Vazan. 2010. Response of yield and yield components of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) to seed inoculation with Azotobacter and Azospirillum and different nitrogen levels under dry land conditions. World Appl Sci J. 11 (104): 1287-1291.
Siddique, M. R. B., A. Hamid, and M. S. Islam. 2000. Drought stress effects on water relations of wheat. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin. 41: 35-39.
Tanaka, D. L., N. R. Riveland. J. W. Bergman and A. A. Schneiter. 1997. Safflower plant development stages. IVth International Safflower Conf. Italy, Bari. 2-7 June.
Tarantino, E and E. Alba. 1978. Influence of irrigation and plant density on yield characteristics of some commercial and improved sunflower cultivars grown as a second crop. Ital. J. Agron. 12 (3): 136-142.
_||_