Comparative comparison of the intertextuality types of Gerard Genet with the theory of Islamic rhetoric in the sixteenth and seventeenth chapters of the principles of chapters in obtaining
Subject Areas : Comparative Literature StudiesSaeed Abedini 1 , Dr. Azizollah Tavakoli Kafi Abad 2 , Dr mahmoud sadeghzadeh 3
1 - PhD student of Persian language and literature, Yazd branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran
2 - Assistant Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Yazd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran
3 - Associate Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Yazd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran.-
Keywords: intertextuality, Quran, Islamic Rhetoric, Principles of Seasons, Gerard Janet's theory,
Abstract :
Today, the link between comparative literature and intertextuality is a new achievement that makes it easy to analyze the work within its patterns and methods. One of the most important elements of analysis in the field of comparative literature is the study of similarities and the effect of works on each other and how to realize or convey a subject and theme; Existence is constructed and then acquires that discourse and even changes the meaning of the central text. In the present paper, relying on the descriptive-analytical method, we make a comparative study of the intertextual aspects of genetics with the theory of Islamic rhetoric in the principles of chapters. Accordingly, the types of overt-intentional, intentional, covert, intentional and implicit intertextuals and their adaptive aspects in Islamic rhetoric, including guarantee, allegory, proverbial transmission, adaptation, contract, allusion, dissolution and implication, are examined in this work. One of the objectives of this study is to evaluate the use of previous texts based on the theory of genetics and their adaptation to the theory of Islamic rhetoric. According to the present study, the most diverse type of intertextuality is implicit intertextuality and adaptation in accordance with Islamic rhetoric. Therefore, they have the most abundant intertextual intertextuality, respectively. Hedayat's creativity in how to use the previous texts and use the intertextual element and create an innovative and creative connection between the previous texts and the present text in an artistic way will attract and convince the audience.
_||_