Simultaneous location and design of solar and wind power plants in Fars province in order to reduce greenhouse gases
Subject Areas : Energy and environmentMehdi Motevasel 1 , saman tashakor 2 , mohammad Arghavan 3
1 - Assistant Professor, Department of Renewable Energy, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
2 - Department of renewable energy, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
3 - Master of Renewable Energy Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
Keywords: Fars province, solar-wind power plant, location and design,
Abstract :
Introduction: Today, the utilization of renewable energy has not only enhanced the efficiency and effectiveness of power plants but has also resulted in a substantial reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel power plants, offering numerous environmental benefits for human societies. This research specifically focuses on harnessing the synergistic potential of solar and wind energy to achieve improved cost-efficiency and greater utilization of both resources. The study examined eight cities in Fars province, each with varying climatic conditions. Materials and Methods: The Fuzzy Hierarchy Analysis Process is employed to select the most suitable location within each of the selected cities for the construction of a power plant. To make this selection, various factors, including wind density, solar radiation, population, and susceptibility to natural disasters, are taken into account. The assessment involves the calculation of three key indicators based on mathematical relationships and environmental measurements. These indicators encompass wind density, solar radiation intensity, as well as the population and the vulnerability to natural disasters such as earthquakes, floods, and dust storms.Additionally, fuzzy logic is utilized to assign weightings and determine a single value for these three attributes. This value is computed using MATLAB software. Results and Discussion: In this research, the cities of Fars province were compared with four different criteria. According to the survey, the best cities were determined using the fuzzy hierarchical analysis method, and the results show that the best city was Euclid, followed by Safasher and Bowanat. The survey showed that the cities of Kazeroon and Firozabad have the lowest points based on the construction of wind-solar power plants. To analyze the obtained result, different criteria should be checked. It was observed that in the ranking of criteria, the score of solar and wind energy criteria is more important than the other two criteria. Conclusion: The surveys have revealed that the most suitable city for the construction of a wind-solar power plant is Eghlid, followed by Safasher, Bowanat, and Izdakhsht. Conversely, Kazeroon and Firouzabad rank lowest in terms of suitability for such power plant projects.Subsequently, the design of the power plant in the city of Optimum has been thoroughly discussed. In this context, three different operational modes have been considered: one with a 50% reliance on solar energy and 50% on wind energy, another with a 70% reliance on solar energy and 30% on wind energy, and a third with 30% solar and 70% wind energy utilization. The results indicate that the most optimal performance is achieved when 70% of the power production comes from wind turbines and 30% from the solar power plant. This approach proves to be increasingly effective as time progresses.
[1] Abdul DA, Wenq J, Tanveer AR. Prioritization of renewable energy source for electricity generation through AHP-VIKOR integrated methodology. Renewable Energy. 2022; 184: 1018-1032. doi:10.1016/j.renene. 2021.10.082. #
[2] Aghaloo K, Ali TA, Chiu Y, Sharifi A. Optimal site selection for the solar-wind hybrid renewable energy systems in Bangladesh using an integrated GIS-based BWM-fuzzy logic method. Energy Conversion and Management. 2023; 283: 116899. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2023.116899. #
[3] Badi IB, Pamučar DR, Stević Že, Muhammad LJ. Wind farm site selection using BWM-AHP-MARCOS method: A case study of Libya. Scientific African. 2023; 19: e01511. doi: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01511. #
[4] Balo FI, Şağbanşua Lü. The Selection of the Best Solar Panel for the Photovoltaic System Design by Using AHP. Energy Procedia. 2016; 100: 50-53. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2016.10.151. #
[5] Basu SO, Ogawa TA, Keiichi N. Assessing the geospatial nature of location-dependent costs in installation of solar photovoltaic plants, Energy Reports, 2021; 7(1): 4882-4894. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2021.07.068.#
[6] Devrim Y, Bilir L. Performance investigation of a wind turbineesolar photovoltaic panelsefuel cell hybrid system installed at Incek region e Ankara, Turkey. Energy Convers Management. 2016; 126: 759-766. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2016.08.062 #
[7] Hassan Z. AG, Awasthi AN. Solar PV power plant site selection using a GIS-AHP based approach with application in Saudi Arabia. Applied Energy. 2017; 206: 1225-1240. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.024. #
[8] Hasti FA, Mamkhezri JA, McFerrin RA, Pezhooli N, Optimal solar photovoltaic site selection using geographic information system–based modeling techniques and assessing environmental and economic impacts: The case of Kurdistan. Solar Energy. 2023; 262: 111807. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2023.111807. #
[9] Noorollahi YO, Ghenaatpisheh A, Fadaeia A, Simaee MO, Moltames R, A framework for GIS-based site selection and technical potential evaluation of PV solar farm using Fuzzy-Boolean logic and AHP multi-criteria decision-making approach. 2022; 186(1):89-104. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.124. #
[10] Ozdemir S, Sahin G. Multi-criteriadecision-making in the location selection for a solar PV power plant using AHP. Measurement . 2018; 129(1): 218-226. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2018.07.020. #
[11] Rios R, Duarte S. Selection of ideal sites for the development of large-scale solar photovoltaic projects through Analytical Hierarchical Process – Geographic information systems (AHP-GIS) in Peru.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2021; 149: 111310. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111310. #
[12] Rogna MA, A first-phase screening method for site selection of large-scale solar plants with an application to Italy, Land Use Policy. 2020; 99(1): 104839. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104839. #
[13] Ruiz H.S, Unarsob S,.Ibrahim-Bathisa K, Budiarto SM, GIS-AHP Multi Criteria Decision Analysis for the optimal location of solar energy plants at Indonesia. Energy Reports, 2020; 6(1): 3249-3263. doi:/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.11.198 #
[14] Sadat SA, Vakilalroaya Fini MR, Hashemi-Dezaki H, Nazififard M. Barrier analysis of solar PV energy development in the context of Iran using fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS method.
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. 2021; 47: 101549. doi:10.1016/j.seta.2021.101549.
[15] Sindhu SO, Nehra Y, Luthra SU. Solar energy deployment for sustainable future of India: Hybrid SWOC-AHP analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017; 72: 1138-1151. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.033. #
[16] Spyridonidou S, Vagiona DG. A systematic review of site-selection procedures of PV and CSP technologies. Energy Reports. 2023; 9(1): 2947-2979. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2023.01.132. #
[17] Sun YA, Zhu DA, Li YU, Wang RU, Ma RE. Spatial modelling the location choice of large-scale solar photovoltaic power plants: Application of interpretable machine learning techniques and the national inventory.Energy Conversion and Management. 2023; 289: 117198. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117198. #
[18] Wang HW, Dodd AD, Ko YE. Resolving the conflict of greens: A GIS-based and participatory least-conflict siting framework for solar energy development in southwest Taiwan. Renewable Energy. 2022; 197: 879-892. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2022.07.094. #
[19] Yum SG, Adhikari MD. Suitable site selection for the development of solar based smart hydrogen energy plant in the Gangwon-do region, South Korea using big data: A geospatial approach. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2023; Available online 21 June 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.06.024. #
[20] Zoghi M, Amir, Ehsani H, Sadat MA, Amiri MJ, Karimi S, Optimization solar site selection by fuzzy logic model and weighted linear combination method in arid and semi-arid region: A case study Isfahan-IRAN. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017; 68(2): 986-996. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.014 #