Analyzing critical success factors for the implementation of safety programs in construction projects using DEMATEL (A Case Study of the Oil and Gas Industry)
Subject Areas : Health, safety and environment
sholeh Escot
1
,
Mahnaz Zarei
2
*
1 - Department of Health, Safety, and Environmental, Shi.C., Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
2 -
Keywords: Safety Programs, Critical Success Factors (CSFs), Construction Projects, DEMATEL.,
Abstract :
|
Introduction: Safety is one of the fundamental and vital components in construction projects, especially in high-risk and sensitive industries such as oil and gas, where the occurrence of accidents can have irreparable consequences on human, financial, and environmental resources. The effective implementation of safety programs not only prevents incidents but also improves quality, increases productivity, and reduces project costs. In line with this, the primary objective of the present study is to identify and evaluate the critical success factors (CSFs) in implementing safety programs in construction projects within the oil and gas industry. To achieve this, the Iranian Offshore Engineering and Construction Company was selected as a case study in order to deeply investigate the operational conditions and challenges and to propose scientific and practical solutions for improving safety performance. Materials and Methods: This study is applied in nature and follows a survey-based data collection approach. The research was conducted between July and September 2024. For data collection, a combination of two tools was used: semi-structured interviews and a structured questionnaire. Initially, a systematic literature review was carried out to identify preliminary factors related to safety in construction projects. These factors were then incorporated into a questionnaire and presented to industry experts. Experts were selected through a snowball sampling method—beginning with several professionals with direct experience in the safety domain, who then referred additional experts to participate in the study. The identified factors were subsequently analyzed using the DEMATEL (Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory) technique to explore the causal relationships among them. The calculations related to data analysis were also performed using Excel software. |
|
|
Results and Discussion: The results of the DEMATEL analysis indicated that among the main identified dimensions, employee participation and safety management were recognized as causal factors, meaning they play a decisive role in influencing other dimensions. In contrast, safety prevention and control systems and safety commitment were identified as effect factors, meaning they are most influenced by the other dimensions. Notably, the findings revealed that safety commitment, with an importance coefficient of 4.177, played a central and crucial role in the success of safety programs and was emphasized as the most important component among other factors. Following that, the safety prevention and control system, safety management, and employee participation ranked next with importance coefficients of 4.154, 3.936, and 3.061, respectively. |
|
|
Conclusion: This study provides both practical and theoretical insights, emphasizing the importance of organizational commitment to safety and fostering a participative culture among employees. The findings can assist managers, decision-makers, and policymakers in the field of safety in oil and gas construction projects by identifying key intervention points to enhance safety performance, reduce risks, and increase the sustainability of construction activities. |
Buniya MK, Othman I, Sunindijo RY, Kashwani G, Durdyev S, Ismail S, et al. Critical Success Factors of Safety Program Implementation in Construction Projects in Iraq. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(16). Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/16/8469
2. Agyekum K, Botchway SY, Adinyira E, Opoku A. Environmental performance indicators for assessing sustainability of projects in the Ghanaian construction industry. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment. 2022 Jan 1;11(4):918–50. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-11-2020-0161
3. Li Y, Ning Y, Chen WT. Critical Success Factors for Safety Management of High-Rise Building Construction Projects in China. Advances in Civil Engineering. 2018 Jan 1;2018(1):1516354. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1516354
4. Chai Q, Li H, Tian W, Zhang Y. Critical Success Factors for Safety Program Implementation of Regeneration of Abandoned Industrial Building Projects in China: A Fuzzy DEMATEL Approach. Sustainability. 2022;14(3). Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1550
5. Tang DKH, Leiliabadi F, Olugu EU, Md Dawal SZ binti. Factors affecting safety of processes in the Malaysian oil and gas industry. Saf Sci. 2017;92:44–52. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753516302636
6. Buniya MK, Othman I, Sunindijo RY, Kineber AF, Mussi E, Ahmad H. Barriers to safety program implementation in the construction industry. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 2021;12(1):65–72. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090447920301611
7. Redutskiy Y, Camitz-Leidland CM, Vysochyna A, Anderson KT, Balycheva M. Safety systems for the oil and gas industrial facilities: Design, maintenance policy choice, and crew scheduling. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2021;210:107545. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832021001009
8. Oil N, Association G. 070 Application of IEC 61508 and IEC 61511 in the Norwegian Petroleum Industry (Recommended SIL requirements). Norwegian Oil and Gas Association, rev. 2018;3:237.
9. Hakim IM, Singgih ML, Gunarta IK. Critical Success Factors for Internet of Things (IoT) Implementation in Automotive Companies, Indonesia. Sustainability. 2023;15(4). Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/2909
10. Hinze J. Safety plus: Making zero accidents a reality. Construction Industry Institute. 2002;160:11.
11. Hallowell MR, Gambatese JA. Construction safety risk mitigation. J Constr Eng Manag. 2009;135(12):1316–23.
12. Pinto A, Nunes IL, Ribeiro RA. Occupational risk assessment in construction industry – Overview and reflection. Saf Sci. 2011;49(5):616–24. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753511000051
13. Hallowell MR, Calhoun ME. Interrelationships among highly effective construction injury prevention strategies. J Constr Eng Manag. 2011;137(11):985–93.
14. Bavafa A, Mahdiyar A, Marsono AK. Identifying and assessing the critical factors for effective implementation of safety programs in construction projects. Saf Sci. 2018;106:47–56. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753517309827
15. Alruqi WM, Hallowell MR. Critical success factors for construction safety: Review and meta-analysis of safety leading indicators. J Constr Eng Manag. 2019;145(3):04019005.
16. Buniya MK, Othman I, Sunindijo RY, Karakhan AA, Kineber AF, Durdyev S. Contributions of safety critical success factors and safety program elements to overall project success. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics. 2023 Jan 2;29(1):129–40. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2022.2038419
17. Mohammadi A, Tavakolan M, Khosravi Y. Factors influencing safety performance on construction projects: A review. Saf Sci. 2018;109:382–97. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753516304234
18. Aka A, Awuzie B, Emuze F, Adewale Shittu A. Evaluating the effectiveness of strategies for implementation of health and safety programs on construction sites in Nigeria: A mixed-method study. J Safety Res. 2023;85:172–81. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437523000166
19. Al-Otaibi A, Kineber AF. Identifying and Assessing Health and Safety Program Implementation Barriers in the Construction Industry: A Case of Saudi Arabia. Applied Sciences. 2023;13(4). Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/4/2630
20. Ofori EK, Aram SA, Saalidong BM, Gyimah J, Niyonzima P, Mintah C, et al. Exploring new antecedent metrics for safety performance in Ghana’s oil and gas industry using partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). Resources Policy. 2023;81:103368. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420723000764
21. Waqar A, Othman I, Shafiq N, Mansoor MS. Evaluating the critical safety factors causing accidents in downstream oil and gas construction projects in Malaysia. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 2024;15(1):102300. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090447923001892
22. Kum YT, Yap JBH, Lew YL, Lee WP. Transforming construction health and safety management during COVID-19 pandemic using innovative technologies: PLS-SEM approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. 2024 Jan 1;31(7):2770–808. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2022-0780
23. Si SL, You XY, Liu HC, Zhang P. DEMATEL Technique: A Systematic Review of the State-of-the-Art Literature on Methodologies and Applications. Math Probl Eng. 2018 Jan 1;2018(1):3696457. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3696457