Psychometric Properties of the Self-Esteem Contingency Questionnaire for Adolescents

Subject Areas : روان‌شناسی تحولی

Sohrab  Amiri ¹ (PhD in Cognitive Psychology)
Amir  Ghasemi Navab ² (MA in Psychology)
Yuosef  Jamali ³ (MA in Counseling)

Received: 2017-04-03 Accepted : 2017-04-03 Published : 2016-12-21

Keywords: Reliability, factor analysis, validity, Keywords: self-esteem, ccontingency self-worth, Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale, reliability Keywords: self-esteem,

Abstract :

This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties the Self-esteem Contingency Questionnaire for Adolescents (SCQA; Wouters, & et al., 2016 ) among student population. Two hundred and eighty six students were selected by using multi-stage cluster sampling. The participants completed the SCQA, the Conditional Self-Worth Scale (Croker, & et al., 2003) and the Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (Frost, et al., 1990). The validity of the SCQA was assessed by Cronbach's alpha, test-retest and splitting methods. The criterion validity of the SCQA was assessed using the Contingencies of Self-Worth Scale and the Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale. The results indicated that the discriminant and convergent validity of the SCQA were desirable and the stability of the SCQA. The factor structure of the was assessed by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. The results of the factor analysis indicated that the Self-esteem Contingency Questionnaire for Adolescents (SCQA) had eight factors. Overall, the findings suggests that the Self-esteem Contingency Questionnaire for Adolescents has a good psychometric properties in a sample of Iranian Adolescent Students and can be used in the Iranian culture -related studies

References:

بیطرف، ش.، شعیری، م. ر. و حکیم‌جوادی، م. (1389). هراس اجتماعی، سبک‌های والدگری و کمال‌گرایی. روان‌شناسی تحولی: روان‌شناسان ایرانی، 7 (25)، 82-75.

مرزبان، ع.، کاوه فارسانی، ذ. و بهرامی، ف. (1392). بررسی روایی و اعتبار مقیاس خود‌ارزشمندی مشروط در میان دانش‌آموزان دبیرستانی شهر اصفهان. مطالعات روان‌شناختی، 9(4)، 58-31.

Bos, A. E. R., Huijding, J., Muris, P., Vogel, L. R. R., & Biesheuvel, J. (2010). Global, contingent and implicit self-esteem and psychopathological symp-toms in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 311-316.

Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.

Burwell, R. A., & Shirk, S. R. (2006). Self processes in adolescent depression: The role of self-worth contingencies. Journal of Research on Adole-scence, 16,479-490.

Crocker, J., & Luhtanen, R. (2008). Level of self-esteem and contingencies of self-worth: unique effects on academic, social, and financial problems in college students. Social and Social Psychology Bullekn, 29,701-712.

Crocker, J., Karpinski, A., Quinn, D. M., & Chase, S. (2003). When grades determine self-worth: Conse-quences of contingent self-worth for male and female engineering and psychology majors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 507-516.

Crocker, J., Luhtanen, R. K., Cooper, M. L., & Bouvrette, A. (2003). Contingencies of selfworth in college students: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85,894-908.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1995).Human autonomy: The basis for true self-esteem. In M. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 31-49). New York: Plenum.

Elisabeth, Z., Christine O. T., Wolf, B., & Matthias, B. (2014). It depends: Perfectionism as a moderator of experimentally induced Stress. Personality and Individual Differences, 63, 30-35.

Frost, R. O., Marten, P., Lahart, C., & Rosenblate. R. (1990). The dimensions of perfectionism. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14, 449-468.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Harter, S. (1988). Manual for the self-perception profile for adolescents.Denver, CO: University of Denver.

Harter, S. (1999).The construction of the self. New York: Guilford Press.

Harter, S. (2006). The Self. In W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 505–570). New Jersey: Wiley.

Heppner, W. L., & Kernis, M. H. (2011). High self-esteem: Multiple forms and their outcomes. In S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, & V. L. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research. Vol. 1. (pp.329-356). New York: Springer.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling A: Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55.

Johnson, M., & Patching, G. R. (2013). Self-esteem dynamics regulate the effects of feedback on ambition. Individual Differences Research, 11, 44-58.

Jöreskog, K. G., Sörbom, D. (2006). LISREL 8.80 for Windows [Computer Software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.

Marsh, H. W. (1992). Self Description Questionnaire (SDQ) II: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of adolescent self-concept. A test manual and research monograph. Australia: University of Western, Sydney, Faculty of Education.

Marsh, H. W., & Shavelson, R. (1985). Self-concept: Its multifaceted, hierarchical structure. Educational Psychologist, 20,107-125.

Paradise, A. W., & Kernis, M. H. (1999). Development of the Contingent Self-esteem Scale. Unpublished data, University of Georgia.

Parker, W. D., & Adkins, K. K. (1995). A psychometric examination of the Multidimensional Perectionism Scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 17, 323-334.

Rewers, M. J., Pillay, K., de Beaufort, C., Craig, M. E., Hanas, R., Acerini, C. L., & et al. (2014). ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2014. Assessment and monitoring of glycemic control in children and adolescents with diabetes. Pediatric Diabetes, 15(Suppl. 20), 102-114.

Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness of fit measures. Psychological Research, 8, 23-74.

Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46,407-441.

Susman, E. J., & Dorn, L. D. (2009). Puberty: its role in development. In R. M. Lerner, & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (3rd ed). (pp. 116- 151). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5^th ed). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Vonk, J., & Smit, H. (2012).Optimal self-esteem is contingent: Intrinsic versus extrinsic and upward versus downward contingencies. European Journal of Personality, 26, 182-193.

Wouters, S., Doumen, S., Germeijs, V., Colpin, H., & Verschueren, K. (2013). Contingencies of self-
worth in early adolescence: The antecedent role of perceived parenting. Social Development, 22, 242-258.

Wouters, S., Verschueren, K., Briers, V., & Janssen, R. (2016). Development and validation of a Self-esteem Contingency Questionnaire for Adolescents. Perso-nality and Individual Differences, 99, 295–301.