Direct and Indirect Effects of Government Expenditures on Pollution Based on Simultaneous Equations System Approach

Subject Areas : environmental management

Majid Maddah ¹ , Fatemeh Raoufi ²

1 - Associat Professor in Economic, Faculty of Economic, Management and Administrative Sciences, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran.* (Corresponding Author)
2 - MSc of Economics, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran.

Received: 2014-09-03 Accepted : 2015-09-02 Published : 2017-03-21

Keywords: Government Expenditures, Pollution, Simultaneous Equations System, Economy of Iran,

Abstract :

Background and Objective: Some market activities have negative consequences such as pollution and destruction of environment.  The market, despite its outputs, cannot product optimum quantity of goods and services and in other words it fails. In order to prevent market failure, government must intervene in the market activities through the policies of environmental protection and suitable regulation in order to reduce pollution and establish optimal conditions for production and consumption. Method: In order to investigate the effect of government expenditures on pollution, first a simultaneous equations system during 1975-2011 was specified, and after estimation of equations using two-stage least squares and three-stage least squares methods, the relationship between the direct and indirect effects of government expenditures and pollution on economy of Iran was studied. Findings: The results from estimation of equations systems specified in static and dynamic approaches devide direct and indirect effects at show that i) the size of government only has the direct effect on per capita pollution ii) there is a significant and positive relationship between the government size and per capita emissions with elasticity coefficient of 0.08 in static approach and there is a significant and negative relationship between the government size and per capita emmisions with elasticity coefficient of -0.163 in dynamic approach. Therefore, increase of the government expenditure has a negative effect on pollution and decreases it in a period of time. In addition to government size, economic openness and consumption have a significant and positive effects and total investment and population have a significant and negative effects on the per capita pollution in economy of Iran. Conclusion: The findings of this research can help in using appropriate policies such as improving public educations, proper execution of laws and regulations, strict enforcement of environmental laws and amplification of public infrastructure with the aim of environmental protection and pollution prevention.  

References:

1-      He, J., Richard, P. (2010), Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2 in Canada, Ecological Economics, 69, 1083-1093.

2-      Orubu, C. O., & Omotor, D. G. (2011), Environmental Quality and Economic Growth: Searching for Environmental Kuznets Curves for Air and Water Pollutants in Africa, Energy Policy, 39, 4178-4188.

3-      Fæhn, T., Holmøy, E. (2003), Trade Liberalization and Effects on Pollutive Emissions to Air and Deposits of Solid Waste, A General Equilibrium Assessment for Norway. Economic Modeling, 20, 703-727.

4-      Kang, S. I., Kim, J. J. (2012), A Quantitative Analysis of the Environmental Impact  Induced by Free Trade between Korea and Japan, 7th Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, Trade Poverty and the Environment, Washington. D.C.  United States.

5-      Cole, M.A., Elliot, R. J. R. (2003), Determining the Trade-Environment Composition Effect: the Role of Capital, Labor and Environmental Regulations, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46, 363–383.

6-      Adkins, L., Garbaccio, R. (2007), Coordinating Global Trade and Environmental Policy: The Role of Pre-Existing Distortions. National Center for Environ. Economics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C., United States.

7-      Managi, S., Hibiki, A., Tsurumi, T. (2009), Does Trade Openness Improve Environmental Quality? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 58, 346–363.

8-      Narayan, P.K., Smyth, R., Prasad, A. (2007), Electricity Consumption in G7 Countries: a Panel Cointegrating Analysis of Residential Demand Elasticities, Energy Policy, 35, 4485–4494.

9-      Baek, J., Cho, Y., Koo, W.W. (2009), the Environmental Consequences of Globalization: a Country-Specific Time-Series Analysis. Ecological Economics, 68, 2255–2264.

10-  Frederik, C., Lundstrom, S. (2001), Political and Economic Freedom and the Environment: the Case of CO2 Emission. Working Paper in Economics no. 29. University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg.

11-  Lopez, R., Galinato, G.I., Islam, A.  (2011), Fiscal Spending and the Environment: Theory and Empirics, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 62,180-198.

12-  Islam, A.M., Lopez, R.E. (2013) Government Spending and Air Pollution in the US, Working Paper, the University of Maryland, College Park.

13-  Halkos, G. E., Paizanos, E. A. (2013) the Effect of Government   Expenditure on the Environment: An Empirical Investigation, Ecological Economics 91, 48–56. 

14- برقی اسکویی. محمد مهدی،1387، آثار آزادسازی تجاری بر انتشار گازهای گلخانه ای (دی اکسید کربن) در منحنی زیست محیطی کوزنتس،تحقیقات اقتصادی، 82،صص 21-1.

15- نصراللهی. زهرا و غفاری گولک. مرضیه، 1388، توسعه اقتصادی و آلودگی محیط زیست در کشورهای عضو پیمان کیوتو و کشورهای آسیای جنوب غربی (با تأکید بر منحنی زیست محیطی کوزنتس)، پژوهش نامه علوم اقتصادی، 35،صص 126-105.                          

16- مدّاح. مجید و عبداالهی. مریم، 1391، اثر کیفیت نهادها بر آلودگی محیط زیست در چارچوب منحنی کوزنتس با استفاده از الگوهای پانل دیتا ایستا و پویا ( مطالعه موردی: کشورهای عضو سازمان کنفرانس اسلامی)، فصل­نامه اقتصاد محیط زیست و انرژی،صص 186-171.

17- مراد حاصل. نیلوفر و مزینی. امیر حسین، 1387، ارزیابی نقش دولت در چالش­های زیست محیطی ایران (رویکرد اقتصاد محیط زیست)، علوم و تکنولوژی محیط زیست، دوره 10، شماره 4، صص 23-11.                           

18- آماده. حمید ، شاکری. عباس و محمدیان. فرشته ،1391،  بررسی رابطه بین اندازه دولت و کیفیت محیط زیست ، فصل­نامه مطالعات اقتصادی کاربردی در ایران، 2، صص60-27.                      

19-  Lawn, P.A. (2003), Environmental Macroeconomics: Extending the IS-LM Model to Include an ‘Environmental Equilibrium’ Curve, Australian Economic Papers 42 (1), 118–134.

20-  Managi, S., Hibiki, A., Tsurumi, T. (2009), Does Trade Openness Improve Environmental Quality? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 58, 346–363.

21-  Pindych, R.S., Rubinfeld, D. L. (1998), a Computer Handbook Using Eviews, Fourth Edition, McGraw-Hill.

22-  Čadil, j., Petkovová, L., Blatná, D. (2014), Human Capital, Economic Structure and Growth, Procedia Economics and Finance, 12, 85-92.