• Home
  • Determining the Causal Relationships between the Create Triggers and the Application of Industrial Symbiosis in Industrial Towns by Using Fuzzy DEMATEL Method

Share To

Article Url


Manuscript ID : JEST-1905-4696 (R1) Visit : 62 Page: 47 - 60

10.30495/jest.2023.44803.4696

Article Type: Original Research

Determining the Causal Relationships between the Create Triggers and the Application of Industrial Symbiosis in Industrial Towns by Using Fuzzy DEMATEL Method

Subject Areas : environmental management

ebrahim  Sepehri Shafigh 1 (Phd student, Department of Management, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran.)
Houshang  Taghizadeh 2 (Professor of Management, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran. *(Corresponding Author))
soleyman  iranzadeh 3 (Professor of Management, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran.)

Received: 2020-05-12 Accepted : 2020-10-29 Published : 2022-07-23

Keywords: Industrial symbiosis, Fuzzy DEMATEL, Industrial towns,

Abstract :

Background and Objective: Regarding the fact that industrial symbiosis networks can both help the state's environment and contribute to sustainable development through considering economic and social issues. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to determine the causal relationships between the create triggers and the application of industrial symbiosis in two industrial towns of Tabriz.Material and Methodology: The method of research is descriptive and based on the purpose of the research, it is an applied one. The statistical sample of the study includes 256 active companies in Shahid Salimi and Shahid Rajaee industrial towns. Two questionnaires were used to collect data. The first one was designed to identify the create triggers and the application of industrial symbiosis; moreover, the second one was developed to determine the causal relationships between the triggers. Research questionnaires were given to the managers of the sample companies. A single-sample t-test and a fuzzy DEMATEL method were used to analyze data.    Findings: Research results show that top management support and information sharing among participants are the most influential factors; besides institutional support and awareness of the concepts are considered as the factors of the most influential factors.  Discussion and Conclusion: According to the research findings, it can be concluded that in order to create industrial coexistence in the industrial towns of the country, the first steps should be to increase the supportive management and information sharing among the industrial partners.

References:


  1. Frosch RA, Gallopoulos NE. Strategies for manufacturing. Scientific American. 1989 Sep 1; 261(3):144-52.
    2.
  2. Chertow MR. Industrial symbiosis: literature and taxonomy. Annual review of energy and the environment. 2000 Nov; 25(1):313-37.
    3.
  3. Li X, Xiao R. Analyzing network topological characteristics of eco-industrial parks from the perspective of resilience: a case study. Ecological indicators. 2017 Mar 1; 74:403-13.
    4.
  4. Herczeg G, Akkerman R, Hauschild MZ. Supply chain collaboration in industrial symbiosis networks. Journal of cleaner production. 2018 Jan 10; 171:1058-67.
    5.
  5. Chertow MR, Lombardi DR. Quantifying economic and environmental benefits of co-located firms. Environmental Science and Technology, 2005; 39 (17),6535-6541.
    6.
  6. Jacobsen NB. Industrial symbiosis in Kalundborg, Denmark: a quantitative assessment of economic and environmental aspects. Journal of industrial ecology. 2006 Jan;10(1‐2):239-55.
    7.
  7. Van Beers D, Bossilkov A, Corder G, Van Berkel R. Industrial symbiosis in the Australian minerals industry: the cases of Kwinana and Gladstone. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 2007 Jan;11(1):55-72.
    8.
  8. Venta GJ, Nisbet MA. Opportunities for Industrial Ecological Parks in Canada: Case Study, Sarnia-Lambton Industrial Complex. Venta, Glaser & Associates; 1997 Mar 1.
    9.
  9. Korhonen J, Wihersaari M. Industrial Ecology of a Regional Energy Supply System. Greener Management International. 1999 Jun 1(26).
    10.
  10. Patel R, Modi B, Patwari S, Gopichandran R, Wilderer M. Aspects of Eco Industrial Networking exercise at the Naroda Industrial Estate. InProceedings of International Conference on Industrial Park Management: New Strategies for Industrial Development. April 2001 Apr 3 (pp. 3-6).
    11.
  11. Behera SK, Kim JH, Lee SY, Suh S, Park HS. Evolution of ‘designed’industrial symbiosis networks in the Ulsan Eco-Industrial Park: ‘research and development into business’ as the enabling framework. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2012 Jul 1; 29:103-12.
    12.
  12. Zhu Q, Lowe EA, Wei YA, Barnes D. Industrial symbiosis in China: a case study of the Guitang Group. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 2007 Jan;11(1):31-42.
    13.
  13. Ayres RU. Industrial metabolism. Technology and environment. 1989 Feb 1; 1989:23-49.
    14.
  14. Connelly L, Koshland CP. Exergy and industrial ecology—Part 1: An exergy-based definition of consumption and a thermodynamic interpretation of ecosystem evolution. Exergy, an international journal. 2001 Jan 1;1(3):146-65.
    15.
  15. Lal, B. Building the future we want: trends and technologies (Second edition). Teri Press. 2005.
    16.
  16. Erkman S. Industrial ecology: an historical view. Journal of cleaner production. 1997 Jan 1;5(1-2):1-0.
    17.
  17. Desrochers P. Industrial ecology and the rediscovery of inter‐firm recycling linkages: historical evidence and policy implications. Industrial and Corporate Change. 2002 Nov 1;11(5):1031-57.
    18.
  18. Frosch RA. Industrial ecology: a philosophical introduction. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences. 1992 Feb 1;89(3):800-3.
    19.
  19. Benyus, J. M. Biomimicry: William Morrow New York. 1997 Sep.
    20.
  20. Milani, A. & Schlüter, L. An Ecosystem Analysis of Industrial Symbiosis Development in Aalborg, Denmark, Master thesis, Aalborg University. 2018 June.
    21.
  21. Chertow MR. “Uncovering” industrial symbiosis. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 2007 Jan;11(1):11-30.
    22.
  22. Machiba T, Doranova A, Joller L, Leon LR, Miedzinski M, van der Veen G. The future of eco-innovation: the role of business models in green transformation. InJoint workshop, OECD Background Paper, Copenhagen, Denmark 2012 Jan.
    23.
  23. Vanhaverbeke W, Gilsing V, Beerkens B, Duysters G. The role of alliance network redundancy in the creation of core and non‐core technologies. Journal of management studies. 2009 Mar; 46(2):215-44.
    24.
  24. Gibbs D, Deutz P. Reflections on implementing industrial ecology through eco-industrial park development. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2007 Nov 1;15(17):1683-95.
    25.
  25. Chertow M, Ehrenfeld J. Organizing self‐organizing systems: Toward a theory of industrial symbiosis. Journal of industrial ecology. 2012 Feb;16(1):13-27.
    26.
  26. Walls JL, Paquin RL. Organizational perspectives of industrial symbiosis: A review and synthesis. Organization & Environment. 2015 Mar;28(1):32-53.
    27.
  27. Levänen JO, Hukkinen JI. A methodology for facilitating the feedback between mental models and institutional change in industrial ecosystem governance: A waste management case-study from northern Finland. Ecological economics. 2013 Mar 1; 87:15-23.
    28.
  28. Chiu AS, Yong G. On the industrial ecology potential in Asian developing countries. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2004 Oct 1;12(8-10):1037-45.
    29.
  29. Li J, Pan SY, Kim H, Linn JH, Chiang PC. Building green supply chains in eco-industrial parks towards a green economy: Barriers and strategies. Journal of environmental management. 2015 Oct 1; 162:158-70.
    30.
  30. Boons F, Spekkink W, Mouzakitis Y. The dynamics of industrial symbiosis: a proposal for a conceptual framework based upon a comprehensive literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2011 Jun 1;19(9-10):905-11.
    31.
  31. Costa I, Ferrão P. A case study of industrial symbiosis development using a middle-out approach. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2010 Jul 1;18(10-11):984-92.
    32.
  32. Ashton WS. Managing performance expectations of industrial symbiosis. Business strategy and the environment. 2011 Jul;20(5):297-309.
    33.
  33. Park HS, Rene ER, Choi SM, Chiu AS. Strategies for sustainable development of industrial park in Ulsan, South Korea—From spontaneous evolution to systematic expansion of industrial symbiosis. Journal of environmental management. 2008 Apr 1;87(1):1-3.
    34.
  34. Wu WW, Lee YT. Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert systems with applications. 2007 Feb 1;32(2):499-507.
    35.
  35. Uzunovic E, Canizares CA, Huang Z, Ni Y, Shen CM, Wu FF, Chen S, Zhang B. Discussion of" Application of unified power flow controller in interconnected power systems-modeling, interface, control strategy, and case study"[and reply]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 2000 Nov;15(4):1461-2.
    36.
  36. Chou YC, Sun CC, Yen HY. Evaluating the criteria for human resource for science and technology (HRST)based on integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy DEMATEL approach. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 2012; 12, 64–71.
    37.
  37. Ahmadi R, Jafarzadeh Afshari A. Using DEMATEL Technique to Investigate the Causal and Effective Relationships of Factors Affecting Green Supply Chain Performance in Sepahan Battery Industrial Complex, 2nd International Conference on Industrial Management and Engineering. 2016 Mar 2. (In Persian)
    38.
  38. Jafarnejad A, Ahmadi A, Malaki Mh. Evaluating of Leanness by Using a Combined Fuzzy ANP and DEMATEL Approach. 2011 Feb; 8(20): 1-25. (In Persian)
    39.
  39. Aghaee M, Fazli S. applying a hybrid dema tel and anp approach for suitable maintenance approach selection (case study: work vehicle industry). 2012 Aug; 2(2): 89-107. (In Persian)
    40.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

_||_

  1. Frosch RA, Gallopoulos NE. Strategies for manufacturing. Scientific American. 1989 Sep 1; 261(3):144-52.
    2.
  2. Chertow MR. Industrial symbiosis: literature and taxonomy. Annual review of energy and the environment. 2000 Nov; 25(1):313-37.
    3.
  3. Li X, Xiao R. Analyzing network topological characteristics of eco-industrial parks from the perspective of resilience: a case study. Ecological indicators. 2017 Mar 1; 74:403-13.
    4.
  4. Herczeg G, Akkerman R, Hauschild MZ. Supply chain collaboration in industrial symbiosis networks. Journal of cleaner production. 2018 Jan 10; 171:1058-67.
    5.
  5. Chertow MR, Lombardi DR. Quantifying economic and environmental benefits of co-located firms. Environmental Science and Technology, 2005; 39 (17),6535-6541.
    6.
  6. Jacobsen NB. Industrial symbiosis in Kalundborg, Denmark: a quantitative assessment of economic and environmental aspects. Journal of industrial ecology. 2006 Jan;10(1‐2):239-55.
    7.
  7. Van Beers D, Bossilkov A, Corder G, Van Berkel R. Industrial symbiosis in the Australian minerals industry: the cases of Kwinana and Gladstone. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 2007 Jan;11(1):55-72.
    8.
  8. Venta GJ, Nisbet MA. Opportunities for Industrial Ecological Parks in Canada: Case Study, Sarnia-Lambton Industrial Complex. Venta, Glaser & Associates; 1997 Mar 1.
    9.
  9. Korhonen J, Wihersaari M. Industrial Ecology of a Regional Energy Supply System. Greener Management International. 1999 Jun 1(26).
    10.
  10. Patel R, Modi B, Patwari S, Gopichandran R, Wilderer M. Aspects of Eco Industrial Networking exercise at the Naroda Industrial Estate. InProceedings of International Conference on Industrial Park Management: New Strategies for Industrial Development. April 2001 Apr 3 (pp. 3-6).
    11.
  11. Behera SK, Kim JH, Lee SY, Suh S, Park HS. Evolution of ‘designed’industrial symbiosis networks in the Ulsan Eco-Industrial Park: ‘research and development into business’ as the enabling framework. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2012 Jul 1; 29:103-12.
    12.
  12. Zhu Q, Lowe EA, Wei YA, Barnes D. Industrial symbiosis in China: a case study of the Guitang Group. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 2007 Jan;11(1):31-42.
    13.
  13. Ayres RU. Industrial metabolism. Technology and environment. 1989 Feb 1; 1989:23-49.
    14.
  14. Connelly L, Koshland CP. Exergy and industrial ecology—Part 1: An exergy-based definition of consumption and a thermodynamic interpretation of ecosystem evolution. Exergy, an international journal. 2001 Jan 1;1(3):146-65.
    15.
  15. Lal, B. Building the future we want: trends and technologies (Second edition). Teri Press. 2005.
    16.
  16. Erkman S. Industrial ecology: an historical view. Journal of cleaner production. 1997 Jan 1;5(1-2):1-0.
    17.
  17. Desrochers P. Industrial ecology and the rediscovery of inter‐firm recycling linkages: historical evidence and policy implications. Industrial and Corporate Change. 2002 Nov 1;11(5):1031-57.
    18.
  18. Frosch RA. Industrial ecology: a philosophical introduction. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences. 1992 Feb 1;89(3):800-3.
    19.
  19. Benyus, J. M. Biomimicry: William Morrow New York. 1997 Sep.
    20.
  20. Milani, A. & Schlüter, L. An Ecosystem Analysis of Industrial Symbiosis Development in Aalborg, Denmark, Master thesis, Aalborg University. 2018 June.
    21.
  21. Chertow MR. “Uncovering” industrial symbiosis. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 2007 Jan;11(1):11-30.
    22.
  22. Machiba T, Doranova A, Joller L, Leon LR, Miedzinski M, van der Veen G. The future of eco-innovation: the role of business models in green transformation. InJoint workshop, OECD Background Paper, Copenhagen, Denmark 2012 Jan.
    23.
  23. Vanhaverbeke W, Gilsing V, Beerkens B, Duysters G. The role of alliance network redundancy in the creation of core and non‐core technologies. Journal of management studies. 2009 Mar; 46(2):215-44.
    24.
  24. Gibbs D, Deutz P. Reflections on implementing industrial ecology through eco-industrial park development. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2007 Nov 1;15(17):1683-95.
    25.
  25. Chertow M, Ehrenfeld J. Organizing self‐organizing systems: Toward a theory of industrial symbiosis. Journal of industrial ecology. 2012 Feb;16(1):13-27.
    26.
  26. Walls JL, Paquin RL. Organizational perspectives of industrial symbiosis: A review and synthesis. Organization & Environment. 2015 Mar;28(1):32-53.
    27.
  27. Levänen JO, Hukkinen JI. A methodology for facilitating the feedback between mental models and institutional change in industrial ecosystem governance: A waste management case-study from northern Finland. Ecological economics. 2013 Mar 1; 87:15-23.
    28.
  28. Chiu AS, Yong G. On the industrial ecology potential in Asian developing countries. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2004 Oct 1;12(8-10):1037-45.
    29.
  29. Li J, Pan SY, Kim H, Linn JH, Chiang PC. Building green supply chains in eco-industrial parks towards a green economy: Barriers and strategies. Journal of environmental management. 2015 Oct 1; 162:158-70.
    30.
  30. Boons F, Spekkink W, Mouzakitis Y. The dynamics of industrial symbiosis: a proposal for a conceptual framework based upon a comprehensive literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2011 Jun 1;19(9-10):905-11.
    31.
  31. Costa I, Ferrão P. A case study of industrial symbiosis development using a middle-out approach. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2010 Jul 1;18(10-11):984-92.
    32.
  32. Ashton WS. Managing performance expectations of industrial symbiosis. Business strategy and the environment. 2011 Jul;20(5):297-309.
    33.
  33. Park HS, Rene ER, Choi SM, Chiu AS. Strategies for sustainable development of industrial park in Ulsan, South Korea—From spontaneous evolution to systematic expansion of industrial symbiosis. Journal of environmental management. 2008 Apr 1;87(1):1-3.
    34.
  34. Wu WW, Lee YT. Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert systems with applications. 2007 Feb 1;32(2):499-507.
    35.
  35. Uzunovic E, Canizares CA, Huang Z, Ni Y, Shen CM, Wu FF, Chen S, Zhang B. Discussion of" Application of unified power flow controller in interconnected power systems-modeling, interface, control strategy, and case study"[and reply]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 2000 Nov;15(4):1461-2.
    36.
  36. Chou YC, Sun CC, Yen HY. Evaluating the criteria for human resource for science and technology (HRST)based on integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy DEMATEL approach. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 2012; 12, 64–71.
    37.
  37. Ahmadi R, Jafarzadeh Afshari A. Using DEMATEL Technique to Investigate the Causal and Effective Relationships of Factors Affecting Green Supply Chain Performance in Sepahan Battery Industrial Complex, 2nd International Conference on Industrial Management and Engineering. 2016 Mar 2. (In Persian)
    38.
  38. Jafarnejad A, Ahmadi A, Malaki Mh. Evaluating of Leanness by Using a Combined Fuzzy ANP and DEMATEL Approach. 2011 Feb; 8(20): 1-25. (In Persian)
    39.
  39. Aghaee M, Fazli S. applying a hybrid dema tel and anp approach for suitable maintenance approach selection (case study: work vehicle industry). 2012 Aug; 2(2): 89-107. (In Persian)
    40.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Related articles

The rights to this website are owned by the Raimag Press Management System.
Copyright © 2021-2024

Home| Login| About Us| Contact Us|
[فارسی] [العربية] [fa] [ar]