Spatial distribution of desertification hazard in Sabzevar using IMDPA model

Subject Areas : natural resorces

Esmaeil Silakhori ¹ , majid ownegh ² , amir sadoddin ³

1 - PhD, Combating Desertification, Faculty of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran. * (Corresponding Author)
2 - Professors, Geomorphology, Faculty of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran.
3 - Associate Professors, Watershed Resources Management, Faculty of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran.

Received: 2017-02-03 Accepted : 2017-05-24 Published : 2019-06-22

Keywords: IMDPA model, Geomorphologic facies, Sabzevar, Desertification hazard intensity,

Abstract :

Background and Objective: Desertification is a global issue with serious implications worldwide on biodiversity, eco-safety, poverty eradication, socio-economic stability, and sustainable development. The most efficient methods for assessing desertification intensity are experimental methods. The aim of this study was to assess desertification hazard in Sabzevar using the GIS and IMDPA model. Method: The IMDPA model was applied to evaluate the desertification intensity in Sabzevar. For this purpose, first the land unit map (geomorphologic facies) was created using slope, geology, vegetation cover, land use, Landsat 5 and Google Earth satellite images in 4 units, and 10 types and 96 facies were identified. Then, in each work unit, all the criteria were valued based on the selected indices which resulted in the qualitative mapping of each criterion based on the geometric mean of the indices. The mapping of each group was done based on the geometric mean of the studied criterion. Then, the desertification intensity map of the region was obtained using a geometric average of all groups. Findings: The results showed that water, irrigation, and erosion have the most severe impact on desertification with weighted means of 2.94 and 2.72, respectively. Sabzevar was divided into two classes of moderate (II) and intensive (IV) classes, with the largest area covered by the moderate class (85.07 %) Discussion and Conclusion: Sabzevar has a diverse variety of geomorphologic terrains from high mountains to Playa, and dividing it into two classes indicates the simplicity of the IMPDA in preparing desertification. The reason for this peculiarity is the diverse features, geometric mean and unbalanced classification. The mentioned hazard map along with key factors in desertification can be used by the related managers for combating desertification and moving towards sustainable development in Sabzevar.

References:

1. Goudie, A.S., (2011) Desertification. Encyclopedia of Environmental Hhealth: 30-35.


2. Biroudian, Nader. 2001. Principles of Desert Resources Management. Rashad Publication. 205 pp. (In Persian)


3. Dawelbait, M. and Morari, F., (2012) Monitoring desertification in a Savannah region in Sudan using Landsat images and spectral mixture analysis, Journal of Arid Environments, 80: 45-55.


4. UNCCD, (1994) Status of Ratification and Entry into Force. United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification Paris.


5. Zhu, Z.D., Chen, G.T., (1994) Sandy Desertification in China. Science Press, Beijing.


6. Zhao, H.L., 2012. Desert Ecology. China Science Press, Beijing.


7. Zhao, H.L., Li, J., Liu, R., Zhou, R., Qu, H., Pan, Ch., (2014) Effects of desertification on temporal and spatial distribution of soil macro-arthropods in Horqin sandy grassland, Inner Mongolia, Geoderma 223–225: 62–67.


8. UNCCD Brochure., (2012) Desertification land degredation and drought (DLDD) – some global facts and figures, http://www.un.org/.


9. Ekhtessassi, M.R., and Sepehr. A., (2011) Methods and models of desertification assessment and mapping. Yazd University Press, 286p. (In Persian)


10. Feiznia, S., Gooya, A.N., Ahmadi, H., and Azarnivand, H., (2001) Investigation on Desertification Factors in Hossein-Abad Mish Mast Plain and a Proposal for a Regional Model, Biaban, 6 (2): 1-6. (In Persian)


11. Hoseini, S.M., Ekhtesasi, M.R., Shahriyari, A.R., and Shafiei, H., (2010) Study of current and potential desertification status with emphasis on wind erosion criterion using MICD method (Case Study: Niatak Region of Sistan). Journal of Range and Watershed Management. Iranian journal of natural Resources. 63:2. 165-181. (In Persian)


12. Tabatabaie-Zadeh, M., (2010) The comparison of desertification intensity potential using MICD and IMDPA methods with emphasis on wind erosion (Case Study: Fakhr-Abad of Mehriz). A thesis of MSc in University of Tehran, 92p. (In Persian)


13. Abrisham, E., (2004) Assessment and mapping of desertification using FAO-UNEP, ICD and MICD models in Fakhrabad-Mehriz (Yazd), A thesis of MSc in combating desertification, University of Tehran, 130p. (In Persian)


14. Rezaee Rad, N., (2009) The Study of desertification potential Cheshme Khan Basin by IMDPA method. A thesis of MSc in combating desertification, University of Tehran, 110p. (In Persian)


15. Niko, S.H., (2011) Assessment of potential desertification, land degradation to identify the effective factors by using IMDPA method (Case study: Damghan region). A thesis of PhD in combating desertification, University of Tehran, 233p. (In Persian)


16. Zolfaghari, F., Shahriari, A, R., Fakhireh, A., Rashki, A.R., Noori, S., and Khosravi, H., (2011) Assessment of desertification potential using IMDPA model in Sistan plain. Watershed Management Research (Pajouhesh and Sazandegi). 91: 97-107. (In Persian)


17. Silakhori, E., (2014) Mapping of desertification hazard intensity based on soil index using ESAs methodology in Mazinan of Sabzevar, Emergency Management, 57 (6): 57-63. (In Persian)


18. Hashemi, Z., Pahlevanravi, A., and Miri, A., (2011) Evaluating the present situation of desertification in Zahak region of Sistan based on water erosion criteria. Watershed Management Research (Pajouhesh & Sazandegi). 91: 68-79. (In Persian)

1. Vali, A.A., Mousavi, S.H., SadatAhmadi, S.M, (2015), Assessment of Desertification Intensity in Masjed Soleiman Basin Using IMDPA Model, Desert Ecosystem Engineering Journal, 4 (9): 43-56. (In Persian)

20. Parvari, S.H., Pahlavanravi, A., Moghaddam Nia, A.R., Dehvari, A., and Parvari, D., (2011) Application of Methodology for Mapping Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) to Desertification in Dry Bed of Hamoun Wetland (Iran), International Journal of Natural Resources and Marine Sciences, 1 (1): 65-80.


21. Elena Topa, M., Iavazzo, P., Terracciano, S., Adamo, P., Coly, A., De Paola, F., Giardano, S., Giugni, M., and Eric Traore, S., (2013) Evaluation of sensitivity to desertification by a modified ESAs method in two sub-Saharan peri-urban areas: Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso) and Saint Louis (Senegal), Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 15.


22. Silakhori, E., (2013) Assessing desertification hazard (comparing MICD and IMDPA models), risk and developing management plan in Sabzevar region, Iran, a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of M.Sc. in Natural Resources – Arid Zone Management, Collage of Range and Watershed Management, Gorgan University of Agricultural Scienses and Natural Resources, 172 p. (In Persian)


23. Zehtabian, Gh., Khosravi, H., and Masoudi, R., (2016) Models of Desertification Assessment (Criteria and Indices), University of Tehran Press, 268 p. (In Persian)