Investigating the role of the fundamental transformation document on educational management and the development of religious education in schools: A meta-synthesis study
Reza AsghariKhaftari
1
(
Fourth year PhD student in curriculum planning at Shiraz University
)
Sajjad Nikkhoo
2
(
faculty member of the Department of Theology and Islamic Studies, Farhangian University,
)
Keywords: Fundamental transformation document, educational management, development of religious knowledge, metasynthesis, transformational management, educational system.,
Abstract :
Abstract
Introduction and Objective: The Fundamental Transformation Document of Education, as the main roadmap of the country's education system, plays a pivotal role in guiding and guiding educational changes. This study aims to investigate and analyze the role of the Fundamental Transformation Document in educational management and the development of religious education in schools. The necessity of this study arises from the fact that a deep understanding of the mutual effects of the transformation document, educational management, and the development of religious education can help improve the implementation processes and achieve the lofty goals of the educational system.
Methodology: This study was conducted with a qualitative approach and meta-synthesis method. The statistical population includes all scientific research articles, books, and documents related to the subject between 1390 and 1402. Valid domestic and foreign scientific databases were used to collect data, and data analysis was performed using the content analysis method. Inclusion criteria included relevance to the research topic, scientific validity of the sources, and novelty of the studies.
Findings: Content analysis of the sources led to the identification of four main overarching themes: structural transformation in the education system, transformational and participatory management, development of religious knowledge, innovation and organizational change. Each of these overarching themes has several organizing and basic themes that are meaningfully related to each other in the form of a network of themes. The findings show that success in implementing the fundamental transformation document requires simultaneous attention to the managerial and educational dimensions.
Discussion and Conclusion: The results of the research show that the fundamental transformation document plays a key role in guiding the education system towards excellence. Success in implementing this document requires: strengthening participatory and transformational management, paying special attention to the development of religious knowledge, creating coordination between the various elements of the education system, paying attention to contemporary challenges and environmental changes. It is suggested that for the successful implementation of the transformation document, the training programs of managers be reviewed and the necessary mechanisms be provided to strengthen the participation of stakeholders.
1. Ahmadi, H., et al. (2022). “Content Analysis of the Fundamental Reform Document of Education”. Curriculum Studies Quarterly, 16(2), 45-68.
2. Ahmadi, M. (2021). “Content Analysis of the Fundamental Reform Document of Education”. Curriculum Studies Quarterly, 15(2), 45-62.
3. Alavi, H., et al. (2023). “Comprehensive Analysis of Religious Education Status in Schools”. Journal of Islamic Studies, 14(1), 45-62.
4. Alavi, S. H., et al. (2023). “Analysis of Religious Education Components in the Fundamental Reform Document”. Bi-Quarterly Journal of Islamic Education, 17(2), 23-44.
5. Alavi, S. H., et al. (2023). “The Impact of Leadership Skills Training on School Principals’ Performance”. Bi-Quarterly Journal of School Management, 11(1), 78-99.
6. Anderson, M., & Thompson, K. (2022). Innovation in Educational Management. Journal of Educational Change, 23(1), 78-99.
7. Bagheri, K. (2019). “An Introduction to Philosophy of Education in Islamic Republic of Iran”. Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications.
8. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Brown, S., et al. (2023). Implementation Challenges in Educational Reform. Paper presented at the International Conference on Educational Management, London, UK.
10. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
11. Fowler, J. W. (1981). Stages of faith: The psychology of human development and the quest for meaning. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
12. Fullan, M. (2020). Leading in a culture of change (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13. Fundamental Reform Document of Education. (2011). Supreme Council of Cultural Revolution.
14. Hajibabaei, H. (2020). “Theoretical Foundations of Fundamental Reform in General Formal Education System”. Tehran: Madreseh Publications.
15. Harris, A. (2023). Educational Leadership in Practice. London: Routledge.
16. Harris, A., & Muijs, D. (2005). Improving Schools Through Teacher Leadership. Open University Press.
17. Hosseini, M., et al. (2022). “Content Analysis of Fundamental Reform Document and Its Implementation Challenges”. Educational Planning Studies Quarterly, 12(3), 45-67.
18. Hosseini, S. (2020). “Implementation Challenges of Fundamental Reform Document in Schools”. Educational Management Research, 11(3), 78-95.
19. Hosseini, S., & Mohammadi, R. (2022). “Evaluating the Effectiveness of Religious Education Programs”. Educational Studies Quarterly, 15(3), 78-95.
20. Hosseini, S. M. (2023). “Designing Transformational Leadership Model in Schools”. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Tehran.
21. Hosseini, S. M., & Rezaei, A. (2023). “Examining Implementation Challenges of Fundamental Reform Document in Schools”. Foundations of Education Research Journal, 13(1), 89-112.
22. Jafari, Z. (2022). “Investigating Barriers to Implementing Fundamental Reform Document in Tehran High Schools”. Doctoral Dissertation, Tarbiat Modares University.
23. Johnson, B., & Brown, T. (2022). Educational transformation in Islamic contexts. International Journal of Educational Research, 112, 101924.
24. Karimi, A., & Mahmoudi, M. (2022). “Critical Analysis of Educational Management Theories in Iran”. Bi-Quarterly Journal of School Management, 10(2), 145-168.
25. Karimi, A., & Sadeghi, M. (2022). “Participatory Management Model in Transformed Schools”. Educational Innovations Quarterly, 20(4), 123-144.
26. Karimi, A., & Sadeghi, M. (2022). “Role of Management in Achieving Reform Document Goals”. Educational Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 89-106.
27. Khan, M. A. (2016). The Role of Islamic Education in the Development of Moral Values in Students. International Journal of Educational Research and Development, 5(1), 1-10.
28. Lee, K., & Chen, W. (2022). Leadership Development in Schools. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 45-67.
29. Mahmoudi, R., & Razavi, S. A. (2023). “Content Analysis of Religious Education Programs in Schools”. Islamic Education Quarterly, 18(2), 34-56.
30. Ministry of Education Research and Planning Organization. (2016). Executive Guide to Fundamental Reform Document.
31. Ministry of Education. (2011). Fundamental Reform Document of Education.
32. Mohammadi, R. (2019). “Evaluating Managers’ Performance in Implementing Fundamental Reform Document”. School Management Journal, 7(4), 23-40.
33. Mohammadi, R., et al. (2023). “Educational System Transformations in Digital Age”. Educational Innovations Journal, 17(2), 134-152.
34. Mohammadi, R., et al. (2023). “Systematic Review of Fundamental Reform Document Studies: A Meta-analysis”. Education Quarterly, 39(1), 67-92.
35. Motahari, M. (2010). “Education in Islam”. Tehran: Sadra Publications.
36. Peterson, K. D. (2022). School Culture and Educational Change. New York: Teachers College Press.
37. Razavi, S. M., & Salehi, A. (2022). “Explaining Educational System Transformation Management Model”. Educational Innovations Quarterly, 21(3), 156-178.
38. Rezaei, A. (2022). “Educational Leadership in Age of Transformation”. Tehran: Madreseh Publications.
39. Rezaei, A., & Mohammadi, H. (2023). “Role of School Management in Achieving Reform Document Goals”. Educational Management Research, 15(2), 89-110.
40. Rezaei, E. (2022). “Examining Role of Reform Document in Religious Education Development”. Islamic Education Quarterly, 13(1), 112-130.
41. Rezaei, M. (2022). “Designing Implementation Model of Fundamental Reform Document in Secondary Schools”. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Tehran.
42. Rezaei, M., et al. (2023). “Implementation Challenges of Fundamental Reform Document”. Educational Management Research, 16(2), 112-130.
43. Roberts, J., & Wilson, M. (2023). A Systematic Review of Educational Transformation. Review of Educational Research, 93(2), 189-220.
44. Sadeghi, Z. (2023). “Analysis of Managers’ Role in Implementing Fundamental Reform Document”. Master’s Thesis, Tarbiat Modares University.
45. Salimi, M. (2021). “Transformation Management in Educational System”. Tehran: SAMT Publications.
46. Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2007). “Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research”. Translation by Ali Delavar (2020). Tehran: Virayesh Publications.
47. Schein, E. H. (2017). Organizational culture and leadership (5th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
48. Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Currency/Doubleday.
49. Shabani, H. (2021). “Educational Skills: Teaching Methods and Techniques”. Tehran: SAMT Publications.
50. Smith, J. R., & Williams, K. (2023). Leadership approaches in educational change. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 51(2), 289-305.
51. Theoretical Foundations of Fundamental Reform in General Formal Education System of Islamic Republic of Iran. (2011). Ministry of Education.
52. Thompson, L. (2022). Meta-analysis of School Leadership Studies. Educational Research Review, 35, 100411.
53. Williams, R., et al. (2023). Change Management in Educational Systems. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 51(2), 234-256.