Investigating the role of mediator of organizational justice and quality of work life in modeling the effect of spiritual intelligence on self-efficacy;Examining the views of teachers
Subject Areas : Educational management
jafar beikzad
1
(Governmental Administration, Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Bonab, Iran)
ali hedayat fasandoz
2
(Ph.D. student / lecturer at Islamic Azad University)
Keywords: quality of work life, Spiritual Intelligence, Organizational Justice, Structural equations, Teacher Self-Efficacy,
Abstract :
The purpose of this study is to explain the effect of spiritual intelligence on teacher self-efficacy through the mediator of organizational justice and quality of work life. The population consisted of high school teachers in Naghadeh city, which were selected by random sampling method, 230 subjects. The descriptive - correlation research method is applied using structural equation model as an applied research. Data were collected by David King's standard intelligence questionnaire, Sherer's general self-efficacy, Walton's quality of work life, and organizational justice, Nijouff and Morell. In order to test the fitting goodness, structural equation modeling with partial least squares approach was performed. The results of the analysis showed that spiritual intelligence has a positive and significant effect on the teachers' self-efficacy, quality of work life, and organizational justice. Spiritual intelligence explains directly the quality of work life and organizational justice (0.26, 0.63, and 0.59) of teacher self-efficacy changes, respectively. And indirectly by mediating organizational justice and quality of work life, respectively, are 0.26 and 0.18, respectively, affecting self-efficacy. Organizational justice also explains 0.35 changes in quality of work life, and the variable of spiritual intelligence with organizational justice mediator explains 0.20 of changes in the quality of working life. The direct effect of organizational justice and quality of work life on self-efficacy is respectively 0.44 and 0.28, respectively. The significant coefficients of all paths are greater than 1.96.
_||_