The Effect of Nitrogen and Boron on Yield and Quality of Sugar beet
Subject Areas : Journal of Crop EcophysiologyHojjat Azaryar 1 , فرزاد جلیلی 2 * , javad khalili mahalle 3 , علی نصرالله زاده اصل 4 , mohsen roshdi 5
1 - Departemant of agronomy IAU of Khoy
2 - گروه کشاورزی-دانشکده کشاورزی- دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی خوی-ایران
3 - Assistant Professor, Department of Agriculture, Khoy Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khoy, Iran.
4 - گروه کشاورزی-دانشکده کشاورزی-دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی خوی
5 - Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Khoy branch, Islamic Azad Unvercity, Khoy, Iran.
Keywords: Biomass, Foliar application, Root yield, Sugar percent,
Abstract :
This study was conducted to investigate the effect of nitrogen and boron on yield and quality of sugar beet (Pirola cultivar) in Khoy and Naghadeh regions as a split plot based on a randomized complete block design with three replications. Nitrogen factor at four levels as N1(%50 at planting and %50 at 6-8 leaf stage), N2 (%50 at planting and %50 at 8-12 leaf stage), N3 (1.5 times N1) and N4 (1.5 times N2) in main plots and boron in four levels B1 (non-usage), B2 (soil usage), B3 (as foliar application in two stages of 6-8 leaves and 8-12 leaves) and B4 (foliar application in two stages 8-12 and 16-20 leaves) as the subplot. The interaction effect of (place*nitrogen) on all traites with out leaf nitrogen content, (place*boron) on leaf boron content, sugar percent, and (place*nitrogen*boron) on leaf boron content, root yield and white sugar content were significant. The results of comparison of mean showed that the highest boron efficiency in increasing root yield observed in N4B4. In both places, root yield gradually increased along with increasing of consumed nitrogen. The maximum root yield (9838 g/m2) in N4 was in Naqadeh which had an increase of 38% compared to the same treatment in Khoy. In both places, regardless of the boron content, with a gradual increase of nitrogen from N1 to N4 sugar percentage decreased. In both places, the efficiency of the treatments in increasing the percentage of sugar belonged to B4 at the lowest nitrogen level (N1), which in all four nitrogen levels was equal to B2 (boron soil consumption). In all four levels of nitrogen, the yield of pure sugar increased with increasing boron consumption. The yield of pure sugar in Naqdeh at all four levels of nitrogen was higher than that of Khoy. It seems that in Naqdeh, due to the high root yield compared to Khoy, pure sugar yield is also higher.Thus, the result of this research, tearment if N1B4 in situation of this research recommended.
• Abbas, F., E. Al-Jbawi, H.S. Al-Deen, and J. Alisha. 2020. Sugar beet (Beta Vulgaris Var Crassa) yield and quality attributrs as affected by nitrogen fertilization and foliar boron application. Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences Research, 2(4):1-6.
• Abdel-Motagally, F.M.F. 2015. Effect of concentration and spraying time of boron on yield and quality traits of sugar beet grown in newly reclaimed soil conditions. Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 46(6): 15- 26.
• Abdou, M.A., E.H. Selim, and M.M.S. Hilal. 2009. Sugar beet productivity and affected by nitrogen fertilizer and cycocel levels under different harvesting dates. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research. 24 (5B), Egypt.
• Afshar, R.K., A. Nilahyane, C. Chen, H. He, W.B. Stevens, and W.M. Iversen. 2019. Impact of conservation tillage and nitrogen on sugarbeet yield and quality. Soil and Tillage Research. 191: 216-223.
• Ahmadpour Dehkordi, A., and M.R. Tadayon, M.R. 2013. The effect of urban wastewater and different types of fertilizers on quantitative and qualitative traits of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Journal of Science, Technology, Agriculture and Natural Resources. 8(2): 117-97. (In Persian).
• Amjadi, P. 2003. Effects of harvest time and variety on qualitative and quantitative characters of root sugar accumulation in sugar beet. MS.c. Theses. Karaj. University of Tehran. (In Persian).
• Anonymus. 2018. FAO. World food and agriculture: Statistical pocketbook. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.FAO, Rome, 254p.http://www.fao.org/economic/ess/ess-publications/ess-earbook/en/.
• Armin, M., and M. Asgharipour. 2012. Effect of time and concentration of boron foliar application on yield and quality of sugar beet. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences. 12(4): 444-448.
• Baradaran Firoozabadi, M. 2002. The effect of morphological and physiological traits of sugerbeet varieties in drought stress. (In Persian).
• Bithi, S. 2019. Effect of foliar application of boron on the growth, yield and quality of tropical sugar beet. M.S.c. Thesis. Department of Agronomy, Bangladesh Agrilultural University, Mymensingh.
• Camacho-Cristobal, J.J., M.B. Herrera-Rodriguez, V.M. Beato, J. Rexach, M.T. Navarro, M. Gochicoa, J. Maldonado, and A. Gonzalez-Fontes. 2008. The expression of several cell wall-related genes in Arabidopasis roots in down-regulate under boron deficiency. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 63(1–3): 351–8.
• Chandan, K., T. Mahapatra, and P. Kumar. 2020. Nutrient management in sugar beet: a review. Pakistan Sugar Journal. 35: 31-44.
• Draycott, A.P., and D.R. Christenson. 2003. Nutrients for sugar beet production, soil plant relationship. CABI Publishing, pp. 1-105.
• Dutton, J., and G. Bowler. 1984. Money is still being wasted on nitrogen fertilizer. British Sugar Beet Review. 2: 75-77.
• Ebrahimipak, N.A., and M. Mostashari. 2012. Evaluation of irrigation water management and boron fertilizer to increase water use efficiency of sugar beet. Water and Irrigation Management. 2(2): 53-67.
• Emami, A. 1996. Methods of plant degradation, Soil and Water Research Institute. Technical Report. No. 982. Tehran. Iran (In Persian).
• Gaderi. J., M.M. Tehrani, F. Hamedi, and K. Haidari. 2020. Effect of municipal solid waste compost and chemical fertilizers on quality and quantity of sugar beet yield and concentration of some nutrients in soil. Journal of Soil Research (Water and Soil). 34(1):47-60. (In Persian).
• Gangwar, M.S., and H.K. Srivastava. 2009. Effect of B application on yield and quality of suqer beet. GB Pant University of Agriculture and Technoloqy, India. Pantanaqar.
• Habibi, D. 2002. Modeling of estimating sugar beet root yield and sugar content in Karaj district. Ph.D. Thesis, Isalamic Azad University, Science and Research branch, Tehran, Iran.
• Helal, F.A., A.S. Taalab, and A.M. Safaa. 2009. Influence of nitrogen and boron nutrition on nutrient balance and sugar beet yield grown in calcareous soil. Ozean Journal of Applied Sciences. 2(1):1-10.
• Hergert, G.W. 2010. Sugar beet fertilization. Sugar Technology. 12: 256-266.
• Hosseinpour, M., A. Soroushzadeh, M. Alikhani, A.M. Khoramian, and D.F. Taleghani. 2006. Evaluation of quantity and quality of sugar beet under drip and furrow irrigation methods in north of Khuzestan. Journal of Sugar beet. 22(1): 39-57.
• Hoffmann, C.M., and B. Mirlinder. 2005. Composition of harmful nitrogen in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.), amino acids, betaine, nitrate as affected by genotype and environment. European Journal of Agronomy. 22: 255-265.
• Jackson, N.E., R.H. Miller, and R.E. Franklin. 1973. The influence of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae on uptake of 90Sr from soil by soybeans. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 5(2): 205-212.
• Jahedi, A., A. Novruzi, M. Hasani, and F. Hamdi. 2012. Effect of irrigation methods and nitrogen on quality and quantity of sugar beet. Journal of Sugar beet. 28(1): 43-53.
• Javaheri, S.H., M. Abdollahian Noghayi, M. Kashani, A.Habibi, and H.Noshad. 2011. Relatinship in leaf chlorophyl content and yield in sugar beet with use of portal chlorophyl meter. Journal of New Finding in Agriculture. 5(4): 355-365.(In Persian).
• Kabu, M., and M.S. Akosman. 2013. Biological effects of boron. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 225: 57–75.
• Kandil, E.E., N.R. Abdelsalam, and A.A.A. El-Aziz. 2020. Efficacy of nano fertilizer, fulvic acid and boron fertilizer on sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) yield and quality. Sugar Technology. 22: 782–791.
• Khajehpour, M. 2004. Industrial plants. Isfahan University Jihad Publications. 571 pages (In Persian).
• Kristek, A., A. Biserka, and S. Kristek. 2006. Effect of the foliar boron fertilization on sugar beet root yield and quality. Agriculture-Scientific and Professional Review. 12(1): 22-26.
• Lamb J.A., M.W. Bredehoeft, and C. Dunsmore. 2011. Nitrogen management strategies for increasing sugar beet root quality. Available at: http://www.sbreb.org/research/soil/soil11/N management Lamb.pdf.
• Last, P.J., A.P. Draycott, A.B. Messem, and D.J. Webb. 1983. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer and irrigation on sugar beet at Brooms barn 1973-1978. Journal of Agricultural Science. Cambridge. 101: 185-205.
• Lehrsch, G.A., B.Brown, R.D. Lentz, J.L. Johnson Mayard, and B. Leytem. 2014. Sugar beet yield and quality when substituting compost or manure for conventional nitrogen fertilizer. Agronomy Journal. 107: 1. 221-231.
• Majidi, A., and H. Tabiezad. 2018. The effect of souece and rate of nitrogen on yield and some quality factors of sugar beet. Journal of Applied Research in Soil. 6(3):118-129. (In Persian).
• Mahapatra, C.K., T. Bhadra, and S.K. Paul. 2020. Nutrient management in sugar beet: A review. Pakistan Sugar Journal. 35(2): 14.
• Malnou C.S., K.W.Jaggard, and D.L. Sparkes. 2008. Nitrogen fertilizer and the efficiency of the sugar beet crop in late summer. European Journal of Agronomy. 28: 47-56.
• Mekdad, A.A. 2015. Sugar beet productivity as affected by nitrogen fertilizer and foliar spraying with boron. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 4: 181–196.
• Mekki, B.B. 2014. Root yield and quality of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in response to foliar application with urea, zinc and manganese in newly reclaimed sandy soil. American-Eurasian Journal Agricultural and Environmental Science. 14 (9): 800-806.
• Nemeat- Alla, E.A., and M.I.H. El- Geddawy. 2008. Response of sugar beet to foliar spraying with micronutrients under different level nitrogen and phosphorous fertilization. Journal of Agricultural Research. 27 (4): 670-691.
• Noshad, H., R. Mohamadian, and F. Hamdi. 2014. Effect of organic fertilizer content of amino acids on nitrogen efficiency and quality and quantity traits of sugar beet. Journal of Sugar beet. 30(2): 167-181.
• Osman, K.T. 2018. Acid soils and acid sulfate soils. In management of soil problems, Springer, Cham, pp: 299-332.
• Ouda Sohier, M.M. 2005. Yield and quality of sugar beet as affected by planting density and nitrogen fertilizer levels in the newly reclaimed soil. Sugar Crop Research Egypt. 32:131-142.
• Przemysław, B., W. Grzebisz, M. Fec, R. Lukowiak, and W. Szczepaniak. 2010. Row method sugar beet fertilization with multicomponent fertilizer based on urea-ammonium nitrate solution as a way to increase nitrogen efficiency. Journal of Central European Agriculture. 11(2): 225-234.
• Rahimi, A., and B. Dolati, and S. Heidarzadeh. 2017. The effect of foliar application of some microelements on the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of sugar beet cultivar Latitia. Applied Soil Research. 5 (2): 108-121 (In Persian).
• Refay, Y.A. 2010. Root yield and quality traits of three sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) varieties in relation to sowing date and stand densities. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 6 (5): 589-594.
• Rehab, I.F., S.S. El Maghraby, E.E. Kandil, and Y.I. Nahed. 2019. Productivity and quality of sugar beet in relation to humic acid and boron fertilization under Nubaria conditions. Alexandria Science Exchange Journal. 40 (1):187-198.
• Reinefeld, E., A. Emmerich, G. Baumgarten, C. Winner, and U. Bei. 1974. Zur Voraussage des Melassezuckers aus Rübenanalysen. Zucker. 27: 2–15.
• Sahin, F., R. Cakmakci, and F. Kantar. 2004. Sugar beet and barley yields in relation to inoculation with N2-fixing and phosphate solubilizing bacteria. Plant and Soil 265: 123–129.
• Shukla, A.K., S.K. Behera, A. Pakhre, and S.K. Chaudhary. 2018. Micronutrients in soils, plants, animals and humans. Indian Journal of Fertilizers. 14(3): 30-54.
• Tlili, A., I. Dridi, S. Fatnassi, H. Hamrouni, and M. Gueddari. 2018. Effect of boron distribution in sugarbeet crop yield in two soils of Dour Ismail irrigated perimeter. Advances in Science, Technology and Innovation. 417-423.