Effect of plant density on some growth and physiological responses, and antioxidant enzymes activities of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under different irrigation levels
Subject Areas : GeneticMohammad Barzali 1 , Mohammad Nasri 2 , Maziyar Karimi Far 3
1 - Golestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Gorgan, Iran
2 - Agronomy Department, Islamic Azad University, Varamin Branch, Varamin, Iran
3 - Agronomy Department, Islamic Azad University, Varamin Branch, Varamin, Iran
Keywords: Enzyme, Supplementary irrigation, Grain yield, Plant density, Leaf chlorophyll index,
Abstract :
In order to investigate the effect of different levels of plant density and irrigation on some morphologic and physiologic responses and antioxidants activities in chickpea cv. Hashem, an experiment was conducted at Goonbad-e-Kavoos region during 2012-2013 cropping season. Treatments were arranged as split plot in randomized complete block design with four replications. Different irrigation regime levels (rainfed without irrigation, irrigation at flowering stage, and irrigation during pod filling stage) were assigned to main plots and sub-plots comprised of different plant densities (20, 30, 50, and 70 plants/m2). Results showed that different irrigation regimes significantly affected traits except for days to 50% flowering and plant height but plant density factor had significant impacts only on days to 50% flowering, plant height, days to physiologic maturity, seed yield, biologic yield, and leaf chlorophyll index. Results showed that irrigation caused significant increase in leaf relative water content and leaf chlorophyll index while it decreased grain protein content, superoxide dismutase and catalase activities. Maximum and minimum grain protein contents were produced in no-irrigation and irrigation during pod filling stage, respectively. Meanwhile, the maximum and minimum grain yield was gained by irrigation at flowering stage and rainfed without irrigation, respectively. Under plant density levels, the maximum and minimum grain yield was produced in 70 plants/m2 and 20 plants/m2, respectively. Irrigation at flowering stage × 70 plants/m2 had the highest grain yield among all treatments of the study.
Aebi, H. (1984). Catalase in vitro. Methods in Enzymology. 105: 121-126.
AnjamShoa, S., Moeinrad, H. and Ebrahimi, H. (2011). The effects if different irrigation levels on grain yield and yield components of four chickpea cultivars (Cicer arietinum L.) in Mashhad climatic condition. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research. 2(2): 69-82. (In Farsi).
Ayaz, S., McNeil, D.L., Mckenzie, B.A. and Hill, G.D. (2009). Population and sowing depth effects on yield components of grain legumes. Proceeding of Australian Agronomy Conference. 29: 9-15.
Benton, J. J. (1991). Kjeldahl method for nitrogen determination. Athens, GA: Micro-Macro Publishing. p. 79.
Bhattacharjee, S. (2005). Reactive oxygen species and oxidative burst: Roles in stress, senescence and signal transduction in plants. Current. 89(7): 1113-1121.
Dogan, E., Kahraman, A. and Bucak, B. (2013). Varying irrigation rates effect on yield and yield components of chickpea. Irrigation Science. 31(5): 903-909.
Fallah, S., Ehsanzadeh, P., and Daneshvar, M. (2005). Grain yield and yield components in three chickpea genotypes under dryland conditions with and without supplementary irrigation at different plant densities in Khorram-Abad, Lorestan. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science. 36(3): 719- 731. (In Persian).
Ghobadi, M., Salahi, H. and Mansourifar, S. (2014). The effects of supplemental irrigation and N fertilizer application type on seed yield and yield components in Chickpea. Journal of Agricultural Science. 16(3): 585-598.
Gholami, Z., Ehsan Zadeh, P. and Razmjoo, J. (2015). Irrigation regimes effect on yield and yield components of chickpea cultivars in autumn and spring cultivation in Lorestan province. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 46(1): 123-135.
Gill, S., and Tuteja, N. (2010). Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 48: 909-930.
Gunes, A., Inal, A. and Adak, M.S. (2008). Effect of drought stress implemented at pre- or post-anthesis stage on some physiological parameters as screening criteria in chickpea cultivars. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology. 55(1): 59-67.
Jalilian, J., Modarres Sanavi, S.A.M. and Sabaghpour, S.H. (2005). Effect of plant density and supplemental irrigation on yield, yield components and protein content of four chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars under dry land conditions. Agricultural and Natural Resources Magazine. 12(5): 1-9.
Kanouni, H. (2016).Genetic variability, heritability, and interrelationships between seed yield and related components of chickpea genotypes under dryland conditions. Iranian Journal of Filed Crop Science. 47(1): 155-163.
Karimi, B. and Fernia, A. (2009). Investigating of agronomic traits, yield and yield components of chickpea cultivars with supplemental irrigation. Advance Science in Agriculture. 17: 83-90.
Khani Karim Abadi, Y., Gholami Zali, A. and Esavand, H. R. (2016). Investigation of some physiological response and Chickpea cultivars yield to irrigation regimes and salinity. Crops and Fruits Production and Processing. 19(6):69-83.
Luhova, L., Lebeda, A., Hederrova, D. and Pec, P. (2003). Activities of amine oxidase, peroxidase and catalase in seedling of pisum sativum L. under different light conditions. Plant Soil Environment. 49: 151-157.
Macar, T.K. and Ekmekci, Y. (2008). PSII photochemistry and antioxidant responses of a chickpea variety exposed to drought. Naturforsch. 6:583-590.
Mafakheri, A., Siosemardeh, A., Bahramnejad, B., Struik, P. C. and Sohrabi, Y. (2011). Effect of drought stress and subsequent recovery on protein, carbohydrate contents, catalase and peroxidase activities in three chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 5(10): 1255-1260.
Meidner, H. (1984). Class experiments in plant physiology. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data, London.
Mirzaei Heydari, M., Nouri, M. and Khogami, H. (2009). The effects of plant density and irrigation levels on agronomic traits, leaf chlorophyll contents and light penetration in canopy bottom in Chickpea cultivars. Iranian Crop Science. 40(30): 113-121. (In Farsi)
Misra, H.P. and Fridorich, I. (1972). The generation of super oxide radical during auto oxidation. The Journal Biological Chemistry. 247: 6960-6969.
Mohammadi, A., Habibi, D., Rohami, M., and Mafakheri, S. (2011). Effect of drought stress on antioxidant enzymes activity of some chickpea cultivars. American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environment Science. 11(6): 782-785.
Naseri, R., Rahimi, M.J., Siyadat, S.A. and Mirzaei, A. (2015). The effects of supplementary irrigation and different plant densities on morphological traits, yield and its components and protein content of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in Sirvan region in Ilam province. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research. 6(1): 78-91.
Ouji, A., El-Bok, S., Mouelhi, M., Ben Younes, M. and Kharrat, M. (2016). Yield and yield components of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) as influenced by supplemental irrigation under semi-arid region of Tunisia. World Journal of Agricultural Research. 4(5): 153-157.
Pasandi, M., Janmohammadi, M. and KarimZadeh, R. (2014).Evaluation of genotypic response of Kabuli Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars to irrigation regimes in northwest of Iran. Agriculture. 60(1): 22-300.
Patel, P.K. and Hemantaranjan, A. (2012). Antioxidant defense system in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Influence by drought stress implemented at pre and post anthesis stage. American Journal of Plant Physiology. 7(4): 164-173.
Patel, R.K. and Hemantaranjan, A. (2013). Differential sensitivity of chickpea genotypes to salicylic acid and drought stress during pre-anthesis: effects on total chlorophyll, phenolics, seed protein and protein profiling. The Bioscan. 8(2): 569-574.
Patel, R.K., Hemantaranjan, A., Sarma, B.K. and Singh, R. (2011). Growth and antioxidant system under drought stress in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) as sustained by salicylic acid. Journal of Stress Physiology and Biochemistry. 7(4):130-144.
Raey, Y., Demaghsi, N. and Seied Sharifi, R. (2007). Effect of different levels of irrigation and plant density on grian yield and its components in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Deci type cv. Kaka. Iranian Journal of Crop Science. 9(4): 371-381.
Rahbarian, R., Khavarinejad, R. and Ganjali, A. (2011). Drought stress effects on photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence and water relations in tolerant and susceptible chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes. Acat Biol. Cracoviensia. Series Botanica. 53(1): 47-56.
Roy, H., Biswas, P.K. and Achakzai, M.K. (2016). Effect of supplemental application of Nitrogen, irrigation and hormone on the yield and yield components of Chickpea. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 12(1): 70-77.
Shaban, M., Lak, M. and Rahmati Motlagh, Z. (2012).Response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars to integrated application of Zinc nutrient with water stress. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences. 15(4): 1074-1082.
Shaban, M., Lak, M., Hamidvand, Y. and Rahmati Motlagh, Z. (2012). Response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars to integrated application of Zinc nutrient with water stress. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences. 4(15):1074-1082.
Shamsi, K. (2010). The effect of sowing date and row spacing on yield and yield components on Hashem chickpea variety under rainfed condition. African Journal of Biotech. 9: 7-11.
Silva, L. L., Duarte, I. and Lourenço, E. (2014).Yield and water productivity of five chickpea varieties under supplemental irrigation in contrasting years. Irrigation Science. 32: 393.
Talebi, R., Ensafi, M.H., Baghebani, N., Karami, E. and Mohammadi, K. (2013). Physiological responses of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes to drought stress. Environmental and Experimental Biology. 11: 9-15.
Ulemale, C.S., Mate, S.N. and Deshmukh, D.V. (2013). Physiological indices for drought tolerance in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). World Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 9(2): 123-131.