• Home
  • gholamali seifi zeinab
  • Published Issues

    OpenAccess
    • List of Articles gholamali seifi zeinab

      • Open Access Article

        1 - Explaining the establishment of suspension contracts from the perspective of Iranian jurisprudence and public law
        mohammadhosein Sayahi gholamali seifi Rahim Sayah
        Some Islamic jurists consider the suspension of contracts to be invalid by arguing for rational and narrative argument and the lack of establishment of contradictions and contradictions with the dogma of contracts. Considering that the purpose of the contractors is to e More
        Some Islamic jurists consider the suspension of contracts to be invalid by arguing for rational and narrative argument and the lack of establishment of contradictions and contradictions with the dogma of contracts. Considering that the purpose of the contractors is to establish the obligation and fulfill the effects according to the contract, so by accepting the suspension in the source and joining it to the punitive contracts, structuring and denying the beginning of the suspension in the contracts and deviating from realism and denying the beginning of the suspension in the contracts. It is possible. On the other hand, those who believe in this theory by descriptive-analytical method and by inductive proof of homogeneous examples of suspension of contracts in jurisprudence and administrative law and the presentation of compelling arguments such as necessity, rationalism and thinking in the common realization of suspended contracts and jurisprudence Administrative contracts were suspended in Iranian law and its applicability formulation was considered necessary.The result is that the coherence of religious criticism is allowed to explore the utilitarian theory of "suspension of contracts in administrative law" with the homogeneous critique of the logic of jurisprudence and law in legalism by changing attitudes to civil sociology and focusing on theorizing theory In contracts based on rationalism, it is necessary to avoid superficiality and independence of the legal system of thought. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        2 - Justifying the Principle of not Paying Attention to the Objections in Patent Rights from Jurisprudential Point of View
        Ahmad Esfandiari gholamali seifi zeinab
        Unlike the legal system that considers the transfer of debt to be absolutely independent of of influence of cause and even if it proves to be null or void, it has been recognized in accordance with the general rules of Islamic jurisprudence and civil law. Also, it is co More
        Unlike the legal system that considers the transfer of debt to be absolutely independent of of influence of cause and even if it proves to be null or void, it has been recognized in accordance with the general rules of Islamic jurisprudence and civil law. Also, it is considered to be one of the pillars of any legal action, and such a transfer is, as a matter of fact, absolutely influenced by the original relationship. In the relationship between the hands entered in negotiable instrument, there is an important deviation, from the general mentioned rule, and that is when the negotiable instrument is circulated after its signature and submission to the first  holder by indorsment, there is not heared the objections of  invalidation or inexistence of original relationship by previous hands. This concept of negotiable instruments  law have been called not Paying Attention to the Objections in Patent Rights. Because of the appearance of a clear conflict with established jurisprudential rules and traditional laws and invalidity as the origin of the right, it is unacceptable for a person bound by jurisprudential principles but in order to consider institutions  in which the lawmaker has appointed persons to be trustworthy to appearance or merely because they have genuine confidence in the emergence of the rightful owner, on the one hand, and the precision of the jurisprudential institutions that make individuals responsible for the caused damages on the other, it obliges them to e indicate that the mentioned principle is jurisprudentially justifiable. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        3 - A Jurisprudential-Legal Study of Ghahri Set-off with a Comparative Study in Civil Law and English Legal Systems
        احمد اسفندیاری gholamali seifi zeinab ALI ZARE
        Despite of acceptance of possibility of set-off by most legal systems, There are various approaches in expressing the concept of coercive set-off, it’s grounds, realm and effects. Some approaches such as rational set-off, canonic set-off and voluntary set-off in Islamic More
        Despite of acceptance of possibility of set-off by most legal systems, There are various approaches in expressing the concept of coercive set-off, it’s grounds, realm and effects. Some approaches such as rational set-off, canonic set-off and voluntary set-off in Islamic jurisprudence and automatic set-off, legal set-off and declaratory set-off in civil law system has used which as an substantive rules causes to extinction of two mutual debts and the extinction of both of them. On the contrary, in English legal system, except in exceptional cases, set-off is a procedural rule that, if invoked by defendant and accepted, it merely results in the order to stay the main action by court in the amount of counterclaim and not necessarily occurring of substantive set-off and extinction of two mutual debts. Traces of such an approach are seen by some Sunni jurists and similar institutions as the lien in Islamic jurisprudence. Article 295 of Iranian Civil Code, raised the phrase"Ghahri set-off", on some insights in Islamic jurisprudence and civil law system without explicitly defining it’s meaning. The earliest commentators of civil law, interpreted that phrase as rational set-off and automatic set-off, Although the French legislator had replaced the legal set-off in the 1804 Civil Code, which required the defendant to plead in court, in the 2016 reforms, she again turned to automatic set-off. Careful attention to narrative documents of jurisprudential and thinking on the terms used in civil law brings it closer to the concept of voluntary set-off in jurisprudence and legal set-off and declaratory set-off in civil law. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        4 - Explaining the establishment of suspension contracts from the perspective of Iranian jurisprudence and public law
        mohammadhosein Sayahi gholamali seifi zeinab Rahim Sayah
        Understanding suspended contracts and determining their place in Iranian jurisprudence and explaining their nature in various forms are challenging issues in the Iranian legal system. However, the existence of different thoughts and ideas regarding the validity or inval More
        Understanding suspended contracts and determining their place in Iranian jurisprudence and explaining their nature in various forms are challenging issues in the Iranian legal system. However, the existence of different thoughts and ideas regarding the validity or invalidity of suspended contracts has created doubts about their effectiveness. Some Islamic jurists consider suspension in contracts to be invalid, arguing on the basis of rational and textual arguments, the lack of establishment of enforceability, and the incompatibility with the certainty of contracts. This is because the purpose of the contracting parties in establishing contracts is to create obligations and realize the effects of the contract. It seems that with the acceptance of suspension in inception and its attachment to enforceable contracts, the justification of suspended contracts in Iranian law is possible within the framework of suspensive conditions. In this regard, those who believe in the validity of suspension, using a descriptive-analytical method and referring to examples of suspended contracts in jurisprudence and law, argue on the basis of the necessity and rationality of developing and benefiting from suspended contracts and avoiding incorrect jurisprudential insights (non-acceptance of suspended contracts) believe that it is necessary to consider the conclusion of contracts in a suspended manner in Iranian law. The conclusion is that, by analyzing and utilitarianism of suspension in contracts, and also by criticizing the identification of the logic of jurisprudence and law in legalism with a new approach to civil sociology (drafting laws that are in the best interests of society) and turning away from the misconception of the inadmissibility of using analogy in jurisprudential interpretation to explain suspension in contracts on the basis of rationality, and avoiding formalism and the independence of the system of thought of jurists is necessary. Manuscript profile