Void Clauses†are clauses that make a lawful thing unlawful or an unlawful thing lawful or its requirement is in conflict with a fixed levied sentence. Undoubtedly these clauses are void and the obligor not only doesn’t have to do them but is not allowed to do them. More
Void Clauses†are clauses that make a lawful thing unlawful or an unlawful thing lawful or its requirement is in conflict with a fixed levied sentence. Undoubtedly these clauses are void and the obligor not only doesn’t have to do them but is not allowed to do them. The disagreement point is whether void clauses are the nullifier of contract too. The jurists that have considered the illegal clause nullifies, generally referred to lack of basis of “intention†and “consent†and also the emergence of “both sides’ ignorance of properties†in case of nullifies of clause and rarely some mentioned “lack closeness to illegal clause†as a part of correctness of the contract. In contrary, the others answered to these objections in detail. In this group of jurists’ view the clause compared to the main contract has adjunct aspect and is unable to disrupt in main basis. In this article, we have tried to do a correct judgment between these two opinions. On Imam Khomeini’s view there is no reason for the illegal clause to be diriment it and the other reasons of nullifies of void clauses with regard to legal nature of the clause - obligation by the same obligation - is not acceptable and if it was accepted it wouldn’t include all the void clauses. Of course, stipulation is with a tacit obligation in which obliges able to terminate the contract in case the clause doesn’t come off or terminate the contract as the reason of the tacit of the clause.
Manuscript profile
The Respect for property is one of the major objectives that the holy legislator imposes them in which the law does not respect property for them. The basic question is if Muslim travel to the country of disbeliever, is it possible to rub his possessives because there i More
The Respect for property is one of the major objectives that the holy legislator imposes them in which the law does not respect property for them. The basic question is if Muslim travel to the country of disbeliever, is it possible to rub his possessives because there isn’t any respect for his possessives and seize his properties or can term less but only seize in possessives of Infidel Atheism. This research tries to study about Infidel Atheism and prove that the first principle in Islam is to respect the property of others expect the Infidel Atheism. But sure the hostile unbelievers are actually at war with Muslims and they are thinking of damage to Muslims. The author analyses this subject completely in this article.
Manuscript profile
