Unit notice, as one possible reason, has been considered from two main aspects in the language of principles. One is the proof of its validity, and the other is the determination of its domain which acceptance of validity is supposed to be more
More
Unit notice, as one possible reason, has been considered from two main aspects in the language of principles. One is the proof of its validity, and the other is the determination of its domain which acceptance of validity is supposed to be more important. Referring to the arguments of the Arbaa reasons as well as the methods of wise men, the scholars of the principles have argued against the theory that does not fully consider the unit notice as valid and as the trigger of notice and practice. Meanwhile, some have fully understood the implication of the verses on this issue and faced the challenges of method of wise men with the drawback of retribution by the lawyer. On the other hand, some have considered the method of the wise men as the only reason for the validity of the unit notice, and by attaching related narratives as validity from the lawyer have tried to prove the authority of unit notice. Some others, while accepting the implications of the verse of Al-Naba Surah, have considered the method of wise men as one of the reasons for the authority of the unit notice. In this paper, we will examine the integrity of the rationale for the validity of the unit notice through examining the principles and searching for the status of the wise men in proving the authority of the unit notice.
Manuscript profile
