Today, according to the law and the opinion of some jurists, intercession is valid only in divisible immovable property and is not permissible in indivisible movable and immovable property. The present study was conducted by descriptive-analytical method and seeks to an More
Today, according to the law and the opinion of some jurists, intercession is valid only in divisible immovable property and is not permissible in indivisible movable and immovable property. The present study was conducted by descriptive-analytical method and seeks to answer questions such as; "What is the jurisprudential ruling of intercession on movable and immovable property, which cannot be divided according to the four jurisprudential arguments in Imami jurisprudence?" In the verses of the Holy Qur'an, intercession is not used in its idiomatic sense. The narrations of the second category do not have the ability to conflict with the narrations of the first category in terms of authenticity. Regarding the reason of reason, it should be said that the existential nature of preference is based on three principles; The first principle; The no-harm rule is the second principle of the sanctity of the Muslim property and the third principle is the related rule.
Manuscript profile