Fuzzy Inference System Predictor of Good Governance against Administrative Corruption

Subject Areas : Public Policy In Administration

Hamed  Rahmani ¹ (PhD student of Public Administration, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran [e-mail] (Corresponding))
Morteza  Mousakhani ² (Associate Professor of Public Administration Department, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran)
Gholamreza  Memarzade Tehran ³ (Associate Professor of Public Administration Department, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran)

Received: 2015-12-29 Accepted : 2016-01-22 Published : 2015-02-17

Keywords: Corruption, administrative corruption, Good governance, Fuzzy Inference&#x0D, &#x0D, System,

Abstract :

Today, the term ' corruption ' can be found in many news headlines. Increasing of corruption in organizations and other institutions can be recognized only with reference to the press and a variety of mass media. Recently announced the corruption perception index, Iran was among the countries with high corruption. This study follows an extensive review of previous research literature to create a comprehensive model for measuring administrative corruption and the definitions of fuzzy sets of factors affecting administrative corruption has been used here, including predictive variables of good governance in the world bank; the right to comment and accountability; political stability and absence of violence; government effectiveness; regulatory quality and rule of law. In this study, all the different dimensions of good governance against corruption were considered as input of fuzzy inference system and administrative corruption was used as an output. After that, membership functions and fuzzy rules, a fuzzy inference system measuring administrative corruption was designed using good governance indices. At the end, the outgoing model was compared with the Experts' opinion. In this study, the rule writing was created, using the comment of five university professors. The results indicated that the results of the Experts' opinion and those of fuzzy inference sustem were close, which indicates the validity of the system. It can be concluded that one of the main reason for this validation, is the identification of appropriate metrics to predict. In this study these metrics were obtained from the World Bank. The results revealed that the index of the rule of law in governance has a significant influence on the model output which shows the reduction of administrative corruption and by its increasing and decreasing, the level of anticipated corruption in the organization increases and decreases.

References:

آتشک، محمد (1390)، مفهوم فساد اداری در نظام آموزشی کشور، فصلنامه اخلاق در علوم و فن آوری، شماره 3.

حبیبی، نادر (1375)، فساد اداری: عوامل موثر و روشهای مبارزه، موسسه فرهنگی انتشارات وثقی.

زاهدی، شمس السادات (1388)، بررسی عوامل موثر بر کاهش فساد اداری (مطالعه موردی در شهرداری تهران)، مدیریت فرهنگ سازمان ‌، صص 29-55.

عباس زادگان، سید محمد (1383)، فساد ادار،  تهران، دفترپژوهش‌های فرهنگی.

مقدسی، علیرضا (1389)، کاربرد حکمرانی شایسته در مبارزه با فساد اداری، فصلنامه سیاسی و اداری، صص 281-292.

منصور نژاد، محمد (1384)، بررسی تاثیر فساد اداری بر امنیت اجتماعی، مجله توسعه مدیریت، شماره 66.

Azra, Azyumardi (2010). ISLAM, CORRUPTION, GOOD GOVERNANCE, AND CIVIL SOCIETY: THE INDONESIAN EXPERIENCE, Pluto Journals, pp. 109-125

Blackburn, K., Gonzalo, F., & Forgues, P.  (2010). Financial liberalization, bureaucratic corruption and economic development. Journal of International Money and Finance, 29, 1321-1339.

Danesh, Sedigheh , Farnoosh, Rahman, Tahereh Razzaghnia (2015), Fuzzy nonparametric regression based on adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system, Journal of  Neurocomputing, pp 1450–1460

Desta ,yemane (2006), Designing Anti-Corruption Strategies for Developing Countries : A Country Study of Eritrea, Journal of Developing Societies. pp 421-449.

Etzioni, A. (1961) A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations: On Power, Involvement, and Their Correlates. New York: Free Press.

Gupta, S., Davoodi, H., & Alsonso-Terme, R.  (2002). Does corruption affect income inequality and poverty? Economics of Governance, 3: 45.

Hill, Michael, Hupe, Peter (2002), Implementing Public Policy: Governance in Theory and in Practice, Sage Publication, p 178

Klir, G.J., &Folger, T.A.  (1998), Fuzzy set, uncertainly, and information, Prentice-Hall.

Ksenia  (2008). Can Corruption and Economic Crime be Controlled in Developing Countries and if so, is it Cost-effective?. Journal of Financial crime, 15 (2), 223-233.

Lindblom, C.E. (1977) Politics and Markets: The World’s Political-Economic Systems. New York: Basic Books.

Mashali, Behzad (2012), Analyzing the relationship between perceived grand corruption and petty corruption in developing countries: case study of Iran, International Review of Administrative Sciences. pp 775-787

UNDP (2008), A Users’ Guide to Measuring  Corruption, available at www.undp.org/[e-mail]

World Bank (2003), Better Governance for Development in the Middle East and North Africa , available at www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance.

World Bank  (2007^a), Worldwide Governance Indicators 2007: Country Data Report for Iran, 1996- 2006,available at  www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance/.

World Bank  (2007^b), A Decade of  Measuring The quality of Governance, available at www.govindicators.org

World Bank. Poverty reduction and economic management, available at www.Worldbank.org/public sector/anticorruption/corruption/coridx.htm.