The best method of teaching mathematics to reduce math anxiety using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) ranking in a two-stage network

Subject Areas : Data Envelopment Analysis

ensieh khorramian ¹ , Mohsen Rostamy ^{2 *} , Ahmad Shahvarani ³ , Tofigh Allahviranloo ⁴

1 - Department of Mathematic,SR.C, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 - Department of Mathematic,SR.C, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 - Department of Mathematic,SR.C, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
4 - Department of Mathematic,SR.C, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Received: 2025-03-23 Accepted : 2025-06-22 Published : 2025-01-13

Keywords: Math Anxiety, Network Data Envelopment Analysis (NDEA), Ranking, Sexton, Evaluation.,

Abstract :

Mathematics education and math anxiety are closely intertwined. Math anxiety is a psychological phenomenon that can negatively impact an individual’s ability to learn and perform mathematical tasks. Various teaching methods can effectively reduce this anxiety, as math anxiety is a significant barrier to effective learning in this subject. Identifying and implementing the best teaching methods to alleviate this anxiety can greatly enhance students’ academic performance. One innovative approach for evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of different teaching methods is the use of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA).

In this study, Network Data Envelopment Analysis (NDEA) and Sexton’s ranking method are employed to examine different methods of teaching mathematics and their impact on reducing math anxiety. In the two-stage DEA approach, various processes and outputs are analyzed in two stages. This allows for a more comprehensive evaluation of the efficiency of the educational system.

The primary objective of this research is to propose an optimal method for teaching mathematics using two-stage DEA to reduce math anxiety among students. Additionally, this method facilitates a more precise identification of the strengths and weaknesses of the educational system, allowing for benchmarking against successful schools.

In this study, several teaching methods were implemented in classrooms and subsequently evaluated using the proposed method. The results indicated that the game-based method achieved the highest ranking. Based on these findings, efforts will be made to apply this method in classrooms to reduce students’ math anxiety effectively.

References:

1. Ashcraft, M. H., & Krause,J.A. (2007). Working memory, math performance, and math anxiety. Psychotic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 243-248.
2. Kazelskis, R., Reeves, C.,Kersh, M.E.,Bailery, G.,Cole, K., Larmon, M.,Hall, I,. Holliday, D, C. (2000). Mathematics anxiety and test anxiety: separate constructs? Journal of Experimental Education. 68(2), 137-146.
3. Vinson, B. M.(2001) A comparison of preservice teachers mathematics anxiety before and after methods class. Emphasizing manipulatives. Early Childhood Education Journal, 29(2),89-94
4. Scholoenfeld, A. H.(1989). Teaching mathematical thinking and problem solving. In L. B. Resnick and B. L. Klopfer (Eds.), Toward the thinking.
5. Tobias, S. (1993). OvercomingMath Anxiety (2 end ed). New york. W. W. Norton. Thomas,J. (2006). The effects on student’s.
6. Alamolhodaei ,H.and Farsad, N. (2009).A Psychological Model Applied to Mathemacal Problem Solving. Journal of the Korea Society of Mathematical Education Series D: Research in Mathematical Educator. Vol. 13, NO, 3, pp. 181-195.
7. Alamolhodaei, H. (2009). A Working Memory Model Applied to Mathematical WordProblemSolving. Asia Pacific Education Review 10(1), 183-192.
8. Santrock ,J.W.(2003). Psychology. (7th Edition), Boston. The McGraw-Hill Companies.
9. Ma, X.(1999). A meta-analysis of the relationship berweenanxity toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics. Journal for Research in mathematics Education, 30, pp. 520-540.
10. . Mirzaei, A., Agha Mohammadi, M., Saranzay, f., Fallahi, F. Assessing students' learning weaknesses and providing useful strategies to improve their learning by emphasizing mathematics lessons, the first international conference on the application of research and development in engineering sciences.2016 [persian]
11. Amini, M., Madani, A, Baghsheykhi, F.Weakness of learning and academic performance of high school girls; Analysis of the experiences of female teachers, Scientific Journal of Women and Culture.2019. 11 (41), 7-31[persian].
12. Cooper, W. W., Rhodes, E. : Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational research. 2 (6), 429-444 (1978).
13. Lewis, H. F., & Sexton, T. R. (2004), Network DEA: efficiency analysis of organizations with complex internal structure. Computers and Operations Research, 31(9), 1365-1410.
14. Hsieh, L. F., & lin, L. H. (2010), “A performance evaluation model for international tourist hotels in Taiwan-An application of the relation network DEA”.International journal of Hospitality Management, 29, 14-24
15. Kao, C., & Hwang, S. N. (2008). Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: an application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. European journal of operational research, 185(1), 418-429.
16. Amirteimoori, A. (2013). A DEA two-stage decision processes with shared resources. Central european journal of operations research, 21(1), 141-151.
17. Amirteimoori, A. R., Shahroodi, K. & Mahmoodkiani, F. S. (2015). Network data envelopment analysis: application to Gas companies in Iran. International journal of applied operational research, 5(1), 1-16.
18. Zhang, J., Wu, Q., & Zhou, Z. (2019). A two-stage DEA model for resource allocation in industrial pollution treatment and its application in China. Journal of cleaner production, 228, 29-39.
19. Wang, Q., Wu, Z., & Chen, X. (2019). Decomposition weights and overall efficiency in a two-stage DEA model with shared resources. Computers & industrial engineering, 136, 135-148.
20. Tsai, M. C., Cheng, C. H., Nguyen, V. T., & Tsai, M. I. (2020). The theoretical relationship between the CCR model and the two-stage DEA model with an application in the efficiency analysis of the financial industry. Symmetry, 12(5), 712.
21. Sexton, T.R., Silkman, R.H. and Hogan, A.J. (1986) Data Envelopment Analysis: Critique and Extensions. In: Silkman, R.H., Ed., Measuring Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 73-105.