Examining the relationship between systematic innovation of schools and organizational entrepreneurship with the mediation of organizational ambidexterity in schools (Case study: Technical and Vocational Schools of Tehran Province)
Subject Areas : Methods and technics of creativity and innovation, creativity and innovation engineering.
maryam ghaderi sheykhee abadi
1
(Ph.D. in Educational Management, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Literature & Humanities, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran)
fakhrossadat Nasiri
2
(Associate professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Dabir Shahid Rajaei University, Tehran, Iran)
Mahmood Taajobi
3
(Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Human Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran)
Afshin Afzali
4
(Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Human Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran)
Keywords: Organizational Entrepreneurship, Technical And Vocational Schools, systematic innovation of schools, organizational ambidexterity in schools,
Abstract :
Purpose: The purpose of the research was to investigate the relationship between systematic innovation of schools in organizational entrepreneurship with the mediation of organizational ambidexterity in schools.Method: Quantitative research method is correlation studies and structural equation modeling approach based on covariance. The research community was the teachers of technical and vocational schools in Tehran province. A sample of 364 teachers was selected using random sampling and based on Cochran's formula. From the researcher-made questionnaire of systematic innovation; Jansen(2006) organizational ambidexterity questionnaire and Hughes & morgan(2007) organizational entrepreneurship questionnaire were used. The reliability and validity of the questionnaires were checked with Cronbach's alpha techniques, content validity ratio, exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Structural equation modeling was used by lisrel software to analyze the data.Findings: The findings showed that the systematic innovation of schools and organizational ambidexterity have a direct and positive relationship with organizational entrepreneurship at the level of 0.05; The systematic innovation of schools due to organizational ambidexterity has a positive indirect relationship with organizational entrepreneurship at the level of 0.05; Also, the systematic innovation of schools and organizational ambidexterity are able to explain 0.30 of the variance of organizational entrepreneurship.Conclusion: systematic innovation can provide the field of entrepreneurship. Also, systematic innovation strengthens organizational duality. Organizational ambidexterity is also one of the factors influencing the promotion of entrepreneurship.
امرایی، فروزان؛ قدمپور، عزتاله؛ شریفی، طیبه و غضنفری، احمد. (1398). مقایسه تأثیر آموزش مهارتهای وسعت بخشی تفکر و راهبردهای یادگیری خودتنظیمی بر خلاقیت (سیالی، ابتکار، انعطافپذیری، بسط) دانشآموزان. نشریه علمی ابتکار و خلاقیت در علوم انسانی، 8(4)، 97-128.
امین بیدختی، علی اکبر و مالکی، فاطمه. (1393). تأثیر آموزش مهارت تریز در تقویت روحیه کارآفرینی. فصلنامه علمی- پژوهشی رهیافتی نو در مدیریت آموزشی، 5(1)، 153-174.
جبل عاملی، مهسا؛ مظفر، فرهنگ؛ قاسمی، وحید و کریمی، محمود. (1398). کاربست رکن ایدهآلی نوآوری نظامیافته در طراحی معماری. نشریه علمی ابتکار و خلاقیت در علوم انسانی، 9(3)، 231-260.
حسنزاده ثمرین، تورج؛ سیفالهی، ناصر و ایمانیفرد، مهدی (1399). بررسی نقش میانجی سرمایه اجتماعی سازمانی در رابطه با رهبری دوسوتوانی و هوش رقابتی در شرکت آرتاویل تایر اردبیل. فصلنامه توسعه کارآفرینی، 13(2)، 181-198.
حسینپور، مریم. (1397). چالشهای فرهنگی و اقتصادی در هنرستانهای فنی و حرفهای و کاردانش. مجله رشد آموزش فنی و حرفهای و کاردانش، 13(3)، 30-39.
قدمپور، عزتاله؛ امیریان، لیلا و خدایی، سجاد. (1397). اثربخشی آموزش تفکر انتقادی بر نگرش به خلاقیت و نشاط ذهنی دانشجویان علوم پزشکی. نشریه علمی ابتکار و خلاقیت در علوم انسانی، 7(4)، 219-240.
Abdissa, G., Ayalew, A., Illes, C. B., & Dunay, A. (2021). Effects of Corporate Entrepreneurship Dimensions on Organizational Performance: Case of Small and Medium Enterprises in Holeta Town, Ethiopia. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(4), 1-20.
Abrudan, D., & Nastase, M. (2012). Realities and challenges concerning entrepreneurship education in Romania. Journal of Review of General Management, Spiru Haret University, Faculty of Management Brasov, 16(2), 126-138.
Belski, I. (2011). TRIZ course enhances thinking and problem solving skills of engineering students. Journal of Procedia Engineering, 9(1), 450-460.
Bertoncelli, T., Mayer, O., & Lynass, M. (2016). Creativity, Learning Techniques and TRIZ. Journal of Procedia CIRP, 39(1), 191-196.
Curriculum Development Section (2013). Dokumen Sukatan Kurikulum Pembelajaran KSSM, Putrajaya, Malaysia. Available at: http://bpk.moe.gov.my/index.php/terbitanbpk/kurikulum-sekolah-menengah/ category/10-kssm
Duval-Couetil, N., Reed Roads, T., & Haghighi, S. (2011). Engineering students and entrepreneurship education: Involvement, Attitudes, and Outcomes. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28(2), 425-435.
Ekmekci, I., & Nebati, E. E. (2019). Triz Methodology and Applications. Journal of Procedia Computer Science, 158(1), 303–315.
Elert, N., Andersson, F. W., & Wennberg, K. (2015). The Impact of Entrepreneurship Education in High School on Long-Term Entrepreneurial Performance. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 111(1), 209-223.
Garcia-Gonzalez, A., & Ramirez-Montoya, M.S. (2021). Social Entrepreneurship Education: Changemaker Training at the University. Journal of Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 11(5), 1236–1251.
Gimmon, E. (2014). Mentoring as a practical training in higher education of entrepreneurship. Journal of Education and Training, 56(8/9), 814–825.
Gopinath, U. M., Nawaz, N., Gajenderan, V., & Balasubramaniyan, H. (2021). Antecedents of Emotional Intelligence: Perceived Organizational Support Impact on Ambidextrous Behavior of Standalone Business School Faculty. Journal of Sustainability, 13(8227), 1-12.
Guerrero, M. (2021). Ambidexterity and Entrepreneurship Studies: A Literature Review and Research Agenda. Editorial Board, Journal of Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 17(5-6), 436-650.
Guner, S., & Ilker, K. O. S. E. (2020). Creative Problem Solving Technique Application Areas of TRIZ: Suggestions for Use in Healthcare Sector. Journal of Ekonomi Isletme ve Maliye Arastırmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 185-205.
Hughes, M., & Morgan, R. E. (2007). Deconstructing the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and business performance at the embryonic stage of firm growt. Journal of Industrial Marketing Management, 36(1), 651–661.
Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J. & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Journal of Management Science, 52(11), 1661-1674.
Kiong, T. T., Saien, S., Heong, Y. M., & Mohamad, M. M. (2017). TRIZ: An Alternate Way to Solve Problem for Student. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(2), 2222-6990.
Kusio, T., & Fiore, M. (2020). The perception of entrepreneurship culture by internal university stakeholders. Journal of European Business Review, 32(3), 443-457.
Lee, S. M., Chang, D., & Lim, S. B. (2005). Impact of entrepreneurship education: A comparative study of the U.S. and Korea‖. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1(1), 27–43.
Lee, J. W., Daly, S. R., Huang-Saad, A., Rodriguez, G., & Seifert, C. M. (2020). Cognitive strategies in solution mapping: How engineering designers identify problems for technological solutions. Journal of Design Studies, 71(1), 1-33.
Lichtenthaler, U., & Lichtenthaler, E. (2009). A capability-based framework for open innovation: complementing absorptive capacity. Journal of Management Studies, 46(8), 1315-1338.
Lin, H. E., Edward, F., Yang, J., & Wang, C. (2016). Aligning Knowledge Assets for Exploitation, Exploration, and Ambidexterity: A Study of Companies in High-TechParks in China. Journal of Product Development & Management Association, 34(2),122-140.
Liu, Z., Feng, J., & Wang, J. (2020). Resource-Constrained Innovation Method for Sustainability: Application of Morphological Analysis and TRIZ Inventive Principles. Journal of Sustainability, 12(3), 1-23.
Lou, S. J., Chung, C. C., Dzan, W. Y., Tseng, K. H., & Shih, R. C. (2013). Effect of using TRIZ creative learning to build a pneumatic propeller ship while applying STEM knowledge. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(2), 365-379.
O’Reilly III, Ch. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future. Journal of Academy of Management Perspectives (in press), 27(4), 324-338.
Oxford Createvity (2022).40 Inventive Principles with Examples. 1-22. Available at: https://edu.lu.lv/pluginfile.php/74636/mod_resource/ content/1/__40_inventive_principles_with_examples.pdf
Packham, G., Jones, P., Miller, C., Pickernell, D., & Thomas, B. (2010). Attitudes towards entrepreneurship education: A comparative analysis. Journal of Education and Training, 52(8/9), 568–586.
Pardede, E. (2015). The use of modern pedagogical techniques when introducing information technology students to entrepreneurship. Journal of Teach Higher Education, 20(1), 636–651.
Peltonen, K. (2015). How can teachers’ entrepreneurial competences be developed? A collaborative learning perspective. Journal of Education Training, 57(5), 492-511.
Portuguez Castro, M., Ross Scheede, C., & Gomez Zermeno, M. (2019). The impact of higher education in entrepreneurship and the innovation ecosystem: A case study in Mexico. Journal of Sustainability, 20(1), 55-97.
Rahim, Z. A., & Iqbal, M. S. (2020). The Adoption of the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ) in The Malaysia Education Policy and Curriculum for STEM Subject. ASEAN Journal of Engineering Education, 4(2), 44-54.
Razib, Z. A., Yusof, S. M., Bakar, N. A., & Mohamad, W. M. S. W. (2019). The application of computational thinking and triz methodology in patent innovation analytics. In: 3rd International Conference of Reliable Information and Communication Technology, IRICT 2018, 23-24 June 2018, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Ramdan, M. R., Abd Aziz, N. A., Abdullah, N. L., Samsudin, N., Veer Singh, G. S., Zakaria, Th., Fuzi, N. M., & Yee Ong, Sh. Y. (2022). SMEs Performance in Malaysia: The Role of Contextual Ambidexterity in Innovation Culture and Performance. Journal of Sustainability, 14(3), 1-18.
Rao, I., & Thakur, P. (2019). Knowledge workers, organisational ambidexterity and sustainability: a conceptual framework. International Journal of Business Excellence, 19(3), 415–428.
Rodriguez-Pena, A. (2021). Assessing the impact of corporate entrepreneurship in the financial performance of subsidiaries of Colombian business groups: under environmental dynamism moderation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 10(16), 1-27.
Rosing, K., & Zacher, H. (2017). Individual ambidexterity: The duality of exploration and exploitation and its relationship with innovative performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(5), 694–709.
Santoro, G., Vrontis, D., Thrassou, A., & Dezi, L. (2018). The internet of things: building a knowledge management system for open innovation and knowledge management capacity. Journal of Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136(3), 347-354.
Secundo, G., Del Vecchio, P., Passiante, G. (2015). Creating innovative entrepreneurial mindsets as a lever for knowledge-based regional development. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 6(4), 276–298.
Swadi, A. F., & Al-dalaien, A. A. (2021). Impact of organizational entrepreneurship characteristics on entrepreneurial orientation: Moderating role of firm size and education. Journal of Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(3), 478-487.
van Lieshout, J. W. F. C., van der Velden, J. M., Blomme, R. J., & Peters, P. (2021). The interrelatedness of organizational ambidexterity, dynamic capabilities and open innovation: a conceptual model towards a competitive advantage. Journal of European Journal of Management
Studies, 26( 2/3), 39-62.
Wiley, J., & Sons, S. (2008). TRIZ: The Theory of Inventive Problem Solving. In book: The PDMA ToolBook 3 for New Product Development, 3-40.
_||_