Litigation and International Responsibility; Instruments deal with the lack of performing commitments concerning climate change

Subject Areas : environmental low

Seyed Abbas Pourhashemi ¹ , Sobhan Taiebi ² , Shima Naderi ³

1 - Assistant Professor, Department of Environment and Energy, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2 - PhD Student in Environmental Law, Department of Environment and Energy, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 - MS.c in International Law, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Received: 2014-06-02 Accepted : 2015-01-08 Published : 2015-02-20

Keywords: International Responsibility a, Climate Change, Pollutions, Environmental Litigation, International Environmental la,

Abstract :

Creating and articulating the human rights of the people is necessary. Therefore human rights in dealing with environmental problems, not indifferent and more serious issues in the light of environmental considerations within the international legal has institutionalized. One of the most important environmental problems of global climate change is caused by the violation of the international obligations of states.However, conventions, protocols and other international documents on climate change with emphasis on the prevention of air and water pollution seems not yet developed, developing and least developed in the implementation of these documents and regulations are in trouble and international agreements output is positive and strong. It is necessary to describe the purpose of the pathology of non-fulfillment of international commitments on climate change, examines the legal framework of the effective tools in this regard, be addressed. Therefore, its Necessitated, Be investigated to Investigating violation of international obligations on climate change.

References:

1. Nicolas Sadalvor, 2003, Access to Justice in International Matters, (Berlin: Institute for Applied Ecology,. P 16.


2. امیر ارجمند، ا.، آموزش حقوق بشر، مجله تحقیقات حقوقی، شماره 25-26، ص 35،1387.
   
   
   1. Guerra and Others v. Italy (1998) 26 EHRR 357.
   
   
   2. BladetTromso and Stensaasv,2000,. Norway  29 EHRR 125.
   
   
   3. Richard Rohbinder, Democracy, Access  toJustic and Environment at the International Law (university, of Frankfurt, 2002), p.20.
   
   
   4. افتخار جهرمی، گ.، ، حق بر محیط زیست با تاکید بر حق دسترسی به اطلاعات زیست محیطی، همایش حقوق محیط زیست در ایران، ص 52.سال1382.
   
   
   5. تن برگ، دیودونیه، مدیریت بحران، مترجم محمد علی ذوالفقاری اصل،  نشر وحدت، بخش چهارم.1374.
      
      
      1. Rainbow Warrior, 1990, (New Zealand/France), R.I.A.A, vol.XX,p. 217,at pp. 265-266.
      
      
      2. دلماس مارتی، می ری، جهانی شدن حقوق:فرصت ها و خطرات، ترجمه اردشیر امیرارجمند، 1378مجله حقوقی شماره24 صفحه348
      
      
      3. شلتون،دینا، تشریفات و آیین دادرسی حقوق بین الملل محیط زیست در حقوق محیط زیست ، ترجمه محمدحسن حبیبی، انتشارات دانشگاه تهران، صفحه 319 سال1381.
         
         
         1. MalcomD.Evans, 2001, International Law Documents, (London, Blackstone Press), PP. 210-200.
         
         
         2. زمانی، ق.، 1381، توسعه ی مسئولیت بین المللی در پرتو حقوق بین الملل محیط زیست، مجله پژوهش های حقوقی، سال اول، شماره ی ١، صص 29-28.
         
         
         3. 13.فکری راد، م.، ، مسئولیت بین المللی دولت ها در قبال خسارات فرامرزی ناشی از فعالیت های خطرناک، پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه تهران، 1388.
            
            
            1. I.C.J Rep1970. P. 32
            
            
            2. M.Bos, 1984, A Methodology of International Law p. 66-65.
            
            
            3. Rosencranz, Westone,. 1984, Transboundary Air Pollution: The Search for an International Response, in 8Harv. Envtl. L. Rev, p.89.
            
            
            4. Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project, 1997, (Hungary/Slovakia), judgment, ICJ Report, p7, paras. 46-48.
            
            
            5. Barboza, j., 1994, International Liability for Injurious Consequences of Acts Non Prohibited by International law and Protection of the Environment, Recueil des cours, vol 247, pp 358.
            
            
            6. Fitzmaurice, m., 1999 – 2000, International Liability for Injurious Consequences of Acts Non Prohibited by International law, Polish yearbook of international law, pp 61.
            
            
            7. Kiss, A., and Shelton, D., 2007, Strict Liability in Environmental law, The George Washington University law, p 7. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1010478
            
            
            8. OKeefe, c., 1990, Transboundary Pollution and the Strict Liability Issue: The Work of the ILC on the Topic”, Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, vol 18, p 167.
            
            
            9. The 1991 United Nations Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context (ESPOO, Finland) 25, February, 1991. Available at http: unece. Org/env/eia/eia-htm.