The Impact of Deviations from Industry Resource Allocation Strategies on Investment Inefficiency Considering the Moderating Role of Corporate Governance, Market Competition, and Information Asymmetry
Subject Areas : Financial engineering
Yones Amjadian
1
,
Seyyed Abbas Borhani
2
*
1 - Department of Accounting, Qom branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran
2 -
Keywords: deviations from industry resource allocation strategies, investment inefficiency, corporate governance, product market competition, information asymmetry.,
Abstract :
This study aims to examine the impact of deviations from industry resource allocation strategies on investment inefficiency and to provide solutions for reducing these inefficiencies. The research utilizes quantitative data from companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange between the years 2015 to 2022. The sample consists of 129 companies over a period of 8 years. Data analysis was performed using EViews and Excel software. Independent variables include deviations from industry resource allocation strategies (STRAT_DEV), while the dependent variable is investment inefficiency (INV). The findings revealed that deviations from industry resource allocation strategies lead to increased investment inefficiency. Strong corporate governance can mitigate the negative effects of these deviations, whereas market competition has no significant impact. Additionally, reducing information asymmetry can decrease the positive relationship between deviations from resource allocation strategies and investment inefficiency. The results highlight the importance of industry-aligned strategies and effective oversight in improving investment efficiency. Strong corporate governance and reduced information asymmetry can mitigate the negative impacts of deviations from resource allocation strategies, aiding in better investment decision-making and enhancing corporate value.
1) ثقفی، علی و عربمازار یزدی، مصطفی. (1389)، کیفیت گزارشگری مالی و ناکارایی سرمایهگذاری، نشریه پژوهشهای حسابداری مالی، سال 2، شماره 4، صص1-20.
2) جعفری دستجردی، سمانه. (1392)، تحلیلی بر تأثیر کیفیت سود بر عدم تقارن اطلاعاتی بانکها و مؤسسات اعتباری پذیرفتهشده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران، نخستین کنفرانس ملی توسعه مدیریت پولی و بانکی، تهران، https://civilica.com/doc/236908/.
3) خدامی پور، احمد و بزرایی، یونس. (1394)، تأثیر رقابت بازار محصول بر اجتناب از پرداخت مالیات شرکتهای پذیرفتهشده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران، پژوهشنامه مالیات، سال 23، شماره 27، صص 211-227.
4) Abdoh, H., & Varela, O. (2017). Product market competition, idiosyncratic and systematic volatility. Journal of Corporate Finance, 43, 500-513.
5) Biddle, G. C., Hilary, G., & Verdi, R. S. (2009). How does financial reporting quality relate to investment efficiency? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 48(2-3), 112-131.
6) Carpenter, M. A. (2000). The price of change: The role of CEO compensation in strategic variation and deviation from industry strategy norms. Journal of Management, 26(6), 1179-1198.
7) Chen, S., Wang, K., & Li, X. (2012). Product market competition, ultimate controlling structure and related party transactions. China Journal of Accounting Research, 5, 293-306.
8) Chen, T., Xie, L., & Zhang, Y. (2017). How does analysts' forecast quality relate to corporate investment efficiency? Journal of Corporate Finance, 43, 217-240.
9) Deephouse, D. L. (1999). To be different, or to be the same? It’s a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 147-166.
10) Ferreira, M. A., & Matos, P. (2008). The colors of investors’ money: The role of institutional investors around the world. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(3), 499-533.
11) Griffith, S. J. (2015). Corporate governance in an era of compliance. Wm. & Mary L. Rev., 57, 2075.
12) Habib, A., & Hasan, M. M. (2021). Business strategy and labor investment efficiency. International Review of Finance, 21(1), 58-96.
13) Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76, 323-329.
14) Kang, Y. J., Lee, H. Y., Park, H. Y., & Park, J. H. (2022). Social ties, managerial overconfidence, and investment efficiency. Finance Research Letters, 46, 102300.
15) Lin, Y. E., Li, Y. W., Cheng, T. Y., & Lam, K. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and investment efficiency: Does business strategy matter? International Review of Financial Analysis, 73, 101585.
16) Litov, L. P., Moreton, P., & Zenger, T. R. (2012). Corporate strategy, analyst coverage, and the uniqueness paradox. Management Science, 58(10), 1797-1815.
17) Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance, and the theory of investment. The American Economic Review, 48(3), 261-297.
18) Navissi, F., Sridharan, V. G., Khedmati, M., Lim, E. K., & Evdokimov, E. (2017). Business strategy, over-(under-) investment, and managerial compensation. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 29(2), 63-86.
19) Provaty, S. S., Amin, S., & Hasan, M. M. (2022). Strategic deviation and debt maturity structure. Finance Research Letters, 50, 103317.
20) Rajkovic, T. (2020). Lead independent directors and investment efficiency. Journal of Corporate Finance, 64, 101690.
21) Ranasinghe, D., & Habib, A. (2023). Strategic deviation and investment inefficiency. Australian Journal of Management, 03128962231152764.
22) Schmidt, K. M. (1997). Managerial incentives and product market competition. The Review of Economic Studies, 64(2), 191-213.
23) Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737-783.
24) Stoughton, N. M., Wong, K. P., & Yi, L. (2017). Investment efficiency and product market competition. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52(6), 2611-2642.
25) Tang, J., Crossan, M., & Rowe, W. G. (2011). Dominant CEO, deviant strategy, and extreme performance: The moderating role of a powerful board. Journal of Management Studies, 48(7), 1479-1503.
26) Ye, Z., Shahab, Y., Riaz, Y., & Ntim, C. G. (2023). Strategic deviation and the cost of debt financing. Economic Modelling, 125, 106371.
27) Yermack, D. (2017). Corporate governance and blockchains. Review of Finance, 21(1), 7-31