Investigating the Relationship between Trade and Financial Openness with Ecological Footprint

Subject Areas : Labor and Demographic Economics

Hossein-Ali  Fakher ¹ (Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran)
Zahra  Abedi ² (Department of Environmental Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran)
Bita  Shaygani ³ (Department of Economics, Shahriar Branch, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran)

Received: 2018-03-13 Accepted : 2018-03-13 Published : 2018-02-20

Keywords: Q56, Trade openness, Financial Openness, JEL Classification: C33, Q57. Keywords: Ecological Footprint, Simultaneous Equations System,

Abstract :

The major aim of this paper is the survey of impact of trade and financial openness on ecological footprint in selected developing countries. In this paper, it has been tried to test the effect of trade and financial openness on ecological footprint in the form of simultaneous-equation system on the base of panel data to the years from 1994 to 2014. The results show, there are several factors, which can affect the trade and financial openness and cannot be considered as exogenous variables. Considering trade and financial openness as endogenous variables and the factors influencing them, the impact of such variables on the ecological footprint index can be examined more precisely. On this basis, trade openness has positive and significant effect on ecological footprint index (negative effect on environment quality). On the other hand, according to shelter of pollution hypothesis financial openness variable has positive and significant effect on the ecological footprint index.

References:

منابع

-      ترابی، تقی، خواجوی­پور، امین، طریقی، سمانه، پهلوان، محمدرضا (1394). تاثیر مصرف انرژی، رشد اقتصادی و تجارت خارجی بر انتشار گازهای گلخانه‌ای در ایران. فصلنامه مدلسازی اقتصادی، 9 (29): 63-84.

-      جعفری صمیمی، احمد، احمدپور، سید محی­الدین (1395). بررسی رابطه شاخص عملکرد محیط‌زیست و رشد اقتصادی در کشورهای توسعه یافته. پژوهشنامه اقتصاد انرژی ایران، 1(1): 55-72.

-      صادقی، سیدکمال، متفکر آزاد، محمدعلی، پورعبادالهان کویچ، محسن،شهباززاده خیاوی، اتابک(1391). بررسی رابطه علی بین انتشار دی­اکسیدکربن، سرمایه­گذاری مستقیم خارجی، سرانه مصرف انرژی و تولید ناخالص داخلی در ایران. فصلنامه اقتصاد محیط‌زیست و انرژی، 3(4): 101-116.

-      فطرس، محمدحسین، معبودی، رضا (1389). رابطه علی مصرف انرژی، جمعیت شهرنشین و آلودگی محیط‌زیست در ایران 1385-1350. مطالعات اقتصاد انرژی، 7(27): 1-17.

-      لشکری­زاده، مریم، تاجداران، سیده نوتا (1387). تجزیه و تحلیل تئوریکی منحنی زیست­محیطی کوزنتس. مدلسازی اقتصادی، 2(2): 131-149.

-      مولایی، مرتضی، بشارت، احسان (1394). بررسی ارتباط بین تولید ناخالص داخلی و ردپای اکولوژیکی به عنوان شاخص تخریب محیط‌زیست. فصلنامه تحقیقات اقتصادی، 50(4): 1017-1033.

-        Arouri, A., Youssef, B., & Mhenni, H. (2012). Energy consumption, Economic Growth and CO2 Emission Middle East and North African Countries. Energy Policy, 45: 126-135.

-        Abou-Ali, H., & Abdelfattah, Y.M. (2013). Integrated paradigm for sustainable development: a panel data study. Economic Modelling, 30: 334-342.

-        Copeland, B.R., & Taylor, M.S. (2003). Trade and the Environment. Princeton University Press.

-        Grossman, G., & Krueger, A.B. (1991). Environmental impact of a North American free trade agreement.Cambridge, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper.

-         Fakher, H.A., & Abedi, Z. (2017). Relationship between environmental quality and economic growth in developing countries (based on Environmental Performance Index). Environmental Energy and Economic Research, (1)3: 300-310.

-        Hau, H. (2000). Real exchange rate volatility and economic openness: theory and evidence. Central economic policy research, discussion paper, No. 2356:1-21.

-        Hsu, C.C.,Wu, J.Y., & Yau, R. (2011). Foreign direct investment and business cycle co-movements: the panel data evidence. Journal of Macroeconomics, 33: 770-783.

-        Kulionis, V. (2013). The relationship between renewable energy consumption, CO2 emission and economic growth in Denmark. University essay Fromlunds Universitet /Economisk Historiska institutionen.

-        Liberati, P. (2006). Trade openness, financial openness and government size.Università di Urbino “Carlo Bo”, Revised Edition ISE.

-        Nijkamp, P., Rossi, E., & Vindigni, G. (2004). Ecological Footprints in Plural: A MetaAnalytic Comparison of Empirical Results. Regional Studies, 38: 747-765.

-        Ozturk, I., & Acaravci, A.(2013). The long-run and causal analysis of energy, growth, openness and financial development on carbon emissions in Turkey. Energy Economics, 36: 262–267.

-        Rees, W.E. (2006). Ecological Footprints and Bio-Capacity: Essential Elements in Sustainability Assessment, Chapter 9 in Jo Dewulf and Herman VanLangenhove   (eds.), Renewables-Based Technology: Sustainability Assessment, pp.143-158, Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.

-        Shahbaz, M., Nasreen, S., &Afza, T.(2013a). Environmental consequences of economic growth and foreign direct investment: evidence from panel data analysis. Energy Econ, 2: 14–27.

-        Shahbaz, M., Hye, Q.M.A., Tiwari, A.K., & Leitao, N.C. (2013b). Economic Growth, Energy Consumption, Financial Development, International Trade and CO2 Emissions in Indonesia. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 25: 109-121.

-        Stern, D. (2005). The Environment Kuznets Curve, Departman of Economics. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180, USA.

-        Tamazian, A., & Rao, B. (2010). Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental degradation? evidence from transitional economies. Journal of Energy Economics, 32(1):137-145.

-        Wiedmann, T., Minx, J., Barret, J., & Wackernagel, M. (2006). Allocating ecological footprints to final consumption categories with input output analysis. Ecological Economics, 56: 28-48.