The Effect of Prices Changes on Income and Welfare Distribution in Urban Areas
Subject Areas : Labor and Demographic Economics
teymoor
mohammadi
1
(دانشیار دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی)
Abbas
Shakeri
2
(استاد اقتصاد دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی)
Mahnoosh
Abdollah milani
3
(استادیار اقتصاد دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی)
Ali
Shahabi
4
(دانشجوی دکتری)
Keywords: Inflation, Social Welfare, D63, JEL Classification: D31, E31 Keywords: Income Distribution, Atkinson Inequality Measure,
Abstract :
Abstract The purpose of this paper is to study the effect of price changes on the distribution of income and social welfare in Iranian urban areas during 1991-2011. To get the end, a linear expenditure system is estimated by the use of budget data in urban households to obtain the Engel coefficients for 12 good groups estimating seemingly unrelated regressions. Equivalent Income Index is calculated for 10 cost deciles based on what Atkinson’s inequality measure and social welfare index is calculated. The results represent that income inequality of urban households has been increased during the periods of high inflation, while social welfare has experienced a decreased growth. Meanwhile, it is clear that a remarkable part of social welfare changes is aroused by the changes of household's private welfare.
منابع
- ابونوری، اسمعیل(1376). اثر شاخص‌های کلان بر توزیع درآمد در ایران. مجله تحقیقات اقتصادی، (51): 31-1.
- ابونوری، اسمعیل، تاجدین، علی(1383). برآورد اثر تورم بر نابرابری در توزیع هزینه در ایران با استفاده از روش ناپارامتریکی(1380-1350). مجله تحقیقات اقتصادی، (65): 184-165.
- عبادی جعفر، سایرین(1391). تغییرات رفاه اجتماعی در ایران(رهیافت پارتویی و غیرپارتویی از تابع کاردینال رفاه اجتماعی. سیاست‌های اقتصادی(نامه مفید)، 8(18): 24-3.
- کفایی، سید محمدعلی، نصیری، حسین(1389). معرفی و برآورد دو شاخص جدید نابرابری توزیع درآمد برای ایران: جینی تک پارامتری و اتکینسون- جینی. پژوهشنامه اقتصادی10 (4):105-138.
- Antony B. A. (1970). On the measurement of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory, 2: 244-263.
- Antony B. A. (1999). The contribution of Amartya Sen to welfare economics. Scand. J. of Economics 101(2): 173-190.
- David M. N. (1995). The distributional impact of price changes in hungary and the united kingdom. The Economic Journal, 105: 847-863.
- Abounoori, E., & McCloughan, P. (2003). A simple way to calculate the gini coefficient for grouped as well as ungrouped data. Applied Economics Letters, 10: 505-509.
- Hyun H. S. & Nanak Kakwani (2006). Measuring the impact of prices on inequality: With Applications to Thailand and Korea. Journal of Economic Inequality 4: 181-207.
- Loughrey, J., & Cathal O'Donoghue (2012). The impact of price changes on household welfare and inequality1999-2011. The Economic and Social Review, 43, (1): 31-66.
- Jianwu He & Shantong Li. (2010). Predicting expenditure patterns across provinces in china based on aidads demand system. Development Research Center, the State Council of China, First Draft, Prepared for Thirteenth Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis
- John A. L. Cranfield et al. (2000). On the estimation of an implicitly additive demand system. Applied Economics, 32:1907-1915.
- Creedy, J., & van de Ven, J. (1997). The distributional effects of inflation in Australia 1980- 1995. The Australian Economic Review, 30(2):125-43.
- Creedy, J., & Sleeman, C. (2006). Analysis carbon taxation, prices and welfare in New Zealand. Ecological Economics 57 , pp333– 345
- Creedy, J. (2014). Interpreting inequality measures and changes in inequality. Working Paper 11/2014
- Muellbauer, J. (1974). Inequality measures, prices and household composition. Review of Economic Studies.
- Rimmer, M. T., & Powell, A. A. (1996). An implicitly additive demand system. Applied Economics, 28: 1613- 1622.
- King, M. A. (1981). Welfare analysis of tax reforms using household data. NBER technical working paper series. No.16.
- Pollak, R. A., & Wales T.J. (1992).Demand system specification & estimation. New York Oxford University Press.