The impact of dimensions of emotional intelligence and financial intelligence on the dimensions of auditor’s performance with the focal correlation coefficient approach

Subject Areas : Financial Economics

امیر رحیمی آشتیانی ¹ (گروه حسابداری ، واحد تنکابن ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، تنکابن ، ایران)
مهران آقایی ² (گروه حسابداری ، واحد آشتیان ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، آشتیان ، ایران)
مهناز عسکریان ³ (گروه حسابداری، واحد آشتیان ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، آشتیان ، ایران)
محمود صمدی لرگانی ⁴ (گروه حسابداری ، واحد تنکابن ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، تنکابن ، ایران)

Received: 2021-04-14 Accepted : 2021-06-18 Published : 2021-08-23

Keywords: G11, M42, JEL Classification: B10,

Abstract :

This research has been conducted with the purpose of investigating the effect of dimensions of emotional intelligence and financial intelligence on the dimensions of auditor’s performance with the focal correlation coefficient approach. This study is applicable in terms of objective and concerning data collection method is descriptive correlational. The statistical population of this study is auditors working in all auditing firms that are members of the Society of Certified Public Accountants operating in Tehran. 250 subjects were selected employing cluster random sampling method. Data collection tools were standard questionnaires. Content validity and the results of the measurement model were cited to evaluate the validity and reliability of the measurement tools. To analyze the data, focal correlation coefficient using SPSS software was employed. The results of the hypothesis test indicated that: the first, second and third focal correlation coefficients were reported to be significant at the 99% confidence level, which shows the existence of three sets of dependent variables. The focal correlation function the significance of the three functions extracted at the 99% confidence level. Each focal variable has a coefficient of determination and the first focal correlation is more important than the other correlations. The first focal correlation with a coefficient of determination of 0.945 has been able to explain 94% of the variance. The total coefficient of determination shows the amount of changes. This value is equal to 0.980, which indicates that the dimensions of emotional intelligence and financial intelligence are explained by 0.98% by the dimensions of the auditor’s performance. The most common criterion for testing the significance level of the first focal correlation is the Wilks’ statistic criterion, which according to the obtained significance level (0.000), it is indicated that the three sets of variables are related to each other.

References:

• رستمی مازویی، نعمت و صالحی مریدانی، سکینه (1398)، تأثیر هوش هیجانی بر قضاوت حسابرس، سومین کنفرانس ملی مطالعات نوین مدیریت و حسابداری در ایران


• حاجیها،زهره ، ملاسلطانی ، جمال (1397)، بررسی رابطه هوش عاطفی و هوش تحلیلی با عملکرد حسابرس ،فصلنامه حسابداری مدیریت –سال نهم –شماره 28 –ص 39-52


• بنی مهد، بهمن و معافی،، رضا. (1392). کیفیت اقلام تعهدی و انتخاب حسابرس، فصلنامه مطالعات تجربی حسابداری مالی ـ سال یازدهم ـ شماره 37 ، صص 19 ـ 25


• صالحی، اله کرم؛ قیصری، طاهر و تامرادی، علی (1397). بررسی تأثیر هوش هیجانی بر عملکرد حسابرس با نقش واسط سرمایه فکری، چشم انداز حسابداری و مدیریت، 1 (4)، 60-71.


• مشایخی، سمیه، اسکندری، حسین، (1396)، بررسی تأثیر رفتار شهروندی سازمانی و هوش هیجانی بر رضایت شغلی


• سیداحمدی، محمد، کوشان ،محسن (1390)، رابطه هوش هیجانی و سبک رهبری، مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی و خدمات بهداشتی درمانی سبزوار، شماره 1، 54-47


• دلاور، علی، (1385)، روش تحقیق در روان شناسی و علوم تربیتی، نشر ویرایش.


• Ahmed, A, S., Neel, M. J. and Wang, D. (2010).” Does Mandatory Adoption of IFRS improve Accounting Quality? Preliminary Evidence”, Working Paper, retrieved at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1502909


• Banimahd,B.Vafaei,E (2012), the effect of client size , audit report , state ownership ,financial  leverage  and  profitability  on  auditor  selection; evidence from Iran, African Journal of Business Management. Vol 6, no 3, pp 4100-4105.


• Berger, P. & Hann, R. (2007).Segment profitability and the proprietary and agency costs of disclosure’. The Accounting Review, Vol. 82, No. 4, pp. 869–906.


• Chen, W., & Wang, H. (2002). Discretionary accruals, audit firm tenure and audit-partner tenure: Empirical evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economic, 1 (1), 24-92.


• Guedhami, O. , Pittman, J.A and W. Saffar (2009). Auditor Choice in Privatized Firms: Empirical Evidence on the Role of State and Foreign Owners, Journal of Accounting & Economics, vol. 48, pp. 151-171.


• Goleman, D (1998). Emotionl Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More.


• li, Jun& liu, Ming. (2009). “The impact of corporate governance on auditor choice evidence from china”, Journal of international accounting, auditing and taxation, 18, 23-59.


• Lin, Z. J.; and M. Liu. (2009), The Impact of Corporate Governance on Auditor Choice: Evidence from China. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation. pp. 44-59.


• Zhang T, Bin S, Zhang H (2010). Political Connection, Transparency and Auditor Choice: Evidence from Family-Owned Firms in China. 4th Symp. China J. Account. Res., pp.17-18.


• Zureigat, Q. M. (2011). The Effect of Ownership Structure on Audit Quality: Evidence from Jordan."International Journal of Business and Social Science, Vol.2, pp.38-46.


• Hanafi, R, (2010), “Spiritual Intelligence”, Emotional Intelligence and Auditor’s Performance. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, 14(1), PP.29–40.


• Langhorn, S, (2004), “How Emotional Intelligence can Improve Management Performance”, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 16(4), PP.220–230


• Yang, L, (2013), “The Impact of Emotional Intelligence on Auditor Judgment. Dissertation Doctor of Philosophy”, URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10156/4375.

 

 

یادداشت‌ها