Examining development models of underdeveloped areas with emphasis on global experiences
Subject Areas : Housing planningAli Mohammad Ebrahimi 1 , Parviz Aghaei 2 *
1 - PhD in Economic Sociology and Development, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2 - PhD in Geography and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
Keywords: marginalization, worn texture, stagnant areas, development, regeneration,
Abstract :
In the third millennium, the challenges related to the areas left behind from development have become one of the urban crises, which finding a solution to organize and solve it is on the agenda of urban, regional and national policy and management. America, China, and the socialist countries of Europe are among the leading societies in this field, whose many programs have attracted the attention of many thinkers. These countries have put a wide range of programs on the agenda, especially after the Second World War, on this basis, this research is going to be analyzed with a descriptive analytical method and in a library form and with the understanding of the importance of this issue and the increasing urban challenges in Iran. And the review of these programs is to, on the one hand, bring about the scientific richness of these topics inside the country, and on the other hand, to extract their executive structure. The results of the research, which is based on nine executive programs, show that the initiatives of the public sector (and especially local governments) and the use of the talents of the private sector are among the main factors in the regeneration of the areas that have not been developed, with an emphasis on the marginal, stagnant and The texture is worn and in all upgrade models; Development from the top (public and private sector and non-profit organizations) and development from the bottom (local residents) have occurred. And even participatory approaches based on the capacity of local communities are less considered.
1. ابراهیمی، علی¬محمد (1399)، تجریه برنامه ارتقای زاغه¬ها در کشورهای منتخب، انتشارات دانشگاه جامع امام حسین (ع)، تهران.
2. ابراهیمی، علی¬محمد؛ آقایی، پرویز (1400)، ارائه بسته نهادی-مقرراتی جهت حل مساله مناطق بازمانده از توسعه در کلانشهرهای ایران (با تأکید بر مزیت اقتصادی)؛ اندیشکده پایا؛ دانشگاه جامع امام حسین (ع).
3. احدنژاد، م.، و علی پور، س. (1392). بررسی روند مداخله در مناطق اسکان غیررسمی با تاکید بر سیاست تخریب و پاک سازی (نمونه موردی: اسلام آباد کرج, 1391-1374). پژوهش و برنامه ریزی شهری, 4(14), 21-40.
4. داداش پور، هاشم.، و تقوایی، علی اکبر.، و قانع، نرگس. (1393). بررسی ظرفیت توسعه میان افزا در فضاهای موقوفه شهری؛ مطالعه موردی: ناحیه 3 منطقه 2 شهر یزد. مطالعات شهر ایرانی اسلامی, -(15), 63-78.
5. دولتی چناری، متین. (1396). طراحي مسكن ارزان قيمت در مقياس زيرمحل (با رويكرد ارتقاي كيفيت در بخشي از محله كارگري حاشيه شهر رشت)، پایان¬نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی تهران.
6. فتاحی، سارا. (1389). بررسي و ارزيابي روش ها و سياست هاي تامين مسكن اقشار كم درآمد (نمونه موردي: شهر جديد پرند)، پایان¬نامه كارشناسي ارشد، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنر اصفهان.
7. مرکز مطالعات برنامه¬ریزی شهر تهران (1395)، شناسایي اصول و راهکارهای اجرایی توسعه میان¬افزا در شهر تهران به عنوان یکی از ابعاد توسعه شهری پایدار، تهران
8. موحد، علی.، و احمدی، مظهر. (1397). برنامه ریزی بازتوسعه اراضی متروکه شهری منطقه 19 تهران با تأکید بر رویکرد توسعه میان افزا. برنامه ریزی و توسعه کالبدی, 3(1 (پیاپی 9) ), 58-75.
9. Abunyewah, M., Gajendran, T., & Maund, K. (2018). Profiling Informal Settlements for Disaster Risks. Procedia Engineering, 212, 238–245. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.031
10. Apgar, W, Donovan, Sh. (1999). Beyond Housing: The Comprehensive Community Revitalization Program in the South Bronx, Published by:John F Kennedy School of Government
11. Atkinson, Rowland. (2010). “The Evidence of the Impact of Gentrification: New Lessons for the Urban Renaissance”. Routledge. London.
12. Banda, E. M., & Mwale, F. D. (2018). Utility performance in supplying water to informal settlements: A case study from Malawi. Utilities Policy, 55, 151–157. doi:10.1016/j.jup.2018.09.009
13. Ezme, Albeniz, T. (2009). “The Relationship Poverty-Everyday Life and a Reading of Sulukule Sample via Photographs”. Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University. Istanbul. Turkey.
14. Gevaert, C. M., Persello, C., Sliuzas, R., & Vosselman, G. (2017). Informal settlement classification using point-cloud and image-based features from UAV data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 125, 225–236. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.01.017
15. https://denverinfill.com/2020/01/a-decade-of-infill-before-and-after.html
16. https://files.hudexchange.info/resources/documents/VacantPropertiesTrueCosttoCommunities.pdf
17. https://www.caixinglobal.com/2019-01-29/local-governments-downsize-slum-renovations-amid-debt-property-price-worries-101375823.html
18. Maryland Department of Planning (2001). Models and Guidelines for Infill Development, Managing Maryland’s Growth.
19. Mehanna, Walaa Abou El-Haggag; Mehanna, Wesam Abou El-Haggag (2019). Urban renewal for traditional commercial streets at the historical centers of cities. Alexandria Engineering Journal, (), S1110016819301012–. doi:10.1016/j.aej.2019.09.015
20. Nassar, D. M., & Elsayed, H. G. (2017). From Informal Settlements to sustainable communities. Alexandria Engineering Journal. doi:10.1016/j.aej.2017.09.004
21. Pagano, Michael A. and Ann O’M Bowman. (2000). “Vacant Land in Cities: An Urban Resource.” Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Center On Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
22. Park, H., Fan, P., John, R., Ouyang, Z., & Chen, J. (2019). Spatiotemporal changes of informal settlements: Ger districts in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. Landscape and Urban Planning, 191, 103630. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103630
23. Saharan, T., Pfeffer, K., Baud, I., & Scott, D. (2019). Comparing governance and bargaining of livelihoods in informal settlements in Chennai and eThekwini. Cities. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.02.017
24. UN- Habitat (2003), "The challenge of slums: local report of human setelments", London; earth scam publication.