Analyzing the opposition of Tariqat and Sharia in the critical discourse of Asrar al-Tawheed Abu Said based on Norman Farklough's "explanation" theory, relying on the hegemony of power and dignity.
Subject Areas : Interpretive (with literary and artistic features)
shahram sariaslani
1
,
Siyavash Moradi
2
,
mir jalaleddin kazzazi
3
1 - 1. ph.D.student of Persian Lankguage and Literature,Islamic Azad university, Hamedan- iran.
2 - PhD Candidate of Persian Language and Literature, Islamic Azad University, Arak Branch
3 - Full Professor of Persian Lankguage and Literature, Department, Allameh Tabatabai, Tehran-Iran.
Keywords: Asrar al-Uto Haid, critical discourse analysis, Sharia and Tariqat, Norman Fairclough, hegemony of power.,
Abstract :
Since the method of discourse analysis of historical and literary texts can lead to the identification of the work, therefore, this category can be the result of the emergence of post-structuralist and post-modern theories in the 60s and 70s in the criticism of disorders and He knew the unhappiness of modern man. Critical discourse analysis is the relationship between language, power and ideology. Farklaf has also researched and composed it in three levels "description, interpretation, explanation". Abu Saeed in Bad and his arrival in Neyshabur creates enmity and confrontation between the Shariatians. At that time, there were three important centers of power, which were: 1. The government (the official power and rulers of Ghazni), 2. The famous jurists of the age (Ahlul Shariat), 3. Sufis or elders (Ahlul Tariqat). Each of these three great powers tried to show their power in confrontation with the other, and in the end, Abu Saeed overcomes the two main centers of power with the power of words arising from ideology and dignity. In summarizing the level of his "explanation", Farklaf raises three questions: "social factors, ideology and influences", which is the basis of this research, the researcher tries to understand the language, power and ideology of Abu Saeed. researched at the level of "explanation" of Farklaf in the confrontation between Sharia and Tariqat. This research has been done in a descriptive-analytical and library method in a qualitative way