A comparative study of semantic deviance in romantic masnavis of Amir Khosro Dehlavi and Nezami Ganjavi

Subject Areas : Contemporary Literature Studies

nahid khazraei alizadeh ¹ , jalil moshidi ² , zahra ghorghi ³

1 -
2 - أستاذ قسم اللغة الفارسية وآدابها فرع أراك، أراك، إيران
3 - Assistant Professor, Department of Persian Language and Literature, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Received: 2024-06-26 Accepted : 2024-07-03 Published : 2024-10-09

Keywords: Semantic deviance, Amir Khosro Dehlavi, military, Iraqi style, Indian style,

Abstract :

Norm avoidance is one of the topics of discussion in the field of rhetorical sciences, which is actually a kind of escape from the normal norm of speech, and this escape from the logic of speech causes creation of beauty and defamiliarization. When the poet departs from the normal form of language, he resorts to techniques that are in the field of semantic deviation, such as: simile, metaphor, irony, permission, diagnosis, paradox, and good explanation. These spiritual crafts exist in the court of many great poets of Persian literature, including Nizami (poet of Iraqi style) and Amir Khosrow Dehlavi (poet of Indian style). We know Amir Khosro Dehlavi, one of the famous Persian literature of the Indian subcontinent, as one of the best military imitators of Ganjavi. In this research, based on the descriptive-analytical method, the comparison of two romantic masnavas by Nizami, named "Laili and Majnoon" and "Sweet Khosrow" with "Majonun and Laili" and "Shirin and Khosrow" by Amir Khosro Dehlavi. Also, several cases of literary arts in the romantic poems of these two poets have been examined. The main purpose of this research is to clarify the methods and techniques of semantic avoidance in the romantic masnavis of these two poets and its effect on the charm and depth of their poems. The results of the research show that both poets have been able to increase the semantic and aesthetic richness of their poems by using semantic norm avoidance, but their methods have differences in this field.

References:

1. اشرفی، امیراحمد (1362) خمسه امیرخسرو دهلوی، تهران، شقایق
2. ثروتیان، بهروز (1369) بیان در شعر فارسی تهران، برگ
3. دهلوی، امیرخسرو (1392) دیوان، تهران: قطره.
4. راستگو، محمد ( ۱۳۸۲)، هنر سخن‌آرایی، تهران : سمت.
5. سلدن، رامان (1372)، راهنماي نظرية ادبي معاصر، ترجمة عبّاس مخبر، تهران : نشر طرح نو.
6. شفیعی کدکنی، محمدرضا ( 1366)، صور خيال در شعر فارسي، تهران: آگاه.
7. صفا، ذبیح¬الله (1362) تاریخ ادبیات ایران، تهران، رامین
8. صفوی، کورش (1380)، از زبان شناسی به ادبیات، جلد اول، تهران: حوزه هنری.
9. صهبا، فروغ ( 1384)، «مبانی زیبایی شناسی شعر». مجله علوم اجتماعی و انسانی دانشگاه شیراز شماره 22 ص 109-90 .
10. محبتی، مهدی (1380) بدیع نو، تهران، سخن
11. نظامی گنجوی، الیاس بن یوسف (1389) لیلی و مجنون، تهران: قطره.
12. ــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ (1395) خسرو و شیرین، تهران: قطره.
13. نوروزی، خورشید (۱۳۸۶) نقد و تحلیل شرحهای لیلی و مجنون نظامی گنجه ای، مجله زبان و ادبیات فارسی، سال سوم، شماره هفتم.