Applications of Prayer in Arabic and Persian Based on Del Haymes Model (Case Study: Fictional Texts)

Subject Areas : شعر

maleka ahmadi qandak ¹ , fereshteh afzali ^{2 *}

1 - Master's degree in Arabic translation from Damghan University, Iran.
2 - /Assistant Professor, Department of Arabic Translation, Faculty of Humanities, Damghan University, Iran.

Received: 2024-02-07 Accepted : 2024-11-11 Published : 2025-03-10

Keywords: Cultural Differences, Spoken Prayer Action, Del Hymes, Arabic Stories.,

Abstract :

This descriptive-analytical study seeks to study the practice of prayer speech and its practical differences in Arabic and its Persian translation. For this purpose, in order to study these actions and discourses in fictional texts and in order to collect data, we randomly selected three collections of the noble works of »Naguib Mahfouz« the famous Egyptian author: Shahr o al-Asal, Thaht o almezalla and Beit Sayye alsoma a. then we explored parts of the prayer using the eight-frame framework proposed by Del Himes (1976) (SPEAKING) and provided a suitable translation in the target language. Findings show that the amount and frequency of prayer words and utterances in different situations according to different circumstances are different among Persian and Arabic speakers. Because some words containing prayer in the source language have a completely different meaning from the target language. According to the analysis of all the analyzed data, the act of praying in the stories of Shahr-o-Alasal is 22, Taht o almezalla, 9, and Bait Sayye a-Soma'a is 11. Considering the findings obtained in these three collections, the highest frequencies belong to the story collection of Shahr al-Asal, Bitsiya al-Sama'ah, and al-Mutzalah, respectively. On the other hand, the uses of prayer speech in these three sets of stories are: Asking God, asking for forgiveness, asking for forgiveness, asking for good, eliminating danger, wishing health and longevity, sarcasm, praise, happiness, helplessness, mockery, etc.

References:

انوری، حسن (1382). فرهنگ فشرده سخن. جلد 2 . تهران: سخن .
پیش‌قدم، رضا و فیروزیان پوراصفهانی، آیدا ( 1396). «تأملی جامعه‌شناختی پیرامون کاربردهای گفتمانی «نمی‌دانم» در زبان فارسی در پرتو الگوی هایمز». مطالعات فرهنگ- ارتباطات. دوره هجدهم. شماره سی و هفتم. صص 7-35.
دهخدا، ع. آ (1373). فرهنگ متوسط دهخدا (جلد 1-2). به کوشش غلامرضا ستوده، ایرج مهرکی، اکرم سلطانی، زیر نظر جعفر شهیدی . تهران: دانشگاه تهران، موسسه انتشارات وچاپ: موسسه لغت دهخدا.
صبوحی خامنه، لیلا، (1389) . «بررسی کنش‌های گفتاری دعا و نفرین در زبان فارسی»، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد.دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد.دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی دکتر علی شریعتی، گروه زبانشناسی.
محفوظ، نجیب.(1994). المولفات الکاملة. مکتبه لبنان ناشرون.لبنان: بیروت. الطبعه الاولی.
___، ( 1988. ) شهر العسل. القاهرة : مکتبة المصر.
___، (1967). تحت المظلة. القاهره. مکتبةالمصر‌.
معین، محمد (1371). فرهنگ فارسی. جلد 1. تهران: سپهر.
یول. جورج (1387). کاربرد شناسی زبان. ترجمه محمد عموزاده مهدریجی و منوچهر توانگر. تهران: سمت.
Blakwell, oxford and Cambridge Yule, George. (1996). The study of language: Cambridge University press.
Diani, Giuliana (2004). The discourse Functions of I don't know in English Conversation, Discourse Patterns in Spoken and Written Corpora, John Benjamins Publishing Company, DOI:10.1075/pbns.120.11.dia, 157-171.
Fasold, R. (1990). The Sociolinguistics of Language, Cambridge.
Gumperz, J., & Hymez, D.(1972). Directions in sociolinguistics- The ethnography of communication. Rinehart & Winston.
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in Sociliguistics: An Ethnographic Approach, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Hymes, D. (1967). “models of interaction of language and socialsetting”. Jornal ofsocial Issues.vol.3. No. 32. Pp. 8-28.
Saville-Troike, M. (2003). The Ethnography of Communication. (3rd ed). USA: Blackwell Publishing.
Schiffrin, Deborah (1994). Approaches to Discourse,Cambridge, MA & Oxford: Blackwell, Pp. x + 470.