A Comparative Study of Two Blood Droplets in Parvin’s poetry and Trilelo’s Three Droplets’ Debate

Subject Areas : شعر

Mehdi Momtahen ¹ , Mahboobeh Bahmani ²

1 - Associate Professor, Department of Arabic Language and Literature, Jiroft Branch, Islamic Azad University, Jiroft,Iran
2 - Master Student, Department of Arabic Language and Literature, Jiroft Branch, Islamic Azad University, Jiroft,Iran

Received: 2014-01-03 Accepted : 2014-01-03 Published : 2012-12-01

Keywords: قرآن, مدح, وطن, Blood, علامه اقبال لاهوری, امیرالشاراشوقی, اندیشه های مشترک, دیدن, Tears, unity, Traveling, Parvin, Trilelo,

Abstract :

This study aims to analyze the debate between two blood drops in Parvin poetry and then to compare it with Trilelo’s three blood droplets debate, which is said to be the inspirator of the Parvin’s debate and in this way to pick a cluster of Parvin’s thoughts. Parvin has lived in the emotional and spiritual environment of the Orient, an environment in which the treasure could not be reached without toil. Eastern conduct is based on toil and for this reason Parvin’s poetry has been faced by prolixity, whereas in the poetry of Trilelo we face the brevity of western conduct. Stating his feelings, Trilelo only goes within an internal conduct, but Parvin in her debate, in addition of an internal conduct, tries to approach to a social content and to reach from mysticism to justice. In fact, her poetry is a loop of the chain of fight against the oppression. Therefore, the poetry of Parvin is more developed and has more profundity.