Characteristics of the audit committee and auditor opinion shopping

Subject Areas :

Kazem  Shamsadini ¹ (Associate Professor of Accounting, Faculty of Management and Economics, Shahid Bahonar University, Kerman, Iran)
Ahmadsadegh  Soltaninejad ² (MSc of Accounting, Faculty of Management and Economics, Shahid Bahonar University, Kerman, Iran)
Hamze  Zade Deh Balaei ³ (MSc of Accounting, Faculty of Management and Economics, Shahid Bahonar University, Kerman, Iran)

Received: 2024-01-11 Accepted : 2024-02-12 Published : 2024-02-20

Keywords: Audit committee, auditor opinion shopping, characteristics of the audit committee, suspicious change of auditor,

Abstract :

Purpose: Agency theory emphasizes the role of the audit committee in assuring shareholders and reducing agency problems. The audit committee is a corporate governance mechanism that, if effective, minimizes suspicious audit changes that signal the purchase of the auditor's opinion. The purpose of this research is to investigate the relationship between the existence of audit committee in companies and its characteristics (independence, expertise and size) and the purchase of auditor's opinion. Methodology: In order to test the hypotheses, the data of 135 companies for the period 2005 to 2021 and 2013 to 2021 have been used for different hypotheses. To test the first hypothesis, the t-test was used, and the second, third, and fourth hypotheses were using the logistic model. Findings: The results of the first hypothesis test showed that the purchase of comments has decreased during the period when the audit committee was formed in the companies. Also, there is a negative and significant relationship between the independence and expertise of the members and the purchase of the auditor's opinion, but there is no significant relationship between the size of the committee and the purchase of the opinion. Originality: This research opened a new window of audit related discussions to the researchers and was conducted for the first time in Iran.

References:

برزگر، قدرت الله، حسن نتاج كردي، محسن، و ملكي، دنيا. (1397). بررسي اثر ويژگي‌هاي كميته حسابرسي بر افشاي مسئوليت اجتماعي شركت‌ها. بررسي‌هاي حسابداري و حسابرسي. 26(1). 38-19. doi: 10.22059/acctgrev.2019.264270.1007968
پزشک، یاسمن، و پور زمانی، زهرا. (1398). فصلی بودن حسابرسی، کیفیت افشاء اطلاعات و کیفیت حسابرسی. دانش حسابداري و حسابرسي مديريت، 8(29)، 70-57. https://www.jmaak.ir/article_13825.html
حاجیها، زهرا، و فتحی مقدم، مجتبی. (1392). رابطه تغییر در اظهارنظر حسابرسی با تأخیر درگزارشگری مالی. مطالعات تجربی حسابداری مالی، 11(41)، 156-131 doi: 20.1001.1.28210166.1392.11.41.6.2
صفرزاده، محمدحسین، و محمدی، عرفان. (1398). اثر ویژگی های کمیته حسابرسی بر رابطه بین پیچیدگی حسابرسی و تاخیر در گزارش حسابرسی. مطالعات تجربی حسابداری مالی، 16(62). 76-45. doi: 10.22054/qjma.2019.10413
عباس زاده، محمدرضا، فكور، حسين، و قناد، مصطفي. (1396). بررسي رابطه ويژگي‌هاي كميته حسابرسي و حق‌الزحمه خدمات حسابرسي. دانش حسابداري مالي، 4(3). 62-45.https://jfak.journals.ikiu.ac.ir/article_1282.html?lang=fa
قدس مفیدی، اقبال. (1398). بررسی تاثیر کمیته حسابرسی بر کاهش تحریفات مالی با تاکید بر تخصص حسابرس در صنعت. چشم انداز حسابداری و مدیریت. 8(2). 84-68. https://www.jamv.ir/article_89745.html?lang=fa
کامیابی، یحیی، و بوژمهرانی، احسان. (1394). ویژگی های کمیته حسابرسی، کیفیت افشا و نسبت غیر موظف اعضای هیات مدیره. پژوهش‌های تجربی حسابداری. 6(4). 218-191. doi: 10.22051/jera.2017.2631
لاری دشت بیاض، محمود، قناد، مصطفی، و فکور، حسین. (1397). ویژگی‌های کمیته حسابرسی و تأخیر در گزارش حسابرسی. پژوهش‌هاي‌ حسابداري ‌مالي‌ و‌ حسابرسي. 10(37). 241-215. doi: 20.1001.1.23830379.1397.10.37.9.9
منشور کمیته حسابرسی. (1391). سازمان بورس و اوراق بهادار.
Abbas Zadeh, M. R., Fakour, H., & Ghannad, M. (2017). The Relationship between the audit committee features and Audit services Fees. Financial Accounting Knowledge, 4(3), 47-64. https://jfak.journals.ikiu.ac.ir/article_1282.html?lang=fa [In Persian]
Abbott, L. J., & Parker, S. (2000). Auditor selection and audit committee characteristics. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 19(2),47-66. doi:10.2308/aud.2000.19.2.47
Archambeault, D., & DeZoort, T. F. (2001). Auditor Opinion Shopping and the Audit Committee: An Analysis of Suspicious Auditor Switches. International Journal of Auditing, 5(1), 33-52. doi: 10.1111/1099-1123.00324
Barzegar, G., Hasannataj kordi, M., & Malaki, D. (2019). An Investigation of the Audit Committee Characteristics Effects on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure. Accounting and Auditing Review, 26(1), 19-38. doi: 10.22059/acctgrev.2019.264270.1007968 [In Persian]
Beasley, M. (1996). An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review, 71(4), 443-465. https://www.jstor.org/stable/248566
Blue Ribbon Committee. (1999). Audit committee characteristics and restatements: A study of the efficacy of certain blue ribbon committee recommendations. New York Stock Exchange and National Association of Securities Dealers, New York, NY.
Carcello, J. V., & Neal, T. L. (2003). Audit committee characteristics and auditor dismissals following “new” going-concern reports. The Accounting Review, 78(1), 95-117. doi: 10.2308/accr.2003.78.1.95
Charter of the Audit Committee. (2012). Stock Exchange and Securities Organization. [In Persian]
Chen, K. Y., & Zhou, J. (2010). Audit Committee, Board Characteristics and Auditor Switch Decisions by Andersen's Clients. Contemporary Accounting Research, 24(4), 1085-1117. doi: 10.1506/car.24.4.2
Chow, C. (1982). The demand for external auditing: Size, debt and ownership influences. The Accounting Review, 57(2), 272-291. https://www.jstor.org/stable/247014
Chow, C., & Rice, S. (1982). Qualified audit opinions and auditor switching. The Accounting Review, 57(2), 326-335. https://www.jstor.org/stable/247018
Citron, D., & Taffler, R.J. (1992). The audit report under going concern uncertainties: An empirical analysis, Accounting and Business Research, 22(88), 337-345. doi: 10.1080/00014788.1992.9729449
DeFond, M., & Jiambalvo, J. (1991). Incidence and circumstances of accounting errors. The Accounting Review, 66(3), 643-655. https://www.jstor.org/stable/247814
DeZoort, F. (1997). An investigation of audit committees' oversight responsibilities. A Journal of Accounting, finance and Business Studies, 33(2), 208-227. doi: 10.1111/1467-6281.00012
DeZoort, F. T., & Salterio, S. (2001). The effects of corporate governance experience and financial and audit knowledge on audit committee members’ judgments. Forthcoming in Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 20(2), 31-52. doi: 10.2308/aud.2001.20.2.31
DeZoort, F.T. (1998). An analysis of experience effects on audit committee members’ oversight judgments. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(1), 1-21. doi: 10.1016/S0361-3682(97)00029-9
Fleak, S. K., & Wilson, E. R. (1994). The incremental information content of the going concern audit opinion. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 9(1), 149-66. doi: 10.1177/0148558X940090010
Ghodsmofidi, E. (2019). Investigating the impact of the audit committee on reducing financial distortions with emphasis on the specialty of the auditor in the industry. Accounting and Management Vision, 2(8), 68-84. https://www.jamv.ir/article_89745.html?lang=fa [In Persian]
Hajiha, Z., & Fathi Moghadam, M. (2014). The Relation between Changes in Audit Opinion and Financial Reporting Delay. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 11(41), 131-156. doi: 20.1001.1.28210166.1392.11.41.6.2 [In Persian]
Hendrickson, H., & Espahbodi, R. (1991). Second opinion, opinion shopping and independence. CPA Journal, 61(3), 26-29. http://archives.cpajournal.com/old/10504998.htm
Kalbers, L. P. (1992) An examination of the relationship between audit committees and external auditors. The Ohio CPA Journal, 14(4), 19-27. doi:10.1111/j.1467-629X.2006.00174.x
Kamyabi, Y., & Boozhmehrani, E. (2017). Audit Committee Characteristics, Quality of Disclosure and Proportion of Non-Executive Directors. Empirical Research in Accounting, 6(4), 191-218. doi: 10.22051/jera.2017.2631 [In Persian]
Kiger, J. E., & Scheiner, J. H. (1997). Auditing: Second edition. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Knapp, M. C. (1985). Audit conflict: An empirical study of the perceived ability of auditors to resist management pressure, The Accounting Review, 60(4), 202-211. http://www.jstor.org/stable/246786
Krishnan, J., & Stephens, R. G. (1994). Evidence on opinion shopping from audit opinion conservatism. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 14(3), 179-201. doi: 10.1016/0278-4254(95)00020-F
Krishnan, J., Krishnan, J., & Stephens, R. (1996). The simultaneous relation between auditor switching and audit opinion: Empirical analysis. Accounting and Business Research, 26(3), 224-236. doi: 10.1080/00014788.1996.9729513
Lari Dasht Bayaz, L., Fakour, H., & Ghannad, M. (2018). Characteristics of the audit committee and the delay in the audit report. Financial accounting and auditing research, 10(37), 215-241. doi: 20.1001.1.23830379.1397.10.37.9.9 [In Persian]
Lennox, C. (2002). Opinion shopping and audit committees. Journal of Practice and Theory, 19, 47-66. http://www.dl.handle.net/10086/13893
McConnell, D.K. (1984). Auditor changes and related disagreements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 3(2), 44-56.
McMullen, D., & Raghunandan, K. (1996). Enhancing audit committee effectiveness. Journal of Accountancy, 182(2), 79-81.
Mobasser, K. S., & Vatanparast, M., Azadi, K., Meshki Miavaghi, M. (2020). Corporate Governance and Audit Opinion Shopping: Evidence from Iran. International Journal of Finance and Managerial Accounting, 6(21), 13-23. http://www.ijfma.ir/article_17230.html
Nagle, B. (1996). Audit report modifications and auditor switches. Accounting Enquiries, 5(2), 171-202.
Palmrose, Z. V. (1986). Audit fees and auditor size: Further evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 24(1), 97-110. doi: 10.2307/2490806
Ruiz-Barbadillo, E., Gomez-Aguilar, N., & BiedmaLopez, E. (2006). Long-term audit engagements and opinion shopping: Spanish evidence. Accounting Fourm, 30(1), 61-79. doi: 10.1016/j.accfor.2005.03.007
Safarzadeh, M.H, & Mohammadi, E. (2019). The Effect of Audit Committee Characteristics on the Relationship between Audit Report Timeliness and Auditor Task Complexity. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 16(62), 45-76. doi: 10.22054/qjma.2019.10413 [In Persian]
Schwartz, K. B., & Soo, B. S. (1996). the Association Between Auditor Changes and Reporting Lags. The Accounting Review, 13(1), 353-370. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1996.tb00505.x
Schwartz, K., & Menon, K. (1985). Auditor switches by failing firms. The Accounting Review, 60(2), 248-261. doi: www.jstor.org/stable/246789
Securities and Exchange Commission. (1988). Disclosure Amendments to Regulation SK, Form 8-K and Schedule 14A regarding changes in accountants and potential opinion shopping situations. SEC Financial Reporting Release, 31.
Simamora, R. A., & Hendarjatno, H. (2019). The effects of audit client tenure, audit lag, opinion shopping, liquidity ratio, and leverage to the going concern audit opinion. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 4(1), 145-156. doi: 10.1108/AJAR-05-2019-0038
Williams, D. (1988). The potential determinants of auditor change. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 15(2), 243-261. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.1988.tb00133.x
Wolnizer, P. W. (1995). Are audit committees red herrings?. Abacus, 31(1), 45-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.1995.tb00354.x
Xie, z., Cai, C., & Ye, J. (2010). Abnormal Audit Fees and Audit Opinion– Further Evidence from China’s Capital Market, China journal of accounting research, 3(1), 51-70. doi: 10.1016/S1755-3091(13)60019-2