The conformational behaviors of 2,3-bis(methylthio)-1,4-dioxane (1), 2,3-bis(methylthio)-1,4-dithiane (2) and 2,3-bis(methylthio)-1,4-diselenane (3) have been analyzed by means ofhybrid-density functional theory (B3LYP/Def2-TZVPP) based method and NBO interpretation.B3LYP/Def2-TZVPP results showed that the axial conformations of compounds 1-3 are morestable than their equatorial conformations. The calculated Gibbs free energy difference (Geq–Gax)values (i.e. ΔGeq-ax) at 298.15 K and 1 atm between the axial and equatorial conformationsdecrease from compound 1 to compound 3. The NBO analysis of donor-acceptor (LP→σ*)interactions showed that the anomeric effects (AE) decrease from compound 1 to compound 3.On the other hand, the calculated dipole moment values between the axial and equatorialconformations [Δ(μeq - μax)] increase from compound 1 to compound 2 but decrease fromcompound 2 to compound 3. However, the variations of the calculated Δ(μeq - μax) values are notin the same trend observed for the corresponding AE and ΔG values. Therefore, the calculatedΔμ values do not seem to be sufficient to account for the axial preferences in compounds 1-3.These findings led to the proposal that the AE, due to donor→acceptor hyperconjugation effect,is more significant for the explanation of the axial conformational preferences of compounds 1-3than the electrostatic effect. Manuscript profile