The Role of Economic and Environmental Policies on Preventing Air Pollution

Subject Areas : Labor and Demographic Economics

Marziyeh Sadat  Vahabzadeh Moghadam ¹ (Student of Economics, Econometrics and Monetary Economics, Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research Unit, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran)
Karim  Eami ² (Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research Unit, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran)
Farzaneh  Haju Hassani ³ (Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research Unit, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran)

Received: 2022-12-31 Accepted : 2023-02-17 Published : 2022-11-22

Keywords: air pollution, environmental policies, JEL Classification: C10, E50, stochastic dynamic general equilibrium model, Q53. Keywords: Economic Policies,

Abstract :

The purpose of the article is to investigate the role of economic and environmental policies on preventing air pollution using the Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) model during the period of 1990-2019. Based on the results of the model, the economic policy shock causes a sudden increase in economic growth and consumption and then their decrease; However, the economic policy shock increases air pollution. The shock of environmental policies, firstly, increases consumption and economic growth and then decreases them. Investment also decreases as a result of the shock of environmental policies. Based on the results of variance analysis, the role of economic policies for the country's economic situation and creating air pollution is greater than environmental policies. The role of environmental policies in reducing air pollution is less than the role of economic policies in increasing air pollution. It is suggested that when the government increases its expenditures, it imposes green taxes or carbon emission taxes at a lower rate than the increase in government expenditures so that the economic growth of the country will continue to be maintained along with the reduction of environmental pollution.

References:

منابع

• امیری، حسین، پیرداده بیرانوند، محبوبه (1398). نااطمینانی سیاست­های اقتصادی و بازار سهام ایران با تکیه بر رویکرد تغییر رژیمی مارکف، نشریه علمی دانش مالی تحلیل اوراق بهادار، 44: 67-49.


• حقیقت، جعفر، حبیب­زاده، امین، محرم جودی، نازیلا (1396). سیاست مالی اقتصاد ایران در یک مدل DSGE (با تاکید بر خانوارهای غیریکاردین)، مجله تحقیقات اقتصادی، 52(3): 580-551.


• شهاب، محمدرضا، ناصرصدرآبادی، سیده مروه (1393)، بررسی اثر سیاست­های اقتصادی دولت بر کیفیت محیط‌زیست در کشورهای منتخب، علوم و تکنولوژی محیط زیست، 16(2): 150-139.


• فطرس، محمدحسن، براتی، جواد (1390). تجزیه انتشار دی­اکسیدکربن ناشی از مصرف انرژی به بخش‌های اقتصادی ایران؛ یک تحلیل تجزیه شاخص، مطالعات اقتصاد انرژی، 8(28): 73-49.


• کشت­کاران، نجمه، پناهی، حسین، بهبودی، داود (1399). آثار نامتقارن سیاست پولی بر بازار مسکن ایران: رویکرد DSGE، نظریه­های کاربردی اقتصاد، 4: 218-195.


• منظور، داود، صفاکیش، محمدکاظم (1390). آثار سیاست­های زیست‏محیطی و اقتصادی بر رفتار حمل و نقل شهری با رویکرد قیاسی- استقرایی: مطالعه موردی شهر تهران، فصلنامه تحقیقات مدل­سازی اقتصادی، 4: 187-171.


• Adewuyi, A.O. (2016). Effects of public and private expenditures on environmental pollution: A dynamic heterogeneous panel data analysis. Sustain. Energy Rev, 65, 489–506.


• Baloch RM, M. Christoffersen J, Banerjee S, Gabriel M, Csobod É, et al. (2020). Indoor Air Pollution, Physical and Comfort Parameters Related to Schoolchildren's Health: Data from the European Sinphonie Study. Science of Total Environment, 139870.


• Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Levine, R. (2010). New Data Base on Financial Development. IMF.


• Camarero, M., Forte, A., Garcia-Donato, G., Mendoza, Y., Ordoñez, J., (2015). Variable selection in the analysis of energy consumption–growth nexus. Energy Econ. 52: 207–216.


• Chan, Y.T. (2020). Are macroeconomic policies better in curbing air pollution than environmental policies? A DSGE approach with carbon-dependent fiscal and monetary policies, Energy Policy, 141: 111-154.


• Chen, F., & Chen, Z. (2021). Cost of economic growth: Air pollution and health expenditure. Science of the Total Environment, 755(1).


• Chen Z, Cui L, Cui X, Li X, et al. (2019). The Association between High Ambient Air Pollution Exposure and Respiratory Health of Young Children: A Cross Sectional Study in Jinan, China. Science of the Total Environment, 656: 740-749.


• Dinda, S. (2004). Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: A survey. Economy, 49(4), 431–455.


• Eren, B.M., Taspinar, N. & Gokmenoglu, K.K. (2019). The impact of financial development and economic growth on renewable energy consumption: Empirical analysis of India. Total Environ, 663: 189–197.


• Fischer, C., & Springborn, M. (2011). Emissions targets and the real business cycle: Intensity targets versus caps or taxes. Environ. Econ. Manag, 62(3): 352–366.


• Fotis, P., Polemis, M. (2018). Sustainable development, environmental policy and renewable energy use: a dynamic panel data approach. Dev, 26(6): 726-740.


• Glasure, Y.U. & Lee, A.-R. (1996). The macroeconomic effects of relative prices, money, and federal spending on the relationship between US energy consumption and employment. Energy Dev. 22 (1): 81–91.


• Grossman, G.M. & Krueger, A.B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economy, 110(2): 353–377.


• Haites, E. (2018). Carbon taxes and greenhouse gas emissions trading systems: what have we learned? Pol, 18(8): 955-966.


• Halkos, G.E., & Paizanos, E.A. (2013). The effect of government expenditure on the environment: An empirical investigation. Economy, 91: 48–56.


• Heidari, H., Katircioğlu, S.T., & Saeidpour, L. (2015). Economic growth, CO2 emissions, and energy consumption in the five ASEAN countries. International Journal of Electr. Power Energy Syst, 64: 785–791.


• Heyes, A., Zhu, M. (2019). Air pollution as a cause of sleeplessness: Social media evidence from a panel of Chinese Cities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 98: 1022-47.


• Katircioglu, S. Katircioglu, S. (2018). Testing the role of fiscal policy in the environmental degradation: the case of Turkey. Environ. Pollution Res, 25(6): 5616–5630.


• Shen, H., Liu, R., Xiong, H., Hou, F., & Tang, X. (2021). Economic policy uncertainty and stock price synchronicity: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance, 65.


• Stern, D.I. (2004). The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev, 32(8): 1419–1439.


• Stern, D. I. (2003). The environmental Kuznets curve. International society for ecological economics internet encyclopedia of ecological economics, department of economics, Rensselear Polytechnic Institute, USA.


• Yi, B-W. Zhang, S., & Wang, Y. (2020). Estimating air pollution and health loss embodied in electricity transfers: An inter-provincial analysis in China. Science of the Total Environment, 702: 134705.


• Yuxiang, K. & Chen, Z. (2010). Government expenditure and energy intensity in China. Energy Policy, 38(2): 691–694.


• Zhang, P. Deschenes, O. Meng, K., & Zhang, J. (2018). Temperature effects on productivity and factor reallocation: Evidence from a half million Chinese manufacturing plants. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 88: 1-17.


• Zhang, J. Zhang, Y. (2020). Examining the economic and environmental effects of emissions policies in China: A Bayesian DSGE model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 266.