Feasibility study of "forgiveness" of possible contagion due to crim
Hamid Masjedsaraei
1
(
semnan university
)
Hasan Poorlotfalah
2
(
PhD student in Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Islamic Law, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran
)
Reaz Elhami
3
(
Assistant Professor, Department of Islamic Jurisprudence and Law, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
)
Keywords: Death, Amnesty for a crime, possible transmission, a victim, removal of a guarantee,
Abstract :
The Islamic Penal Code has been silent on the possibility of a "pardon" of Johnny by Majniyah against the possible future spread of the crime of intentional assault. Reference to authentic Islamic sources and fatwas indicates that the present issue is the source of disagreement among jurists, so that the well-known jurists, mainly because such an amnesty requires our removal, do not consider it correct and remove the guarantee from They do not know the next infection. The second view considers such an amnesty to be a valid will, which is valid and effective for up to one-third of the diyat, and more than one-third of which is subject to the permission of the heirs. In contrast, some other contemporary jurists, without justifying this pardon by will, have absolutely ruled that such an amnesty is correct, which, in turn, guarantees the removal of any further contagion for Johnny. The present article, with its descriptive-analytical method, while re-reading the jurisprudential principles of the proposed views and using the available documents and approvals, has considered the third promise to be defensible. The proposal of the present article is that the legislature, with the aim of creating the unity of judicial procedure, by adding a legal article, to give legal validity to the "correctness of pardon from contagion and non-guarantee of life