Beyond Green : A Comprehensive Approach to Urban green space Quality and tastes of users in Tehran

Subject Areas : Space Ontology International Journal

Farzaneh Azadi ¹ , Kianoush Suzanchi ² , Mahdi Haghighatbin ³ , Mahdi Khansefid ⁴

1 -
2 -
3 -
4 -

Received: 2023-10-02 Accepted : 2024-05-01 Published : 2024-05-01

Keywords: landscape quality, urban green space, users&#039, tastes, beyond green,

Abstract :

The research tackles the pressing quality crisis in urban areas, particularly in green spaces. Landscape architects argue that the current approach lacks a comprehensive perspective, prompting the study to explore "landscape" from both objective and subjective angles. Systematically adopting visual and mental perspectives, the research aims to enhance urban space quality, emphasizing landscapes' dual nature beyond mere greenery. The primary goal of the study is to establish indicators for understanding and measuring landscape quality, drawing on the perceptions of local users of urban green spaces. This approach stresses the significance of considering both citizen perspectives and specialists in the field, treating urban spaces as landscapes. The research seeks to bridge the gap between the current and desired quality, ultimately improving the presence and usage of urban green spaces. The methodology involves a literature review for identifying qualitative indicators and exploring the relationship between them, along with a T-test to examine urban dwellers' preferences. In addition to these foundational aspects, the research findings reveal a pronounced quality imbalance between the two studied regions in Tehran (17 and 2). The observed disparities underscore significant differences in the tastes of urban dwellers and reveal a notable gap between these preferences and specialist beliefs, suggesting a potential avenue for achieving balance by concentrating on mediatory indicators. The study provides valuable insights for prioritizing key indicators based on user perspectives to enhance the quality of urban green spaces .

References:

Allaire, G. (2012). The Multidimensional Definition of Quality. 71-90
Alimardani, M., Sharghi, A., Mahdneshin, N. (2017). The Evaluation of Security Role in Urban Night Life and Vitality (Center city of Marand and Emam Khomeyni Street, Between Shaheed Ranjbari Street and 7 Tir treet). Journal of Applied Arts, 05(VOL.8): 15-26. (In Persian)
Cao, Y. Li, G. Huang, Y. (2023). Spatiotemporal Evolution of Residential Exposure to Green Space in Beijing. Remote Sens. 15, 1549. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15061549
Cohen, P. Potchter, O. Schnell, I. (2014). A methodological approach to the environmental quantitative assessment of urban parks. Appl. Geogr. 48, 87–101
Cabe, (2004). The value of public space. In: Woolley, H., Rose, S., Carmona, M., Freedman, J. (Eds.), How High-Quality Parks and Public Spaces Create Economic, Social and Environmental Value. CABE Space, London
Cabe, (2005). In: Cowan, R., Hill, D. (Eds.), Start with the Park: Creating Sustainable Urban Green Spaces in Areas of Housing Growth and Renewal. CABE Space, London
Charles E. Grantham, Y. (1987). Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Psychology, Sociology
Chau, p. (2023). Urban Green Quarter - Strategies for assessing green spaces of high-density low-rise residential areas in Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam. Open Access Te Herenga Waka-Victoria University of Wellington. Thesis. https://doi.org/ 10. 26686/ wgtn. 22588114
Croucher, Karen. Myers, Lindse. Bretherton, Jo. (2008). The Links Between Greenspace and Health: A Critical Literature Review. Scottish Natural Heritage and NHS Health Scotland:27.
Carmona, Matthew. (2021). Public Places Urban Spaces the Dimensions of Urban Design. 3rd Edition. New York. Routledge
Daniel, terry c. (2001). Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape assessment in the 21st century. Landscape and urban planning university.267-281
Degan. Monica, M. Rose, G. (2008). The Sensory Experiencing of Urban Design: The Role of Walking and Perceptual Memory, in urban studies,49, 3271-3287
Gobster, P. Nassauer, J. Daniel, T. Fry, G. (2007). The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology? Landscape Ecology, (22): 959-972. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-007-9110-x.
Geneletti, D. Cortinovis, C. Zardo, L. Esmail, B. A. (2020). Towards equity in the distribution of ecosystem services in cities. In Planning for Ecosystem Services in Cities. 57–66. Springer
Grahn, P. Stigsdotter, U.K. (2010). The relation between perceived sensory dimensions of urban green space and stress restoration. Landsc. Urban Plan. 94 (3–4), 264–275.
Gascon, M. Mas, M. Martínez, D. Dadvand, P. Forns, J. Plasència, A. Nieuwenhuijsen, M. (2015). Mental health benefits of long-term exposure to residential green and blue spaces: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.
Grahn, P.; Stoltz, J.; Skärbäck, E.; Bengtsson, A. (2023). Health-Promoting Nature-Based Paradigms in Urban Planning. Encyclopedia, 3, 1419–1438. ttps://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3040102
Gidlof. Gunnarsson, A. Ohrstrom, E. (2007). Noise and well-being in urban residential environments: the potential role of perceived availability to nearby green areas. Urban Plan. 83 (2–3), 115–126.
Heikinheimo, V. Tenkanen, H. Bergroth, C. Hiippala, T. Toivonen, T. (2020). Understanding the use of urban green spaces from user-generated geographic information. Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 201, September 2020, 103845
Jansson, M. Fors, H. Lindgren, T. Wiström, B. (2013). Perceived personal safety in relation to urban woodland vegetation—a review. Urban For. Urban Green. 12 (2), 127–133
Kabisch, N. (2017). Assessing the quality of urban green spaces: a comparative analysis of parks in 10 European cities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening
Kaplan, R. (1977). Patterns of environmental preference. Environ Behav. 9: 195
Kaplan S, Kaplan R, Wendt JS (1972). Rated preference and complexity for natural and urban visual material. Percept Psychophys., 12: 354-356
Khan, A. Moulaert, F. Schreurs, J. (2014). Understanding spatial quality: a relational epistemology and transdisciplinary perspectives in planning and urban design: JUD special issue. J. Urban Des. 19, 393–510.
Kong, F. Yin, H. Nakagoshi, N. (2007). Using GIS and landscape metrics in the hedonic price modeling of the amenity value of urban green space: a case study in Jinan City, China. Urban Plan. 79 (3–4), 240–252.
Kothencz, G. Blaschke, T. (2017). Urban parks: visitors’ perceptions versus spatial indicators. Land Use Policy 64, 233–244.
Knez, I. Ode Sang, Å. Gunnarsson, B. Hedblom, M. (2018). Wellbeing in urban greenery: the role of naturalness and place identity. Front. Psychol.
Kemperman A. Timmermans H. (2014). Green Spaces in the Direct Living Environment and Social Contacts of the Aging Population, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 129, pp. 44-45
Knobel, Pablo. Dadvandb, c, d Payam. Maneja-Zaragozaa, Roser. (2019). A systematic review of multi-dimensional quality assessment tools for urban green spaces. Health & Place (59).
Knobel, Pablo. Dadvand, Payam. Alonso, Lucia. Costa, Luis. Español, Maria. Maneja, Roser. Development of the urban green space quality assessment tool (RECITAL). (2021). Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.
kheyroddin, Raza. Kakavand, Elham. Omidi, Morteza. (2015). Evaluation of the Potential Impact of Developed Green Space by Using Pocket Park Approach in Historic Landscape Quality (Case Study: Qazvin city). Journal of Urban Landscape Research, Vol.1, No.2. 7-20. (In Persian)
Lang, J. (1987). Creating architectural theory: The role of the behavioral sciences in environmental design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold
Landry, C. (2000). Urban Vitality: A New Source of Urban Competitiveness”, Prince ClausFund Journal, ARCHIS issue 'Urban Vitality / Urban Heroes
Lategan, L. Cilliers, J. Huston, Z. Blaauw, N. Cilliers, S. (2021). Economic Assessment of South African Urban Green Spaces Using the Proximity Principle: Municipal Valuation vs. Market Value. Urban Planning, Volume 6, Issue 4, 54–66
Nurhayati, A, Mariapan, M. Kamal Mohd Shariff, M. (2010). Assessing the Quality of Green Open Spaces: A review. Healthy Parks Healthy People
Nasri Roodsari, E. Hoseini, P. (2021). An assessment of the correlation between urban green space supply and socio-economic disparities of Tehran districts—Iran. Environment, Development and Sustainability (2022) 24:12867–12882. (In Persian)
Pallasmaa, Juhani (2005). The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses
Poll, H. (1997). The perceived quality of the urban residential environment: a multi-attribute evaluation.
Palliwoda, J. (2021). What do people value in urban green? Linking characteristics of urban green spaces to users’ perceptions of nature benefits, disturbances, and disservices. Ecology and Society 26(1):28
Rahmani, Sarah. Nadimi, Hamid. (2019). A Reflection on Environmental Quality and Meaning. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar. volume 16. Number 71. pages 51-60. (In Persian)
Roschel, l. Davis, m. Naumann, S. (2019). Integrating user preferences into urban green and blue infrastructure planning: insights from Hall, Germani, and Stockholm, Sweden. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Vol 238
Roshani, P. Habibi, K. Zarabadi, Z. (2017). A Reflection on Environmental Quality and Meaning. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar. volume 16, number 71, pages 51-60. (In Persian)
Şenik, B. Uzun, O. (2022). A process approach to the open green space system planning. Landscape Ecol Eng 18, 203–219 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-021-00492-5
Simoni, T. (2006). Urban landscape as a restorative environment: preferences and design considerations. Acta agriculturae Slovenica. 87: 325-332.
Staats, H. Hartig, T. (2004). Alone or with a friend: A social context for psychological restoration and environmental preferences. J. Environ. Psychol., 24: 199-211.
Staats, H. Kieviet, A. Hartig, T. (2003). Where to recover from attentional fatigue: An expectancy-value analysis of environmental preference. J. Environ. Psychol., 23: 147-157
Stessensa, P. Cantersb, F. Huysmansc, M. Khana، A. (2020). Urban green space qualities: An integrated approach towards GIS-based assessment reflecting user perception. Land Use
Sanesi, G. Chiarello, F. (2006). Residents and urban green spaces: the case of Bari. Urban For. Urban Green. 4 (3–4), 125–134
Salingaros, N. A. (2000). Complexity and Urban coherence. Journal of Urban Design, 5(2): 291-316.
Sinafar, A. Partovi, P. Shokouhi, M. Investigating the Role of Permeability in Promotion of Quality of Environment of Neighborhood Unit (Case study: Tehran-Narmak). Hoviatshahr, 2015; 9(21): 91-100. (In Persian)
Shahcheraghi, A. (2009). Analysis of the perception process of the Iranian garden environment based on the theory of ecological psychology. hoviatshahr. third year. Number 5: 84-71. (In Persian)
Sadeghipey, N. (2012). Enhancing Green Space to Vital Space in Cities. Soffeh. Volume 22. No 2. Pages 61-78. (In Persian)
Smith, T. Nelischer, M. Perkins, N. (1997). Quality of an urban community: a framework for understanding the relationship between quality and physical form. Landsc. Urban Plan. 39 (2–3), 229–241
Tahir M, Roe H (2006). Sustainable Urban Landscapes: Making the Case for the Development of an Improved Management System. ALAM CIPTA, Int. J. Sustain. Trop. Design Res. Practice. 1: 17-24.
Tabibian, Mr. Mousavi, M. (2017). Investigation of Beautification and Improvement of Environmental Quality effect on the Urban Vitality” Case Study: Maragheh Historical Garden City. Armanshahrjournal. Volume9.Issue 17. Pages 249- 262. (In Persian)
Analysis of the Distribution of Parks and Gardens and their Location at the Urban Scale of Tehran with a Uniform Development Approach. (2015). Tehran urban planning and research
Vahdat, S. Karimi Moshaver, M. Sajadzadeh, H. (2015). Conceptualizing the factors affecting of streetscape to promote the legibility of urban spaces (Case Studies: Hamedan inner city streets). Motaleate shahri. Volume 4, Issue 15, Pages 17-36. (In Persian)
Van Herzele, A. Wiedemann, T. (2002). A monitoring tool for the provision of accessible and attractive urban green spaces. Landsc. Urban Plan. 63 (2), 109–126
Van Den Berg AE, Maas J. Verheij RA, (2010). Green space as a buffer between stressful life events and health. Soc. Sci. Med., 70: 1203-1210.
Whitfield, A. Wiltshire, John. (1982). “Design training and aesthetic evaluation: An intergroup comparison”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, no.2. 109-117.
Zhang Y, Van den Berg AE, Van Dijk T, Weitkamp G. (2017). Quality over Quantity: Contribution of Urban Green Space to Neighborhood Satisfaction. Int J Environ Res Public Health. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14050535. PMID: 28509879; PMCID: PMC5451986.
Zhang, L. Wu, Y. (2022). Negative Associations between Quality of Urban Green Spaces and Health Expenditures in Shanghai. Land. 11, 1261. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11081261.