• Home
  • Land-Use Modification based on Transit-Oriented Development adjacent to Historical Context (Case Study: Qazvin City)

Share To

Article Url


Manuscript ID : SOIJ-2104-1416 (R1) Visit : 247 Page: 67 - 79

10.22094/soij.2021.1929092.1416

20.1001.1.23456450.2021.10.3.5.8

Article Type: Original Research

Land-Use Modification based on Transit-Oriented Development adjacent to Historical Context (Case Study: Qazvin City)

Subject Areas : Space Ontology International Journal

Hamid Mirzahossein 1 , Amir Abbas Rassafi 2 , Kaveh Sadeghi 3 , Pooyan Najafi 4

1 - Department of Civil-Transportation Planning, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran
2 - Department of Civil-Transportation Planning, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran
3 - Department of Civil-Transportation Planning, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran
4 - Department of Civil-Transportation Planning, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran

Received: 2021-04-27 Accepted : 2021-06-24 Published : 2021-09-01

Keywords:

Abstract :

References:


  1. Jahanshahi, M.H., Sustainable urban development based on public transport. jostar hay shahersaze, 2008. 26-27(7): p. 34-43.
    2.
  2. Yaliniz, P., et al., Evaluation of urban public transportation efficiency in Kutahya, Turkey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2011. 20: p. 885-895.
    3.
  3. Brown, L.J., D. Dixon, and O. Gillham, Urban Design for an Urban Century: Placemaking for People. 2009: Wiley.
    4.
  4. Savory, R., Iran under the Safavids. 1980: Cambridge University Press.
    5.
  5. Ali, L., et al., Dynamics of Transit-Oriented Development, Role of Greenhouse Gases and Urban Environment: A Study for Management and Policy. Sustainability, 2021. 13(5): p. 2536.
    6.
  6. Ibraeva, A., et al., Transit-oriented development: A review of research achievements and challenges. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2020. 132: p. 110-130.
    7.
  7. Nasri, A. and L. Zhang, The analysis of transit-oriented development (TOD) in Washington, D.C. and Baltimore metropolitan areas. Transport Policy, 2014. 32: p. 172-179.
    8.
  8. Pan, H., et al., What determines rail transit passenger volume? Implications for transit-oriented development planning. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2017. 57: p. 52-63.
    9.
  9. Ewing, R., et al., Trip and parking generation at transit-oriented developments: Five US case studies. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2017. 160: p. 69-78.
    10.
  10. Tian, G., et al., Trip and parking generation at transit-oriented developments: a case study of Redmond TOD, Seattle region. Transportation, 2017. 44(5): p. 1235-1254.
    11.
  11. Shirke, C., et al., Transit-Oriented Development and Its Impact on Level of Service of Roads & METRO: A Case Study of Mumbai Metro Line-I. Transportation Research Procedia, 2017. 25: p. 3035-3054.
    12.
  12. Park, K., et al., The impacts of built environment characteristics of rail station areas on household travel behavior. Cities, 2018. 74: p. 277-283.
    13.
  13. Pongprasert, P. and H. Kubota, TOD residents’ attitudes toward walking to transit station: a case study of transit-oriented developments (TODs) in Bangkok, Thailand. Journal of Modern Transportation, 2019. 27(1): p. 39-51.
    14.
  14. Duncan, M., Would the replacement of park-and-ride facilities with transit-oriented development reduce vehicle kilometers traveled in an auto-oriented US region? Transport Policy, 2019. 81: p. 293-301.
    15.
  15. Xu, T., M. Zhang, and P.T. Aditjandra, The impact of urban rail transit on commercial property value: New evidence from Wuhan, China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2016. 91: p. 223-235.
    16.
  16. Yu, H., H. Pang, and M. Zhang, Value-added effects of transit-oriented development: The impact of urban rail on commercial property values with consideration of spatial heterogeneity. Papers in Regional Science, 2018. 97(4): p. 1375-1396.
    17.
  17. Olaru, D., B. Smith, and J.H.E. Taplin, Residential location and transit-oriented development in a new rail corridor. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2011. 45(3): p. 219-237.
    18.
  18. Kamruzzaman, M., et al., Commuting mode choice in transit-oriented development: Disentangling the effects of competitive neighborhoods, travel attitudes, and self-selection. Transport Policy, 2015. 42: p. 187-196.
    19.
  19. Ratner, K.A. and A.R. Goetz, The reshaping of land use and urban form in Denver through transit-oriented development. Cities, 2013. 30: p. 31-46.
    20.
  20. Zhao, P., et al., Disintegration of metro and land development in transition China: A dynamic analysis in Beijing. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2018. 116: p. 290-307.
    21.
  21. Zhao, L. and L. Shen, The impacts of rail transit on future urban land use development: A case study in Wuhan, China. Transport Policy, 2019. 81: p. 396-405.
    22.
  22. Kamruzzaman, M., et al., Advance transit-oriented development typology: a case study in Brisbane, Australia. Journal of Transport Geography, 2014. 34: p. 54-70.
    23.
  23. Strong, K.C., et al., Decision Support Framework for Transit-Oriented Development Projects. Transportation Research Record, 2017. 2671(1): p. 51-58.
    24.
  24. Ke, L., K. Furuya, and S. Luo, Case comparison of typical transit-oriented-development stations in Tokyo district in the context of sustainability: Spatial visualization analysis based on FAHP and GIS. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2021. 68: p. 102788.
    25.
  25. Wey, W.-M., H. Zhang, and Y.-J. Chang, Alternative transit-oriented development evaluation in sustainable built environment planning. Habitat International, 2016. 55: p. 109-123.
    26.
  26. Wey, W.-M., Smart growth and transit-oriented development planning in site selection for a new metro transit station in Taipei, Taiwan. Habitat International, 2015. 47: p. 158-168.
    27.
  27. Sung, H., and J.-T. Oh, Transit-oriented development in a high-density city: Identifying its association with transit ridership in Seoul, Korea. Cities, 2011. 28(1): p. 70-82.
    28.
  28. Yang, J., et al., Density-oriented versus development-oriented transit investment: Decoding metro station location selection in Shenzhen. Transport Policy, 2016. 51: p. 93-102.
    29.
  29. Ma, X., et al., Sustainable station-level planning: An integrated transport and land use design model for transit-oriented development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018. 170: p. 1052-1063.
    30.
  30. Sahu, A., A methodology to modify land uses in a transit-oriented development scenario. Journal of Environmental Management, 2018. 213: p. 467-477.
    31.
  31. Mirzahossein, H., et al., Overview of the Literature on the Transit-Oriented Development to Investigate a Practical Solution for Traffic Congestion in Iran Cities. International Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2020. 7(4): p. 355-372.
    32.
  32. Behzadfar, M. and M. Zabihi, Transit-Oriented Development: Plan Making Guideline in Urban Areas. Bagh-e Nazar, 2012.
    33.
  33. Rafiean, M., H. Asgari Tafreshi, and E. Siddiqui, Function for Approach of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) in Land-Use Planning Case Study: Sadeghieh Metro Station. Spatial Planning (Modares Human Sciences), 2011. 14: p. 295-312.
    34.
  34. Momayez's, s. and n. Poormoalem, Locating new TODs for Isfahan city to reduce downtown traffic volume, in First International Conference on Civil, Architectural and Sustainable Green City. 2017: Hamedan.
    35.
  35. Alalhesabi, M., N. Bonyadi, and M. Rabiee, Urban design of station complex in the approach of TOD (case study:allame majlesi station-junction of line4 metro and line 2 brt of Mashhad), in On urban design. 2011, ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY Central Tehran Branch.
    36.
  36. Alalhesabi, M. and S. Moradi, On Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) and the criteria for determining TOD centers: The case of Shiraz metro line 1. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba: Memary Va Shahrsazi, 2010. 2(41): p. 111-122.
    37.
  37. Zabihi, H., B. Abdolah, and B. Abdolah, Evaluating and Determining the Role of the Government Gate Station Complex with Public Transport-Based Development (TOD) Approach. motale'at moderyat shhrey, 2017. 8(26): p. 19-30.
    38.
  38. Rafiean, M. and Z. Akbari, Urban Land Use Planning around Shoush Station with Emphasis on Transit Oriented Development Approach, in Department of Urban & Regional Planning. 2011, TarbiatModarres University: TarbiatModarres University. p. 151.
    39.
  39. Abbaszadegan, M., R. Rezazadeh, and M. Mohammadi, Transit-Oriented Development and Role of Tehran Subway System. Bagh-e Nazar, 2011. 8(17): p. 43-58.
    40.
  40. Motieyan, H. and M.S. Mesgari, Towards Sustainable Urban Planning Through Transit-Oriented Development (A Case Study: Tehran). ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2017. 6(12): p. 402.
    41.
  41. Shahriar Afandizadeh, Z., M. Hamid, and C. Yi-Chang, Quick Link Selection Method by Using Pricing Strategy Based on User Equilibrium for Implementing an Effective Urban Travel Demand Management. Promet - Traffic&Transportation, 2016. 28(6).
    42.
  42. Cervero, R., Transit-oriented development in the United States: Experiences, challenges, and prospects. Vol. 102. 2004: Transportation Research Board.
    43.
  43. Guerra, E., R. Cervero, and D. Tischler, Half-mile circle: does it best represent transit station catchments? Transportation Research Record, 2012. 2276(1): p. 101-109.
    44.
  44. Rotblat, H.J., Structural impediments to change in the Qazvin bazaar. Iranian Studies, 1972. 5(4): p. 130-148.
    45.
  45. Pourjafar, M., Organizing the Cultural, Historical Axes of Qazvin City with Contextualism Approach,(Case Study: Street Peighambarieh). Space Ontology International Journal, 2017. 6(3): p. 1-16.
    46.
  46. Taghavi, M. and G.A. Hatam, Evaluation of Seljuk and Safavid designs and arrays monuments in Qazvin. Advances in Environmental Biology, 2015: p. 204-215.
    47.
  47. Zarabadi, N., New life for old buildings: construction on the historic environment: case study, Amini house, Qazvin, Iran. 2014, Politecnico di Torino.
    48.
  48. Karimi, T., Urban Sustainable Development Solutions by Creating Dynamic Tourism Pedestrian Passage in Historical Textures (Case Study: Sepah Street in Qazvin). Fen Bilimleri Dergisi (CFD), 2015. 36(6).
    49.
  49. Mitchell, M., An introduction to genetic algorithms. 1998: MIT press.
    50.
  50. Tammam, M., et al., A multi-objective genetic algorithm based PID controller for load frequency control of power systems. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 2013. 3(12): p. 463-467.
    51.
  51. Mustafa Kia, S., Genetic Algorithms in Matlab. 2015: Kyan rayanh sabz.
    52.
  52. Shastry, S., Spatial assessment of transit-oriented development in Ahmedabad, India. 2010, University of Twente. p. 1-105.
    53.
  53. Hosseinali, F., A. Alesheikh, and F. Nourian, Agent-based Modeling of Urban Land-use Development, Case study: Simulating Future Scenarios of Qazvin City. Cities, 2012. 31.
    54.
  54. Jabbari, M., F.P. da Fonseca, and R.A.R. Ramos, Assessing the Pedestrian Network Conditions in Two Cities: The Cases of Qazvin and Porto, in Urban Heritage Along the Silk Roads. 2020, Springer. p. 229-245.
    55.
  55. Balling, R.J., et al., Multiobjective urban planning using genetic algorithm. Journal of urban planning and development, 1999. 125(2): p. 86-99.
    56.
  56. Stewart, T.J., R. Janssen, and M. van Herwijnen, A genetic algorithm approach to multiobjective land use planning. Computers & Operations Research, 2004. 31(14): p. 2293-2313.
    57.

Sanad

Sanad is a platform for managing Azad University publications

Links

Related Centers

Technical Support

Official pages

The rights to this website are owned by the Raimag Press Management System.
Copyright © 2021-2024

Home| Login| About Us| Contact Us|
[فارسی] [العربية] [fa] [ar]