Compare spatial analysis Minnesota Pollution Control Agency of landfill in Bushehr and the Environmental Protection Agency's
Subject Areas :طلیعه Abdolkhani nejhad 1 , S.M Monavari 2 , سعید Zarei 3
1 - مدرس دانشگاه دپیام نور استان بوشهر
2 - استادیار دانشگاه گروه محیط زیست
3 - دانشجوی دکترای زمین شناسی محیط زیست دانشگاه بیرجند
Keywords: Evaluation, landfill, Maine, Minnesota (MPCA), the Environmental Protection Agency's,
Abstract :
Development of land in the area of natural resources and human threats to the environment from various sourcesis imported. This study aimed to compare the results of the Minnesota Pollution Control method Bushehr landfillsite selection and environmental protection organizations in the GIS were studied. Methods Minnesota PollutionControl consists of two groups of factors. The first group of six playoff factor and the second group of sevensecondary condition factor, failure to meet the six primary factor in eliminating the desired location.Environmental criteria are examined and the distance from surface water, airport, away from roads andhighways, are wells, wetlands, and sensitive earthquake-prone areas, terrain, annual waste deep undergroundwater, land use, erosion, cover Plant and primary and secondary factors were determined in Minnesota with theuse of GIS. The results showed landfill in Bushehr current zoning and distance from the aqueduct and Jshmhhaymost studied area in Minnesota inappropriate criteria in categories B, a secondary index. According to theEnvironmental Protection Agency, landfills% 43.75% 56.25 appropriate and inappropriate. This limiting factor,distance from surface water, exposure to wind, flood storage areas, making the area susceptible to earthquakesand low depth to groundwater from shallow wells due to proximity to the sea has a great impact. Classificationerosion study area are inadequate landfill and erosion in the region is very high.
